The UK Supreme Court Rules for Its Christian Bakers

The UK Supreme Court Rules for Its Christian Bakers October 18, 2018

Great Britain has its own Christian bakers who refused to bake a cake in support of the LGBT cause.  And has happened in the American case, the Supreme Court of the land ruled in favor of the baker’s religious liberty.  But the British case is somewhat different.

The Christian owners of Ashers Baking Company [see Genesis 49:20] in Belfast, Northern Ireland, refused to bake a cake featuring Sesame Street characters Bert and Ernie for the International Day Against Homophobia.  On the cake the bakers, Daniel and Amy McArthur, were told to inscribe the words “Support Gay Marriage.”

Because of their refusal, the bakers were charged with discrimination.  Two lower courts ruled against them, but the UK Supreme Court ruled unanimously, 5-0, in their favor.

Why?  Because the bakers were not discriminating against gay people.  They would not have approved of that message (“Support Gay Marriage”) even if it had been requested by a heterosexual.

The bakers were being forced to say something contrary to their beliefs, which is a violation of their religious liberty.

From Kate Shellnutt, Christians Win the Great British Cake Off in Christianity Today:

“The bakers could not refuse to supply their goods to [customer and LGBT activist] Mr. Lee because he was a gay man or supported gay marriage, but that is quite different from obliging them to supply a cake iced with a message with which they profoundly disagreed,” said Supreme Court president Lady Hale, delivering the opinion in the unanimous 5–0 ruling. . . .

“The key outcome of today’s ruling is that no one can be compelled to say anything that they profoundly disagree with,” according to the UK Evangelical Alliance.

The ruling defended the bakers’ protections under the European Convention on Human Rights, saying “…obliging a person to manifest a belief which he does not hold has been held to be a limitation on his article 9(1) rights [freedom of religion or belief]” and “the freedom not to be obliged to hold or manifest beliefs that one does not hold is also protected by article 10 of the Convention [freedom of expression].”

“The court found that there was no discrimination on the grounds of religious belief or political opinion, and ultimately concluded that compelled speech would not have been justified in this case,” said Peter Lynas, director of the Evangelical Alliance Northern Ireland, noting that all charges of discrimination lodged against Ashers owners Daniel and Amy McArthur had been dismissed.

[Read it all. . . ]

For an excellent discussion of this case and how it suggests a way forward in the conflict between religious liberty and non-discrimination, see this post by Tyler O’Neil.

Photo:  Ashers Baking Company, Belfast, Ireland,  by  Albert Bridge , copyrighted and licensed for reuse, Creative Commons 2.0 License


"By Wahhabi Islamist standards, she would be moderate, if not an outright heretic."

Trump’s Prospects
""Though, Gene seems to think that any platform that is too far to the left ..."

Trump’s Prospects
"That is not the truth. Before most people even knew transgender people existed, doctors had ..."

The Babylonian Trick
"Of course you win by winning the middle. The more committed voters are to one ..."

Trump’s Prospects

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment