Patheos
  • GO
  • Beliefs
    • Buddhist
    • Catholic
    • Contemplative
    • Evangelical
    • General Christian
    • Hindu
    • Jewish
    • Latter-day Saint
    • Muslim
    • New Visions
    • Nonreligious
    • Pagan
    • Progressive Christian
    • More Voices
  • Topics
    • Entertainment
    • Book Club
    • Docs/ology
    • Movie Club
    • Family and Relationships
    • Life Events
    • Politics Blue
    • Politics Red
    • Public Square
    • More Topics
    • Trending Now

    • Identity Politics vs. Transactional Politics
      Gene Veith
    • How Jesus Empowered Women (And Christians Re-Enslaved...
      Keith Giles
  • Columnists
  • Library
    • NEW! Patheos Answers
    • Faith Leaders Database
    • Research Tools
    • Comparison Lens
    • Preacher Resources
    • Teacher Resources
    • Anglican/Episcopalian
    • Baha'i
    • Baptist
    • Buddhism
    • Christianity
    • Confucianism
    • Eastern Orthodoxy
    • Hinduism
    • Holiness and Pentecostal
    • ISKCON
    • Islam
    • Judaism
    • Lutheran
    • Methodist
    • The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
    • New Age
    • Paganism
    • Presbyterian and Reformed
    • Protestantism
    • Roman Catholic
    • Scientology
    • Shi'a Islam
    • Sikhism
    • Sufism
    • Sunni Islam
    • Taoism
    • Zen
    see all religions
  • newsletters
  • Ad-Free LogIn
  • More
    • Pastors and Church Leaders Resource Center

    • Church and ministry leadership resources to better equip, train and provide ideas for today's church and ministry leaders, like you.

      visit section now
    • Resources For the Faith Seeker
    • E-Books and Other Special Offers
    • 7 Day Prayer Challenge for Spouses
    • A Different Kind of Christian
    • Jesus Is Love
    • Pastors and Church Leaders
    • Prayer Devotional
    • The Saints We Love
    • Who Is God?
geneveith
Get newsletters and updates
Close
get the latest from
Cranach
Sign up for our newsletter

Get updates from Cranach delivered straight to your inbox

  • Home
  • About
  • Publications
  • Who is Cranach?
  • FREE NEWSLETTER
Evangelical

Luther and Trump?

April 30, 2018 by Gene Veith
0 Comments
Facebook Twitter Email
Luther and Trump? April 30, 2018 Gene Veith
LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Did Martin Luther give us Donald Trump?  Are Lutherans responsible for getting Trump elected?  This is what some writers are saying.

Whether you think Luther’s alleged complicity with Trump would be a good thing or a bad thing, most of these writers see it as bad.  In doing so, they tend to get Luther wildly wrong.  But in the midst of all of these claims, one writer gives us a very good explanation of Luther’s teachings about politics.

Alec Ryrie in Foreign Policy maintains that Martin Luther Was the Donald Trump of 1517. Rev. Alexander M. Santora, a Catholic priest, wrote an op-ed piece in a New Jersey newspaper entitled Did Martin Luther Spawn Donald Trump?, answering in the affirmative.  Michael Massing, writing in The Nation, explains  How Martin Luther Paved the Way for Donald Trump.

Their point is generally that Luther was a populist, though they then also blame him for urging the princes to crush the peasants’ populist uprising.  They say he was an anti-establishment figure, which is true.  And that he employed Trump-like inflammatory rhetoric, which is a half-truth.  And that he favored brutal government policies, which is not true.

Massing has the most substantive argument.  He says, “Luther also believed in the concept of the ‘two kingdoms,’ the secular and the spiritual, which had to be kept rigorously apart. Christ’s Gospel was to apply only in the spiritual realm; in the secular, the government’s role was to maintain order and punish evildoers, not to show compassion and mercy.”

Massing is right to focus on the doctrine of the Two Kingdoms, but his description distorts its implications.  God is the King of both realms, the secular no less than the secular.  God’s moral law does apply to the secular realm.  In the spiritual realm, those freed by the Gospel of God’s “compassion and mercy” through Christ are free of the Law, though they remain citizens also of the secular realm and are obliged to follow God’s commandments as their faith bears fruit in love for their neighbors.

But even taking Massing’s formulation of the Two Kingdoms as he states it, one would think that he would applaud keeping “the secular and the spiritual. . .rigorously apart.”  Readers of the left-leaning The Nation have been scaring themselves at the prospect of the Christian right establishing a theocracy.  Luther does not keep the secular and the spiritual rigorously apart–the Two Kingdoms actually brings them together under one King–but in distinguishing between these two spheres and making a place for secular rule, he makes theocracy impossible.

Massing’s biggest mistake in his article is his claim that today’s evangelicals, including the Southern Baptists he focuses upon and the Pentecostalists who are enthusiastic about Trump, follow Luther.  They don’t!

As so often happens with British and American commentators, they conflate Luther with Calvin.  Massing even associates Luther with the belief in predestination!  Calvin’s Reformed tradition, which has been extremely influential in England and the United States, for the most part, does not believe in Luther’s Two Kingdoms distinction.  They tend to believe that there is one kingdom and to emphasize Christian influence in the world.  Most of American evangelicalism derives from this tradition, rather than Lutheranism, as did most of today’s Christian political activism.

More intriguing is economist Lyman Stone’s analysis of election data, which credits midwestern Lutherans, in part, for tipping the election to Trump.  He points to the states of “Pennsylvania, which Trump flipped, and Wisconsin, which Trump flipped, and Iowa, which Trump flipped, and rural Minnesota, which Trump came astonishingly close to flipping.”  These states more often vote Democratic, but in the 2016 election, these heavily-Lutheran states switched to Trump, giving him the election.

Specifically and counter-intuitively, Stone credits liberal Lutherans.  “In areas with 35 percent Evangelical Lutheran Church of America adherence, the pro-Trump effect direction is consistent, but the coefficient is even larger. Ten percent ELCA counties had a 4.7 percent swing for Trump; 25 percent ELCA counties had an 8 percent swing for Trump; 35 percent ELCA counties had an 11 percent swing for Trump.”

How could that be? Stone compares the evangelical turnout for Trump with their turnout for Romney in the 2012 election.  Evangelical support for Romney was far greater, even though many had qualms about him because he is a Mormon.  While it is true that the overwhelming majority of evangelicals who voted picked Trump, a significant number, faced with the alternative of Hillary Clinton, opted for “none of the above” and did not vote for president.

The real difference, according to Stone, was the behavior of mainline Protestant voters.  Those denominations, such as the ELCA, are politically very liberal.  They are also in notable decline.  Stone says that part of the weakness of the mainline denominations is that their political influence with their members is diminishing.  Thus the large numbers of voters in ELCA enclaves who turned to Trump.

Now, Lyman Stone, who identifies himself as “a theologically confessional Lutheran and politically conservative Republican,” has also written a perceptive article on Luther’s actual political theology.  We’ll blog about that tomorrow.  (Tip of the Hat to him for putting me onto these Luther as Trump articles.)

The bottom line, for now, is that comparisons between figures of very different ages can never be very accurate.  Our divisions of “liberal” and “conservative” don’t even work for the 19th century.  Was Lincoln “liberal” or “conservative”?  How about Queen Elizabeth I?  Or Cicero?  The questions are meaningless.

At the same time, you can construct analogies between just about any two individuals.  Lincoln is like Trump in wanting to put America first.  Queen Elizabeth I is like Trump in always retaliating against her enemies.  Cicero is like Trump in using language to control a crowd.

At the same time, Lincoln, Queen Elizabeth I, and Cicero–and Luther–are nothing like Trump since they all exist in such radically different times, cultures, and contexts.

 

Illustration by hansbenn via Pixabay, CC0, Creative Commons

 

 

 

 

Facebook Twitter Email
  • Tagged with:
  • Church
  • History
  • Politics
  • Reformation
  • Theology
  • Doctrine of the Two Kingdoms
  • Donald Trump
  • Evangelical Lutheran Church in America
  • evangelicals
  • Luther's political teachings
  • mainline Protestantism
  • Martin Luther
Previous Post
April 30, 2018
Give the Word "Evangelical" Back to the Lutherans!
Next Post
May 1, 2018 NIetzscheans of Both the Left and the Right
Recent Comments
0 | Leave a Comment
"Don't play stupid. If someone says "It's hypocritical to complain that anti-choicers are being forced ..."
BernankeIsGlutenFree
Making Taxpayers Pay for Abortions?
"> It is not clear to me whether in this instance this is something that ..."
BernankeIsGlutenFree
Making Taxpayers Pay for Abortions?
"The comment I upvoted made no mention of abortion. It noted that capital punishment is ..."
Maltnothops
Making Taxpayers Pay for Abortions?
"Then why do you approve of a comment that differentiated between capital punishment and abortion ..."
BernankeIsGlutenFree
Making Taxpayers Pay for Abortions?

Browse Our Archives

get the latest from
Cranach
Sign up for our newsletter



POPULAR AT PATHEOS Evangelical
1
The Cost of Staying Silent
Anxious Bench
2
The Institutions Americans No Longer Believe...
Cranach
3
Masturbatory Worship and the Contemporary Church
Ponder Anew
4
Who Is A "Progressive Christian" and...
Roger E. Olson
Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

Buy Now

Buy Now

Buy Now
See All Titles »
Related posts from Cranach
Evangelical
The Institutions Americans No Longer Believe In
Cranach
Evangelical
The Resurrection, the Sacraments, & the End Times
Cranach
Evangelical
How Christianity Invented the "Person"
Cranach
Evangelical
What Luther Can Offer Evangelicals
Cranach
TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical
Craig's Atonement and the Death of Christ-- Part...
Q. On p. 243 you once more get to the heart of...
Gospel for Asia (GFA World) Launches First-Ever Mission...
WILLS POINT, TX – GFA World founded by K.P. Yohannan, whose heart...
Amazon, Wikipedia, and Scholarly Research
This post offers suggestions for beginning a research project of any kind,...
On Righteous Anger
Some of my more liberal friends will often use the phrase “righteous...
Ad Astra Per Fidem: A Review of Christiana...
As “science fiction” stories go, C.S. Lewis’s Space Trilogy—Out of the Silent...
Honoring Those With Whom You Disagree
Recently, I came across a fascinating remark from George Whitefield regarding John...
view all Evangelical blogs
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Service
  • Do Not Sell My Data
  • Contact Us
  • Follow Us on Facebook
  • Manage Subscriptions
  • Unsubscribe From Notifications
Copyright 2008-2021, Patheos. All rights reserved.
error: Content is protected !!