The First Woke Primary

The First Woke Primary February 13, 2019

The Democratic primary is being conducted in a new climate, that of identity politics, intersectionality, and the necessity to be “woke” (that is, to be sensitive to every nuance of privilege and oppression).

Thus we are already seeing from nearly every candidate a ritual of apology and self-abnegation.  Despite her status as progressive icon, Elizabeth Warren is in trouble for falsely presenting herself as a Native American and thereby appropriating someone else’s culture.  Tulsi Gabbard is having to repent for having once opposed gay marriage.  Kirsten Gillibrand is apologizing for having used the term “illegal alien.”  Kamala Harris, despite otherwise impeccable progressivism, is being questioned because she once served as a prosecutor.

Candidates who identify as white males must do penance for the fact of their privilege.  Socialist Bernie Sanders is being criticized for having shown too little interest in identity politics and for being too supportive of gun rights in Vermont.  Beto O’Rourke is disqualified in the minds of some for accepting oil money, as if such contributions could be avoided in Texas.  Joe Biden was not swayed by Anita Hill and voted for Clarence Thomas for the Supreme Court.

Rich Lowry discusses this phenomenon.  From The Bonfire of the Democrats:

Democrats are about to embark on the first woke primary, a gantlet of political correctness that will routinely wring abject apologies out of candidates and find fault in even the most sure-footed. The passage of time will be no defense. Nor the best of intentions. Nor anything else.

Any lapses will be interpreted through the most hostile lens, made all the more brutal by the competition of a large field of candidates vying for the approval of a radicalized base. The Democrat nomination battle might as well be fought on the campus of Oberlin College and officiated by the director of the Office of Equity, Diversity and Inclusion. . . .

In every presidential campaign, candidates have to explain and backfill to get with the party’s latest program. What will make this process so much more intense for Democrats is the belief that even past mistakes involving the choice of words or symbolism are affirmatively injurious of other people. And the belief that such mistakes represent deep sins to be repented.

Watch for more high school transgressions, embarrassing photos, testimonies of bad behavior, and recordings of words and attitudes not acceptable by today’s unforgiving standards.

Will anyone be good enough?  Will these inquisitions and purity tests make Donald Trump’s cheerful willingness to be offensive look good by comparison?

 

Illustration:  “The Muses Inflicting Penance” by James Gillray [Public domain] via Wikimedia Commons

"Poor assumption on your part. I am theologically conservative, but I could care less about ..."

Conservative Theologically, but Liberal Politically
"We both know there is no "good" racism. But the question of why/how would/could someone ..."

Conservative Theologically, but Liberal Politically
"No, Biden is showing that his PC filters are going out of whack. He is ..."

Conservative Theologically, but Liberal Politically
"Why do you always criticize Cur when he brings up famous naval vessels?"

Conservative Theologically, but Liberal Politically

Browse Our Archives