House votes to ban tax-payer money for abortion

House votes to ban tax-payer money for abortion February 3, 2014

The House of Representatives passed a bill that bans the use of tax-payer money to pay for abortions. (I thought something like that was already in place, but this law is apparently stronger.) Of course, it will never get past the Democratic-majority Senate or the President’s veto pen–the current Democratic party being compassionate to everyone except the unborn–but still. . . .

From House Passes Bill to Completely Ban Taxpayer Funding of Abortions | LifeNews.com:

The House today approved legislation that will put in place a complete ban on taxpayer funding of abortions that ensures abortions are not directly funded in any federal governmental program or department.

The legislation combines several policies that must be enacted every year in Congressional battles and puts them into law where they will not be in jeopardy of being overturned every time Congress changes hands from pro-life lawmakers to those who support abortions.

The House voted 227-188 for the bill with 221 Republicans and 6 Democrats voting to ban taxpayer funding of abortions under HR7 while 187 Democrats and one Republican voted against it. [ROLL CALL at end of story.]

Congressman Tom price said during the debate: “This legislation prohibits taxpayer funding of elective abortions, no matter where in the federal system that might occur. This is a position supported by the majority of Americans in a bipartisan manner. We have a responsibility, through our government, to protect the most vulnerable among us, not the least of whom are the unborn. This bill is an important step in the right direction.”

"I didn't go to Kindergarten, but I don't remember ever having a class like this, ..."

“White Rural Rage”
"Okay, you don't like her personal politics. But hey, who else do you know who ..."

“White Rural Rage”
"Listened to the entire thing. 2/3 of it was interesting and then at 41:00 she ..."

“White Rural Rage”
"I was wondering why Jacobs' argument sounds so familiar. Then I remembered this book from ..."

“White Rural Rage”

Browse Our Archives