Atheists Promoting Bible Study?

Atheists Promoting Bible Study? March 8, 2012

You know we’re living in an odd world when atheists encourage people to read scripture. 50,000 people a day sample science blogger PZ MyersPharyngula posts. “There’s no surer way to make an atheist than to get someone to actually read the Bible,” says Myers.

Here is why: Genesis 6 and 7, for example, tell of God planning and executing the slaughter of billions of innocent animals and millions of children in Noah’s flood. In the words of one distraught parent, “A few weeks ago I read my son a book on Noah’s Ark and my brain started to hurt. It just never really hit me before how truly awful this story is.” Sometimes it is the kids themselves who notice the disparity between the morality portrayed in a holy book and the morality they (and their modern culture) take for granted. Author Nancy Ellen Abrams recounts her run-in with ancient scripture as a child:

“My career in Hebrew school began and ended in the second grade. The first story we read was about Abraham smashing all the merchandise in his father’s religious idol store, and we were supposed to sympathize with Abraham when his father consequently threw him out. The next story was about Abraham not batting an eyelash at taking his son to a mountaintop to kill him. This was too much for me. ‘Who is Isaac supposed to pray to?’ I asked, in perhaps a less than respectful tone of voice. This question elicited an icy stare and a long silence. I was never called on again and eventually I stopped going. That was the end of my Hebrew education.”

The brutality of ancient scripture is indeed an inconvenient truth — a truth that outspoken atheists are all too happy to point out. Consider: Deuteronomy 3:2-6 and 7:1-2 has God commanding the ethnic cleansing of millions of inhabitants of Canaan, including women and children. And the Book of Revelation has God in the future, with the assistance of Jesus, once again brutally torturing countless animals and human beings of all ages, including children.

Nearly a decade ago, I myself was taken aback when a churchgoer lent me an audiocassette book by one of the earliest “New Atheists“: Michael Scott Earl. My wife and I had already been shaken by listening to Earl’s first audiobook, Bible Stories Your Parents Never Taught You. Listening to his second, The Ultimate Terrorist, was even more painful. I shall never forget one dusk, watching the full moon rise straight ahead while driving eastward across Ohio. Earl was speaking these words:

“If we want to know why people kill in the name of God, and why they have been doing so for thousands of years, we must face one simple and obvious fact that almost nobody wants to confront. The fact is this: the God of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam — the God of monotheism — is a terrorist. This is not mere hyperbole on my part; it is an easily verifiable fact. For example, the U.S. Department of Defense defines terrorism as ‘the calculated use of violence or the threat of violence to inculcate fear; intended to coerce or to intimidate others in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideological.'”

“When we look at an event like the conquest of Canaan, the massacres of millions of women and children, we must not lose sight of the fact that these actions were carried out in response to orders from God. The Bible makes that absolutely clear. When we read the brutal Law of Moses, where people’s brains are being bashed in with rocks for breaking the Sabbath, for having sex with the wrong people, for believing the wrong things: all of these atrocious laws can be traced back to God. And when we read in scripture about hell, about billions of unbelievers being tortured in fire for all eternity — it is God who is orchestrating all of this. God employs the calculated use of violence or the threat of violence to inculcate fear — and he does it for religious reasons. In anybody’s book, that’s terrorism.”

So long as the Bible is seen as an unfailing moral guide and the sole, authoritative source of our images and metaphors of the divine, it should come as no surprise that a thousand people a day are walking away from evangelical churches, (also see here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here), that liberal churches are shrinking even faster, and that the ranks of atheists and secularists are swelling. So here’s my vision: Thinking of “divine revelation” in mere mythic ways will last a few more decades. But knowing that God (Reality) communicates more clearly through evidence than ancient texts will change everything. Christianity itself will have a born-again experience by mid-century.

Looking back a hundred years from now, few things will be seen to have had a greater positive impact than the “Evidential Reformation” and the transformation that occurred when Christian leaders worldwide began teaching and preaching how “God’s Word” is not limited to the Bible but is revealed in every fact discovered by science. Practically overnight the science versus religion war will end, and the Church will not only regain its moral authority but will become an inspiring force for evolutionary and ecological good in the world.

This post originally appeared on my HuffPost blog, here, where it has generated more than 160 comments (as of 3-8-2012).

"This was an awesome post! It really gave me a new perspective on relationships and ..."

Loss and Redemption in Relationships

Browse Our Archives

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • “Annie”

    Yes. When you translate it from Greek and Hebrew and put it ‘in’ historical and social context … And you realize how much is metaphor, myth and tribal storytelling, it boggles the mind how Antony one has the hubis to literalize their narrow, uncritical interpretation. It’s sheer psychological projection and it isn’t pretty.

  • Alan

    Heaven forbid we look at reality to get a clue about ultimate reality!

    It saddens me that people would rather get another person’s opinion about reality than to experience reality on their own. That’s like saying, “God doesn’t speak to people nowadays but He used to speak to a few people long ago, so today we have to live off of the scraps of the words He spoke long ago and accept those words as sufficient for all our needs. Those words are all we’ve got to live on.” It’s like choosing to eat from a bag of crumbs while seated at a banquet.

  • Too bad everyone is neglecting the verse right before where it says “there was complete wickedness in the land”. The entire human race may have had nephilim blood, except Noah’s family. The only time God is completely merciless is when it comes to Nephilim hybrids.

    • Theophile

      Hi Ant Writes,
      Good points, and there’s good evidence those hybrids only lost their physical bodies in the deluge, and go by the name “demons” today.

      • There’s even more evidence that it didn’t happen.

  • The Bible is not an easy read and should never be thought of as a ‘Pollyanna’ of life. Violence in scripture, after much prayer and study, seems to be more a consequence of wrong headed thoughts, ideas, actions or behaviors. Even in the sacking of Canaan, God’s idea was to use the native’s fear of the “Chosen People of God”, along with Bees and such to get the Canaanites to submit or evacuate. Hebrew greed interfered with much of this plan. So to cut to the quick, The Egyptian Eunuch on his way home, apparently an educated man, needed Philip to explain the old testament or Torah to him whereby he immediately wanted to be baptised and immediately!

  • I agree that God is evident everywhere. The Bible does not denounce science, it denounces witchcraft. And science certainly does not disprove the Bible. God is the creator of all. God bless!

  • Ian Wrisley

    I’m a little puzzled at the notions expressed in the article and some comments of millions of people. Hardly seems historically likely. I think the reason so many religious people insist on defending the scripture is that the depiction of God in the text is mistaken for God.

  • reason_rules

    Yes, atheist should read the bible. It’s a good idea to actually know what your talking about. Everyone should put thing into context.
    Here’s a little test to see how good you are?