White Fragility in the ELCA: 5 Things We Can Do About It

White Fragility in the ELCA: 5 Things We Can Do About It July 30, 2022

A 2021 clergy survey indicates that White Fragility in the ELCA is muzzling Lutheran preachers. Here are 5 things we can do about it.

White Fragility in the ELCA. Image created by Leah D. Schade using photo by Beth Macdonald on Unsplash. https://unsplash.com/photos/wQ05IXAifd8

In his book, Dear Church: A Love Letter from a Black Preacher to the Whitest Denomination in the US, Lenny Duncan made an important observation. “In a century marked by increased diversity in the United States and increased global awareness, the ELCA remains the whitest denomination in the country,” (6).

According to the most recent report available on the ELCA website, in 2017, the total number of people of color comprising active membership in the denomination was only 10%.  This means that the ELCA is 90% white.  And this number has remained constant since the 2012 report showing that 8.56% of ELCA membership was comprised of people of color.

How does the ELCA’s racial make-up compare with the demographics of the United States? 

According to the 2020 Census report, whites comprised 57.8% of the population.  This is a decrease from 63.7% in 2010.

So, while the U.S. has increasingly diversified, the ELCA has remained staunchly homogenous.  This, despite lip service from denominational leaders promising efforts to gain new, younger, and racially and ethnically diverse members.

What might account for the ELCA’s stubborn whiteness problem?

As Robert P. Jones observes in White Too Long: The Legacy of White Supremacy in American Christianity, “American Christianity’s theological core has been thoroughly structured by an interest in protecting white supremacy,” (6). Jones’ research indicates that “the genetic imprint of this legacy [of white supremacy] remains present and measurable in contemporary white Christianity, not only among evangelicals in the South but also among mainline Protestants in the Midwest and Catholics in the Northeast,” (20-21).

Duncan concurs with the notion that whiteness is not merely a sociological problem, but a theological problem. “We as a church have declared racism a sin,” he says. “But the demonic system that keeps racist structures in place is where our real work will need to begin.  We need to name evil for what it is, and we won’t overcome it until we do” (6).

White Fragility in the ELCA is real

But as Robin DiAngelo has pointed out, “white fragility” is real, and it is a barrier to deconstructing racism in the U.S. (See: White Fragility: Why It’s so Hard for White People to Talk about Racism.) DiAngelo defines white fragility as “a state in which even a minimum amount of racial stress . . . becomes intolerable, triggering a range of defensive moves . . . such as anger, fear, and guilt and behaviors such as argumentation, silence, and leaving the stress-inducing situation. These behaviors, in turn, reinstate white racial equilibrium,” (103).

Robert Jones suggests that all of this is part of white Christianity’s efforts to “maintain an unassailable sense of religious purity that protects white racial innocence,” (20-21). White Christians and their white-dominant society have, in essence, colluded in “deflecting any attempt to trace this ideology to its religious source,” (20-21).

The case of Rev. Nelson Rabell González has highlighted White Fragility in the ELCA.

Rev. Nelson Rabell Gonzalez, pastor of Iglesia Luterana Santa María Peregrina

White Fragility in the ELCA has become painfully apparent during the saga of Rev. Nelson Rabell González, an ELCA pastor who was wrongly accused of misconduct and removed from the roster of ordained ministry without due process.  (See: The Removal of Rev. Rabell-González: A Case Study in ELCA Corruption and Racism).  Both he, his congregation, and the entire Latiné membership in the ELCA have experienced deep pain and betrayal.

As just one example, Presiding Bishop Elizabeth Eaton did not even use the word “racism” to describe this debacle in the Sierra Pacific Synod. In her announcement about the Listening Panel Report, which repeatedly noted racism as an issue impacting the actions of former bishop Megan Rohrer’s handling of Rev. Nelson and Misión Latina Luterana, Eaton’s silence on this issue was deafening.

What about ELCA clergy?

But what about ELCA clergy?  Are they also hesitant to name racism for the evil that it is?  Are they also reticent to encourage and lead their congregations in the work of antiracism?

My research surveying clergy on ministry, preaching, and social issues may offer some insights into these questions.

Data on ELCA clergy from the survey, “Ministry, Preaching, and Social Issues”

I’ve been conducting longitudinal research* on U.S. clergy since 2017 to assess how preachers are approaching their sermons during this divisive time in our nation’s history.  The second survey wave in 2021 garnered more than 2,600 respondents, 416 of whom indicated that they are ELCA clergy. When we drill down on this subset, there are important learnings that shed light on White Fragility in the ELCA and what we can do about it.

First, here’s some basic demographic data.  Within the ELCA clergy respondents, the split between male and female clergy was almost even (48% female, 51% male, 1% other). 95% of respondents were white.  In terms of political orientation, 22% indicated they were “moderate, lean progressive,” while 68% were either “progressive/liberal” or “very progressive/liberal.” Only 10% indicated they were “moderate/lean conservative” or “conservative.”  None marked themselves as “very conservative.”

ELCA clergy are not shrinking violets when it comes to addressing social issues.

As a whole, ELCA Lutheran clergy do not shrink from advocacy, activism, or dialogue about social issues.

  • 80% indicated that advocacy and/or activism on social issues is either “high” or “moderate” priority for them.
  • 93% either “moderately” or “strongly” believe that “churches should put their faith into action through advocacy and social justice.”
  • 95% either “moderately” or “strongly” believe that “churches should host educational dialogues about social issues and faith.”

Along those same lines, 85% “strongly agree” that clergy should “help congregants think about social issues biblically and theologically.”  77% “strongly agree” that clergy should “teach congregants how to engage in healthy dialogue about social issues.” And 73% “strongly agree” that clergy should “help congregants put faith into action on social issues.”

In other words, ELCA Lutheran clergy are no shrinking violets when it comes to engagement with issues of public concern.  As one respondent commented, “I think it is important to help people gain the skills to think critically from a Christian perspective about social issues, encouraging a whole-life approach to discipleship.”

Clergy serving white congregations v. diverse congregations

But when we compare clergy who serve in primarily white congregations with their colleagues who serve more diverse congregations, we see marked differences.  For this survey, we’re referring to congregations with at least 25% or more other-than-white members. (Note that these demographic assessments were offered by the clergy themselves based on knowledge of their congregations.)

There were 267 respondents who indicated that they serve mostly white congregations and only 37 who serve more diverse churches.  (The rest, 112 clergy, fell somewhere in between.) This means that only 9% of ELCA clergy serve congregations with diversity levels over 25%.  This is consistent with the ELCA’s own data indicating that around 10% of its membership is other-than-white.

Even though this is a small subset of ELCA clergy, the data from this group shows stark contrasts to their colleagues serving white congregations – especially when it comes to preaching about social issues.

Clergy serving diverse congregations address social issues more frequently than those serving white congregations.

Overall, within the total number of ELCA clergy, 43% said that they “sometimes” address social issues in their sermons, while 50% said they do so “frequently.”  Also, 44% reported that they would like to engage social issues but feel inhibited.

These numbers change when accounting for the racial makeup of congregations.  86% of those serving diverse churches said they “frequently” address social issues, and only 19% said they feel inhibited.  But only 49% of ELCA clergy serving white congregations said they “frequently” address social issues. And 50% of them say they feel inhibited.

In other words, it appears that White Fragility in the ELCA impinges on preachers’ engagement with social issues.

Further evidence of this is seen in the levels of pushback ELCA clergy receive when addressing social issues.  63% of those serving white congregations said they receive pushback, whereas only 32% of their colleagues serving diverse congregations experience this.

But even when they don’t experience pushback, clergy in white congregations sense less engagement on social issues than their counterparts in diverse congregations.  59% of those serving white congregations said they experience “lack of interest” when addressing social issues compared with 38% of those serving more diverse churches.

Clergy serving white congregations address racism, immigration, and Native American issues less frequently than those serving diverse congregations.

Code of Silence. Photo by engin akyurt on Unsplash. https://unsplash.com/photos/vYqAHQNaOis

In this survey, respondents were given a list of 26 different social issues and asked which ones they had addressed or incorporated into their preaching in 2020. 74% of ELCA clergy serving white congregations said they had addressed racism/white supremacy/Black Lives Matter.  But the number increases to 86% for clergy serving diverse congregations, a 12-point increase.

We see an even starker contrast when asking about the topic of immigration. 44% of ELCA clergy serving white congregations said they had addressed immigration in 2020.  But for those serving diverse congregations, that number jumps to 70%!

We see a similar trend when it comes to Native American issues.  A mere 8% of clergy serving white congregations addressed Native American issues in 2020. But for those serving diverse congregations, that number went up to 24%.

Why we must be honest about White Fragility in the ELCA

As I wrote in a chapter for the anthology, Unmasking White Preaching: Racial Hegemony, Resistance, and Possibilities in Homiletics (p. 80):

As we think of the challenges that clergy face in preaching to unmask, confront, deconstruct, and expel the demon of white supremacy and racism as well as our own homiletical whiteness, [Carolyn] Helsel reminds us that “as people of faith, we are all called to attend to the suffering of one another. In order to attend to this suffering, we need to first acknowledge that it exists. Racism continues to exist, and refusing to name it will not make it go away” (Anxious to Talk About It, 4).

Indeed, preachers have a moral, ethical, and spiritual responsibility to name this suffering so that congregations can begin—or continue—the process of reckoning with the painful and shameful history of the church and its racist legacy. More specifically, clergy in predominantly white congregations are especially obligated to “take responsibility for educating one another. . . We need to do our own work, and we need to do it in our faith communities,” (4).

So what can the ELCA do to better support its pastors in addressing social issues, especially race and ethnicity?

It’s not enough just to diagnose the problem of White Fragility in the ELCA.  We also need to identify possible remedies.  Based on my research, here are 5 recommendations.

1 – Create clergy groups or networks

When asked where they receive support and encouragement for addressing social issues, respondents named “clergy groups or networks” as number one. 49% of ELCA clergy serving white congregations said they received “significant support” from their peers and networks.  But the number was even higher (54%) for clergy serving diverse congregations.  From this, we might extrapolate that one of the factors that can lead to more ELCA clergy dismantling the White Fragility in the ELCA is having more peer-learning and support groups for clergy to do this work.

Photo by Aarón Blanco Tejedor on Unsplash

2 – Increase denominational support

Support from the denomination was the second most important source of encouragement for addressing social issues, according to the survey.  27% of clergy serving white congregations said they received “significant” support from their denomination for addressing social issues.  But for clergy serving more diverse congregations, it jumped to 35%.

Thus, we might conclude that when bishops and synodical leaders offer continuing education, clergy support groups, educational resources, and one-on-one mentoring, their pastors might feel more supported in deconstructing White Fragility in the ELCA.  Using a resource such as Carolyn Helsel’s Anxious to Talk About It: Helping White Christians Talk Faithfully about Racism and its companion volume, Preaching about Racism: A Guide for Faith Leaders is a good place to start.  

3 – Build out seminary education

A third of ELCA clergy (30%) indicated that they did not feel that their theological education adequately prepared them to address social issues in preaching and teaching. But this drops to 20% for clergy ages 21 – 40, indicating that seminaries have improved in this regard.  Overall, 20% of clergy serving white congregations said seminaries were a source of “significant support” for addressing social issues.  But that number was 12 points higher (32%) for those serving diverse congregations.

From this we can surmise that seminaries can contribute to efforts of dismantling White Fragility in the ELCA by offering both courses for current seminarians as well as continuing education for clergy, particularly for those serving white congregations.

4 – Equip more than clergy for the work of addressing anti-racism

When asked how much support they receive from congregational leaders, the responses were mixed.  13% of clergy serving white congregations said they received “significant support.” But that number increases to 24% for clergy serving diverse congregations.  From this, we can ascertain that having the backing of congregational leaders can increase the likelihood of pastors willing to address White Fragility in the ELCA.

Thus, denominations and seminaries should make continued efforts to equip lay leaders for this work so that clergy are not taking on this task by themselves.

5 – Empower the deacons

One respondent commented, “I wish there were more Deacons in the ELCA to take the lead or assist pastors in this work.” Deacons are faith leaders who are ordained to the ministry of word and service (as compared to those ordained to word and sacrament ministry).  Deacons are equipped for teaching, advocacy, and many other areas of public theology.

Perhaps a cadre of deacons could be trained to help white congregations move out of their white fragility. They could help churches usher in a courageous ministry of cultural competence, antiracism, and advocacy or activism.

Now is the time to right the wrongs

From Aug. 8-12, the ELCA will hold its Churchwide Assembly in Columbus, OH.  The Assembly is the primary decision-making body of the church.  This assembly’s theme is “Embody the Word.”  As bishops, clergy, and laity gather to consider this theme, how much will they account for the bodies of those with varying shades of black and brown skin tones?  To what extent will White Fragility in the ELCA impede calls and actions for an antiracist reformation within this denomination?

As a lifelong ELCA Lutheran, an ordained word and sacrament minister for more than two decades, a seminary professor, and a researcher, I call on the church to right the wrongs.  We must equip our bishops, synods, clergy, deacons, lay leaders, and congregations to be honest about White Fragility in the ELCA.  Naming racism and white supremacy is only the first step.  We must dismantle policies that adversely affect clergy and congregations of color.  And we have to de-couple our denomination from the Corporate Captivity of the ELCA which relies on a colonialist model of governance and polity.

The Corporate Captivity of the ELCA

Now is the time to right the wrongs.  Surely, our Lutheran precepts of law and gospel and a theology of the cross are strong enough for this work.  The question is, are we?

May God’s will for justice, equity, diversity and inclusion give us the courage for this work.

Read also:

The ELCA’s Whiteness Protection Program: Bishop Eaton and Bishop Rohrer

We’re a Sanctuary Church, ELCA, Now What? An Invitation to Dialogue

The Parable of the Talents Through the Lens of Race, Privilege & Wealth


*Thanks to my research team members

The team members that helped with this research were the Rev. Dr. Amanda Wilson Harper, Associate Professor of Sociology at Tarleton State University, Dr. Wayne Thompson, Professor of Sociology at Carthage College, and the Rev. Dr. Katie Day, Charles A. Scheiren Professor Emerita of Church in Society at United Lutheran Seminary.


The Rev. Dr. Leah D. Schade is the Associate Professor of Preaching and Worship at Lexington Theological Seminary in Kentucky and ordained in the ELCA. Dr. Schade does not speak for LTS or the ELCA; her opinions are her own.  She is the author of Preaching in the Purple Zone: Ministry in the Red-Blue Divide (Rowman & Littlefield, 2019) and Creation-Crisis Preaching: Ecology, Theology, and the Pulpit (Chalice Press, 2015). She is the co-editor of Rooted and Rising: Voices of Courage in a Time of Climate Crisis (Rowman & Littlefield, 2019).  Her latest book, co-written with Jerry Sumney is Apocalypse When?: A Guide to Interpreting and Preaching Apocalyptic Texts (Wipf & Stock, 2020).

Twitter@LeahSchade

Facebookhttps://www.facebook.com/LeahDSchade/


Browse Our Archives

Close Ad