A tale of two reading lists

A tale of two reading lists February 6, 2015

Annie Holmquist compares a middle school reading list from 1908 to one from today.  It isn’t just that the latter is dumbed down in comparison, though it is.  She goes on to analyze the content of what is taught in these two sets of books and the kinds of education they exemplify.

From Jason W. Stevens, Middle School Reading Lists 100 Years Ago vs. Today | The Federalist Papers:

There’s a delightful and true saying, often attributed to Joseph Sobran, that in a hundred years, we’ve gone from teaching Latin and Greek in high school to teaching remedial English in college.

Now comes even more evidence of the steady decline of American educational standards.

Last year, Annie Holmquist, a blogger for better-ed.org, discovered a 1908 curriculum manual in the Minnesota Historical Society archives that included detailed reading lists for various grade levels.

[Keep reading. . . ]

For Annnie Holmquist’s original post, go here.

HT:  Mary Moerbe & Lars Walker

"Here is a verse that brings to mind what Scalfari claimed the Pope said: "And ..."

The Christology of the Pope’s Now-Denied ..."
"I mean, I've already shown you that the first group exists, even on this blogYou ..."

Importing Tyranny
"I think this is the right phenomenological position. How do we experience Christ or the ..."

The Christology of the Pope’s Now-Denied ..."
"For those seeking more insight into 'Who Christ was', I can recommend the writings of ..."

The Christology of the Pope’s Now-Denied ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment