“Fairness” and “Common sense”

“Fairness” and “Common sense”

Two articles take apart the language of political rhetoric:

Arthur Brooks examines the way the Democrats invoke the concept of “fairness” and shows that there is more to justice than just taking from the rich: Obama says it’s only ‘fair’ to raise taxes on the rich. He’s wrong. – The Washington Post.

Then, from the other side, Sophia Rosenfeld critiques the way  Republicans are invoking the concept of “common sense”: Beware of Republicans bearing ‘common sense’

In a day when reason is widely rejected and political discourse has become reduced to manipulative rhetoric, is political debate just a matter of who gets control of the language?  Can you think of other examples of this sort of thing?

"The disagreement between what Gene said about "everyone a minister" and what you correctly point ..."

The Priesthood of All Believers & ..."
"That is exactly what I suspected. Thanks for checking and confirming!"

The Priesthood of All Believers & ..."
"Google Lens tells me its the Tetragrammaton (YHWH)."

The Priesthood of All Believers & ..."
"Exactly. Barfield is not promoting a reductionistic/dualistic view. He is calling western thinking back from ..."

Owen Barfield on Resurrecting Language & ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


TAKE THE
Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the shortest verse in the Bible?

Select your answer to see how you score.