Totalitarian discourse

Totalitarian discourse April 14, 2014

Charles Krauthammer gives the name for handling disagreements by silencing and punishing those who hold opposing ideas:

The left is entering a new phase of ideological agitation — no longer trying to win the debate but stopping debate altogether, banishing from public discourse any and all opposition.The proper word for that attitude is totalitarian. It declares certain controversies over and visits serious consequences — from social ostracism to vocational defenestration — upon those who refuse to be silenced.

Sometimes the word comes from on high, as when the president of the United States declares the science of global warming to be “settled.” Anyone who disagrees is then branded “anti-science.” And better still, a “denier” — a brilliantly chosen calumny meant to impute to the climate skeptic the opprobrium normally reserved for the hatemongers and crackpots who deny the Holocaust.

Then last week, another outbreak. The newest closing of the leftist mind is on gay marriage. Just as the science of global warming is settled, so, it seems, are the moral and philosophical merits of gay marriage.

To oppose it is nothing but bigotry, akin to racism. Opponents are to be similarly marginalized and shunned, destroyed personally and professionally.

Like the CEO of Mozilla who resigned under pressure just 10 days into his job when it was disclosed that six years earlier he had donated to California’s Proposition 8, which defined marriage as between a man and a woman.

But why stop with Brendan Eich, the victim of this high-tech lynching? Prop 8 passed by half a million votes. Six million Californians joined Eich in the crime of “privileging” traditional marriage. So did Barack Obama. In that same year, he declared that his Christian beliefs made him oppose gay marriage.

Yet under the new dispensation, this is outright bigotry. By that logic, the man whom the left so ecstatically carried to the White House in 2008 was equally a bigot.

The whole thing is so stupid as to be unworthy of exegesis. There is no logic. What’s at play is sheer ideological prejudice — and the enforcement of the new totalitarian norm that declares, unilaterally, certain issues to be closed.

[Keep reading. . . .]

Krauthammer tells about how the Washington Post recently received a petition signed by 110,000 people urging the paper to ban from publication any questioning of global warming.

Plato warned that democracies too can stamp out freedom.  It is possible to live in a democratic society that is also totalitarian.

"No. I become willing to engage with you again once you demonstrate good faith. I ..."

“The Ultimate Showdown between the Power ..."
"Oh I get it. You'll tell me how I'm wrong after I first admit to ..."

“The Ultimate Showdown between the Power ..."
"No, I'm not making the assumption that only one side or party uses identity politics ..."

Becoming a Christian Dissident against Soft ..."
"What is clear from those two statements is that, according to Veith, to be Christian ..."

Becoming a Christian Dissident against Soft ..."

Browse Our Archives