Should The United States President Still Be Sworn In Using A Bible?

Should The United States President Still Be Sworn In Using A Bible? August 29, 2016

Do you think the United States president should still be sworn in on a Bible?

Swearing or Affirming?

Should United States presidents who have been elected be sworn in on the Bible? Most presidents in the past have done so, but that doesn’t mean that they all should. For one thing, the Bible commands us to not swear by anything or anyone under heaven or on earth, because we can’t make something happen just by making an oath or by swearing that something is true or not or that we’ll do something. Jesus said, “you have heard that it was said to those of old, ‘You shall not swear falsely, but shall perform to the Lord what you have sworn.’ But I say to you, Do not take an oath at all, either by heaven, for it is the throne of God, or by the earth, for it is his footstool, or by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great King” (Matt 5:33-35). Jesus’ point is that we shouldn’t swear by anything or anyone at all or make a promise we might not be able to keep, and even if we say we’ll keep our word, something could happen that doesn’t allow us to keep our promise and we end up swearing to God that we’ll do something and may end up not being able to keep that promise at all. It would be better to affirm that you will do such and such a thing or things, rather than swear that you will.

Making Oaths

James, Jesus’ half-brother, once wrote “But above all, my brothers, do not swear, either by heaven or by earth or by any other oath, but let your “yes” be yes and your “no” be no, so that you may not fall under condemnation” (James 5:12). By James saying, “above all” he is saying that this is critically important. James wrote this in the context of Job’s suffering where he wrote, “as an example of suffering and patience, brothers, take the prophets who spoke in the name of the Lord. Behold, we consider those blessed who remained steadfast. You have heard of the steadfastness of Job, and you have seen the purpose of the Lord, how the Lord is compassionate and merciful” (James 5:10-11). James’ point is that we should just tell people yes or no, and not add anything to our words in order to make our word or promise sound surer. We can’t make anything happen just be swearing an oath or making a promise. We must simply respond with a yes or a no because anything more than this, as James puts it, places us at risk of falling under God’s condemnation. Not a condemnation to hell but not having God’s blessings. If we say we’re going to do something, perhaps we should qualify it by saying, “If I possible can…I will,” instead of, “I swear to God” or “I vow under oath before God that I will do such and such.” It is best to just let it be yes or let it be no. Anything more than this is wrong.

But-above-all-my (2)

Making Promises

Even though we can promise someone something or promise them that we’ll do something, we can’t necessarily make that promise come true. Things can interfere with our ability to keep that promise. Again, it comes down to just saying yes or no. We shouldn’t make promises unless we are absolutely certain we can keep that promise, and even with promises that we think we should be able to keep, it’s better again to just say yes or no and not make any sort of promise because we might not be able to keep that promise. You could make a promise that you will do something but it’s wise to qualify that promise by saying, “if it’s possible” or “if I can,” because we can only control certain circumstances in life and most of things in our life are beyond our control, so promising something is not wise and it comes close to making an oath or swearing in the sense that we might not be able to keep that promise. Things come up. Circumstances change. And these are things that we might not even be able to control at all and they may prohibit us from keeping that promise.

Presidential Oaths

Should presidents be made to place their hand on the Bible and swear by it? I don’t believe we should make it compulsory because we are commanded to not make oaths, not swear by anything, and to not make promises we can’t keep, so swearing an oath on the Bible could bring God’s judgment on those who do and then break their own vows and to require a president to do so, could put them at risk for God’s judgment if they break that oath. Besides, the Bible flatly states that we should not swear, make an oath, or a vow that we might not be able to keep. The Oath of the Office of the President of the United States is: “I, [fill in the name] do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.” If a president swears to support and defend the Constitution, and faithfully discharge their duties of this office, and then pledge, “So help me God,” there is a very good chance that this oath will be broken. It doesn’t make the president more likely to do his or her duty…it only placed them under their own oath that they may or may not be able to keep. They might even purposefully choose not to keep the promise or oath.

Conclusion

Vows are similar to swearing an oath or taking a vow. Jesus said, “And do not take an oath by your head, for you cannot make one hair white or black. Let what you say be simply ‘Yes’ or ‘No’; anything more than this comes from evil” (Matt 5:36-37) because “he (or she) who swears by heaven swears by God’s throne and by the One who sits on it” (Matt 5:34). King Solomon knew that “It is better that you should not vow than that you should vow and not pay” (Eccl 5:5) because “If you make a vow to the LORD your God, you shall not delay fulfilling it, for the LORD your God will surely require it of you, and you will be guilty of sin” (Deut 32:21). Since the Bible teaches we shouldn’t swear, why should we require our newly elected or re-elected presidents do so?

Article by Jack Wellman

Jack Wellman is Pastor of the Mulvane Brethren Church in Mulvane Kansas. Jack is also the Senior Writer at What Christians Want To Know whose mission is to equip, encourage, and energize Christians and to address questions about the believer’s daily walk with God and the Bible. You can follow Jack on Google Plus or check out his book Teaching Children the Gospel available on Amazon.


Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Brian Westley

    Should presidents be made to place their hand on the Bible and swear by it?

    They can’t be; any such requirement would be an unconstitutional religious test, prohibited by Article VI section 3.

    The Oath of the Office of the President of the United States is: “I, [fill in the name] do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”

    Wrong. The oath of office for president is in the constitution. It is:
    “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

    What you quoted seems to be the United States Uniformed Services Oath of Office, and “So help me God” is optional, so it should be in square brackets.

  • Leyla1001nights

    No. They should swear on a copy of the Constitution. And no need to say “so help me, God” either. Which god? And why should it be mentioned by the leader of a secular nation?

  • Michael.Pinecone.V2

    Do you think that also mean those that follow Jesus should not make the vows required to serve in a jury? Or is that another topic all together?

  • Sam Andrew

    Some excellent points here, it is always wise to add a caveat any time you claim you will do something as indicated here, something like ‘so long as it is convenient and beneficial for me to do so at a given time I may do X, but do not guarantee it’. Of course this would have to extent to all types of vows/oaths, including those related to marriage and religion – e.g. ‘will follow Jesus/be faithful to spouse if it is possible, if circumstances permit.

    It’s interesting that people even still consider swearing on a bible at all, especially politicians, it seems ridiculous they would even consider it any more, in democracies they are to serve their constituents who are of varied and no religion and so should refrain from any reference to religion at all in their role to avoid perceived bias.

  • pud

    The “buybull” is the most ignorant stupid compilation of ridiculous superstitious nonsense ever contrived. Anyone using it is swearing to uphold mythical nonsense, slavery, scientific idiocy and a litany of Bronze Age lunacy