Super-Christians & vows against vocation

Super-Christians & vows against vocation March 18, 2015

In the second in Mission Work’s series on a Lutheran perspective on faith & work, Rev. Adam Roe offers a post entitled No super-Christians.  He discusses Luther’s reaction against the view that those who want to be particularly spiritual–“super-Christians”–would become monks, nuns, or priests.  These were considered callings from God–“vocations”–while lay occupations were not.

I would add that the specific way that a person became a “super-Christian” contributed to the problem:  A person who sought to become “religious” took–and still takes–vows. 

The vow of celibacy repudiated not just sex but marriage and parenthood.  The vow of poverty repudiated economic activity, except for the collective enterprises of the church.  The vow of obedience meant in Luther’s time that the “religious” person need obey only the church hierarchy and not secular governments, whose jurisdiction applied only to denizens of “the world.”

Luther taught that what these vows rejected are, in fact, themselves holy callings from God.  Thus, Christians have multiple vocations in the family (marriage, parenthood), contrary to the vow of celibacy; the workplace (participation in the economic order), contrary to the vow of poverty; and the social order (the state, the community, the culture), contrary to the vow of obedience.


"Sven, you're being duplicitous in your argument here. Mr. Veith's blog post and the NYTimes ..."

Was America’s True Founding the Introduction ..."
"True enough. I never said that Conservatives were pure in this. But I'll bet that ..."

Was America’s True Founding the Introduction ..."
"We did address it is past tense, completed action. It is not the same as ..."

Was America’s True Founding the Introduction ..."
"A lot of people do not know that Native Americans fought on both sides of ..."

Was America’s True Founding the Introduction ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment