Supreme Court lifts stay on travel ban & will hear the Wedding Cake case

Supreme Court lifts stay on travel ban & will hear the Wedding Cake case June 27, 2017


The Supreme Court re-instated President Trump’s travel ban, in part, and will hear the case in October.

The court also agreed to hear the case of the Colorado baker who was found guilty of discrimination for refusing to bake a wedding cake for a same-sex marriage.  The baker claims that his religious liberty and his freedom of expression were violated.

From Mark Sherman, Trump travel ban partly reinstated; fall court arguments set, Associated Press:

The Supreme Court is allowing the Trump administration to go forward with a limited version of its ban on travel from six mostly Muslim countries, a victory for President Donald Trump in the biggest legal controversy of his young presidency.

The justices will hear full arguments in October in the case that has stirred heated emotions across the nation. In the meantime, the court said Monday that Trump’s ban on visitors from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen can be enforced if those visitors lack a “credible claim of a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States.”

Trump said last week that the ban would take effect 72 hours after being cleared by courts.

The administration has said the 90-day ban was needed on national security grounds to allow an internal review of screening procedures for visa applicants from the six countries. Opponents say the ban is unlawful, based on visitors’ Muslim religion. The administration review should be complete before Oct. 2, the first day the justices could hear arguments in their new term.

A 120-day ban on refugees also is being allowed to take effect on a limited basis.

Three of the court’s conservative justices said they would have let the complete bans take effect.

Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch, said the government has shown it is likely to succeed on the merits of the case, and that it will suffer irreparable harm with any interference. Thomas said the government’s interest in preserving national security outweighs any hardship to people denied entry into the country.

[Keep reading. . .]
From Supreme Court to hear case of baker’s refusal to make wedding cake for gay couple, Fox News:

The U.S. Supreme Court announced Monday it will hear the case of a suburban Denver baker who refused to bake a wedding cake for a gay couple on faith-based grounds, in the latest religious freedom case to be considered before the nation’s highest court.

Jack Phillips, owner of Masterpiece Cakeshop, had refused to sell a customized cake for a gay couple’s union, claiming a religious exemption to the state’s anti-discrimination law.

State courts had ruled against the businessman.

The high court will now decide whether applying Colorado’s public accommodations law to compel the baker to create “expression”– a wedding cake — violates his constitutionally protected Christian beliefs about marriage.

[Keep reading. . .]

"You're awfully blase about a country putting a bunch of brown people into concentration camps."

Importing Tyranny
"At the moment the Chinese appear to be succeeding without significant loss of life. And ..."

Importing Tyranny
"I'm beginning to have dreams of WWI."

“You Are Leaving Us to Be ..."
"Flashback to January 19, 2018, when Mollie Hemingway stated: This may seem like an odd ..."

“You Are Leaving Us to Be ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment