Throwing money out of an airplane

Throwing money out of an airplane February 17, 2009

John Maynard Keynes, the New Deal era economist whose theories that the government can and should control the economy are back in vogue, said that to combat an economic slowdown, the government should put more money into the system. Even, he said, if that meant dropping money from an airplane.

In Keynesian thinking, if I am understanding him right, it doesn’t matter what the government spends the money on. In the current stimulus plan, road construction, buildup of government agencies, and even pork barrel projects are all equally valid. They inject money into the economy.

Furthermore, the fact that this is all deficit spending does not matter either. In fact, the government HAS to spend money that it does not have and that does not currently exist. If the government spent what it had, that would do no good for a weak economy, anymore than any other normal circulation of buying and spending. For the government measures to work, by this way of thinking, it’s precisely the money supply that has to increase.

But wouldn’t this be inflationary? Yes! This is part of the remedy. Don’t we need housing prices to go up? Don’t we need the value of assets to increase to meet and eventually surpass the amount of the loans for which they were securities?

I believe this is the theoretical justification for what is happening with the stimulus plan. Is this it? (Help us out, EconJeff.) If so, do you think it has a chance of working? If not, how would you critique this theory?

"A related thing that comes up in fiction a lot is "The villain has a ..."

DISCUSSION: “Then I Prefer My Mother”
"Well, as long as we're all listing our favorites ... pretty much everything by Chaplin, ..."

The Nihilism Beneath the Surface
"You folks all know where to find my opinions on movies. Some favorites of mine ..."

The Nihilism Beneath the Surface
"If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything."

Methodists Gone Wild

Browse Our Archives