Euthanasia for “a completed life”

Euthanasia for “a completed life” July 3, 2017


First euthanasia was supposed to be for people who were terminally ill. Then for those who were suffering.  First physically, but then mentally. But euthanasia would only be for people who requested it.  Then for those unable to request it.  Including for children.

A new proposal in the Netherlands, the mecca of physician homicide, would allow euthanasia for any healthy person over 75 on the grounds of having had “a completed life.”

But that’s just the beginning.  Euthanasia activists admit that this is only the first step.  (Actually, there have been lots of prior steps.)  The real goal is euthanasia for any adult who wants it.
From Emma Elliott Freire, Netherlands Considers Euthanasia For Healthy People, The Federalist:

Politicians in the Netherlands are discussing the possibility of legalizing euthanasia for healthy people. The proposed “Completed Life Bill” would allow any person age 75 or over who decides their life is “complete” to receive euthanasia. It doesn’t matter if they are otherwise perfectly healthy.

Under current Dutch law, a person only becomes eligible for euthanasia when they have a terminal illness and are suffering unbearably. Pia Dijkstra, an MP for Dutch political party D66, is preparing to introduce the Completed Life Bill. D66 spearheaded most of the groundbreaking socially progressive legislation for which the Netherlands is famous. They are historically a smaller party—they’ve never had a Prime Minister—but they’ve proven themselves to be politically effective.

D66 would eventually like to legalize euthanasia for any adult who wishes to die. They openly admit that the Completed Life Bill is a step towards realizing that goal. In March, D66 leader Alexander Pechtold was confronted on a political talk show by a 57-year-old man who said he wishes to die. He asked why the Completed Life Bill is only persons age 75 and older. “I have to wait 18 more years. I don’t feel like waiting 18 years. I want it now,” he said.

Pechtold replied, “It’s my personal opinion that in our civilization dying is an individual consideration. You didn’t ask to be brought into the world.” He went on to explain that currently there is political support for legalizing euthanasia for healthy elderly persons. “If we want to maintain that support and not disrupt the discussion then we have to take it step-by-step. In 2002 we passed the euthanasia law for unbearable suffering. In my view, Pia Dijkstra can now continue persuading parliament and the country to—in my own words and personal opinion—take the next step for our civilization.”

[Keep reading. . .]

Illustration from Pixabay, CC0, Public Domain

"Making it impossible to copy/paste doesn't stop anyone from manually copying text. And why stop ..."

Evangelical Muslims, Buddhists, and Hindus
"Sorry, I thought that the relevance of this passage was quite obvious to Christian scholars ..."

A Creedal Testimony from Less Than ..."
"Blockchain is easy. Create a massively complex algorithm. Give it a meme worthy name. Get ..."

Evangelical Muslims, Buddhists, and Hindus
"Wow-can you explain EFTs and blockchain to me? :)"

Evangelical Muslims, Buddhists, and Hindus

Browse Our Archives

error: Content is protected !!