The Supremes rule on “bad words” on TV

The Supremes rule on “bad words” on TV May 1, 2009

The Supreme Court ruled that the FCC can indeed fine broadcasters for airing expletives on television:

The Supreme Court ruled narrowly Tuesday in favor of a government policy that threatens broadcasters with fines over the use of even a single curse word on live television, yet stopped short of deciding whether the policy violates the Constitution.

In six separate opinions totalling 69 pages, the justices signaled serious concerns about the constitutionality of the Federal Communications Commission’s “fleeting expletives” policy, but called on a federal appeals court to weigh whether it violates First Amendment guarantees of free speech.

The court punted on the free speech issue, though that would seem to be the heart of the matter. Linguistically, “bad word” are interesting, since they have a function that goes beyond their literal meaning, a “phatic” dimension in which a word in itself is an act of aggression or abuse.

"You are missing that the word "cares" has two senses. In the sense of actually ..."

DISCUSSION: Trump’s “Deal” on Abortion
"This reminds me of the "Missouri compromise", and other attempts to keep the states satisfied ..."

DISCUSSION: Trump’s “Deal” on Abortion
"I think that line you quote is pretty ridiculous, really. Trump is vitally interested in ..."

DISCUSSION: Trump’s “Deal” on Abortion
"I never seriously took Trump as pro-life. He was willing to make that trade to ..."

DISCUSSION: Trump’s “Deal” on Abortion

Browse Our Archives