When the movie is better than the book

When the movie is better than the book

This grew out of a conversation I had yesterday with a student over lunch. He was talking about why the books are nearly always better than the movies that are made based on them. I said that this is true, but there are some cases in which the movie is actually better than the book.

The example I gave was “Peter Pan.” The book, by J. M. Barrie, has all of the Victorian vices of sentimentalism and child-worshipping, and I find it unreadable. (As Chesterton said, Barrie’s central conceit of a boy who doesn’t want to grow up is the fantasy of an adult, not a child. Actual children can’t wait to grow up!)

Another: “The Wizard of Oz.”

I have another one in mind, but I’ll see if you can come up with it. What are some other movies that are better than the book?

"Brother Gene - once again you have made my old heart glad. Thank you for ..."

The Texas Floods & Christ
"I've now read Andrew Klavan's "The Kingdom of Cain" twice. I don't suppose his argument ..."

The Texas Floods & Christ
"Kinda like Social Security."

Monday Miscellany, 7/14/25
"I know they have. That's been my criticism of the ADL for years. You seemed ..."

Monday Miscellany, 7/14/25

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!