The new features of despotism

The new features of despotism

William over at the Liberal Morality blog linked to us here (so thanks for that), whereupon I found his post of a remarkable quotation from Alexis de Toqueville:

I am trying to imagine what new features despotism might have in today’s world: I see an innumerable host of men, all alike and equal, endlessly hastening after petty and vulgar pleasures with which they fill their souls. Each of them, withdrawn into himself, is virtually a stranger to the fate of all the others. For him, his children and personal friends comprise the entire human race. As for the remainder of his fellow citizens, he lives alongside them but does not see them. He touches them but does not feel them. He exists only in himself and for himself, and if he still has a family, he no longer has a country.

Over these men stands an immense tutelary power, which assumes sole responsibility for securing their pleasure and watching over their fate. It is absolute, meticulous, regular, provident, and mild. It would resemble paternal authority if only its purpose were the same, namely, to prepare men for manhood. But on the contrary, it seeks only to keep them in childhood irrevocably. It likes citizens to rejoice, provided they think only of rejoicing. It works willingly for their happiness but wants to be the sole agent and only arbiter of that happiness. It provides for their security, foresees and takes care of their needs, facilitates their pleasures, manages their most important affairs, directs their industry, regulates their successions, and divides their inheritances. Why not relieve them entirely of the trouble of thinking and the difficulty of living?

from Alexis de Toqueville, Democracy in America

This was written in 1835! The world would see a lot more of the old style of despotism after de Toqueville’s day. But his book was prescient in many ways, looking as it did deep into the heart of the democratic system and the American spirit. Notice that this is not just a political despotism, it’s a cultural despotism, made possible by our loss of community and character, our preoccupation with security and “vulgar pleasures.” Isn’t this kinder, gentler form of despotism what we have to worry about? And isn’t our country ready and eager for it? Aren’t we already there?

"Are those the only 2 options or are there other ones between doing nothing or ..."

DISCUSS: Should We Attack Iran?
"Should we attack Iran? I don't know. I pray that those who have the actual ..."

DISCUSS: Should We Attack Iran?
"Well silent Cal went to a good college."

The Three Modes of Religion (and ..."
"I'll agree it's a no, but I don't think we would lose. It's just that ..."

DISCUSS: Should We Attack Iran?

Browse Our Archives