Abortion Pill Reversal Rights Under Fire In Colorado

A court decision about the Abortion Pill Reversal (APR) process in the state of Colorado resulted in significant penalties to the state – image courtesy of Vecteezy.com.

Last week, a court ruled in favor of a healthcare system in Colorado providing abortion pill reversal services. These services are under review in several states. Let’s take a look.

The Colorado Case

Colorado attempted the nation’s first ban against abortion pill reversal (APR), but federal courts struck it down as unconstitutional. This forces the state to pay over $5.4 million in legal fees:

Bella Health was providing abortion‑pill‑reversal (APR) services in Colorado.
Colorado passed a 2023 law labeling APR as “unprofessional conduct” and attempted to ban it outright.
Federal courts blocked the ban, ruling it violated First Amendment rights of Catholic medical providers who offer progesterone‑based APR.
Bella Health engaged the Becket Fund as its primary legal counsel. The Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) was also involved in the same lawsuit, but they represented a separate APR provider (Chelsea Mynyk), not Bella itself.
Colorado must now pay $5.4M to The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty and $700K to Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) for legal fees.
At least 18 women successfully carried pregnancies to term after receiving APR during the litigation.

Which Other States are Pursuing Similar Litigation?

Other states continue to challenge or regulate APR, while pro‑life clinics defend it as a protected medical and religious practice. Most of these states are trying to enforce a ban on the abortion pill, so this litigation would impact APR indirectly:

South Dakota – Abortion pills are illegal in the state, which indirectly restricts APR access.
Wyoming – Attempting to ban the abortion pill, which would effectively ban APR.
Louisiana, Texas, Florida, Missouri, Kansas, Idaho – No APR bans, but the legal climate is hostile to medication‑abortion‑related care.

The following states have APR Legislation in place without any pending litigation:

Arizona
Arkansas
Idaho
Kentucky
Nebraska
South Dakota
Tennessee
Utah
Louisiana.

The following states require clinics to tell women that APR may be possible:

Arizona, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Louisiana, and Kansas.
Indiana, Montana, North Dakota, and Kansas – Some of their laws are blocked by litigation.

Why the Contention Around Abortion Pill Reversal?

Colorado challenged the Abortion Pill Reversal process and lost – image courtesy of Vecteezy.com.

There are objections raised against abortion‑pill reversal (APR). The primary argument against this has been “lack of scientific data” to support the procedure. As previously mentioned, at least 18 women carried to full term and had healthy babies after the reversal. Other objections come from different perspectives:

Ethical – Some view it as unethical to offer a treatment without strong evidence.
Legal and Regulatory Objections:
- Informed‑consent laws about APR are compelled speech – Opponents argue that requiring doctors to tell women that APR is possible violates the First Amendment rights of Physicians and impacts “medical-professional autonomy.”
- APR laws interfere with the state’s regulatory authority – Some state medical boards argue that legislatures shouldn’t dictate medical practice.
Philosophical / Ideological Objections”
- APR undermines the abortion‑rights framework.
- APR is part of a broader pro‑life strategy.
Procedural / Safety Objections – APR may disrupt the standard abortion protocol and increase risk to the patient.
Institutional Concerns – APR is outside mainstream medical guidelines and is not incorporated into medical guidebooks.

The Catholic View

As Catholics, we believe God gives us life, and only God can take it away. We believe in the dignity of every human person as they are children of God. When a human life is ended by human choice—whether through abortion, murder, capital punishment, or euthanasia—we interrupt the story God was still writing in that person. Every life holds a purpose known only to God, and when we cut that life short, the good that might have unfolded remains unfinished; the timeline of His grace is interrupted.

It is a sad state of affairs that we need a procedure to try to undo a human choice. Thankfully, at least 18 children survived this horrific procedure and were given the opportunity for life. We do know that there are hundreds of thousands of babies aborted annually that do not get that opportunity. Grace unfolds across years, not moments.

Please share your thoughts about this article in the “Comments” section.

Peace

If you like this article, you might enjoy:

Preventable Tragedy in Minnesota
January 6 Capitol Riot: Where Do We Go From Here?
Is Society Trying to Rewrite the Holy Gospel?