In an interview with Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC), who is considering a presidential run as a foreign policy war hawk, George Will sums up what went wrong with Hillary Clintonโs diplomacy in Libya and gives us a useful term:ย โprogressive imperialism.โ
From George Will, The two issues that would bedevil Lindsey Grahamโs campaign โ The Washington Post:
Secretary of State Clinton helped initiate a protracted assassination attempt โ eight months of chasing Moammar Gaddafi with fighter-bombers. This exercise in regime change succeeded in decapitating Libyaโs government. It was, however, progressive imperialism, supposedly humanitarian muscularity untainted by any clear and substantial U.S. national interest. Hence its appeal to a liberal administration, which neglected to ask the question conservatives have learned to ask before going abroad in search of monsters to destroy: โBut then what?โ
Now we know what. Libya is a failed state incubating radical Islamists.
In 2016, when Clinton is asked about her complicity in this calamity, she might say, โWhat difference, at this point, does it make?โ Graham will be unable to press the point effectively. Eight years after the hard lessons of Iraq, he, too, supported violent regime change in Libya. His primary regret was that insufficient U.S. force was employed. In a joint statement with Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), Graham said: โAmericans can be proud of the role our countryโ played, except for โthe failure of the United States to employ the full weight of our air power.โ
Graham did urge taking responsibility for the aftermath: โLetโs get on the ground and help the Libyan people establish a democracy.โ Democracyโs prerequisites were, however, as lacking there as they were in Iraq, where we should have learned the perils of โnation-building,โ and how discordant that project is with all conservative precepts.
ย