Super-Christians & vows against vocation

Super-Christians & vows against vocation

In the second in Mission Work’s series on a Lutheran perspective on faith & work, Rev. Adam Roe offers a post entitled No super-Christians.  He discusses Luther’s reaction against the view that those who want to be particularly spiritual–“super-Christians”–would become monks, nuns, or priests.  These were considered callings from God–“vocations”–while lay occupations were not.

I would add that the specific way that a person became a “super-Christian” contributed to the problem:  A person who sought to become “religious” took–and still takes–vows. 

The vow of celibacy repudiated not just sex but marriage and parenthood.  The vow of poverty repudiated economic activity, except for the collective enterprises of the church.  The vow of obedience meant in Luther’s time that the “religious” person need obey only the church hierarchy and not secular governments, whose jurisdiction applied only to denizens of “the world.”

Luther taught that what these vows rejected are, in fact, themselves holy callings from God.  Thus, Christians have multiple vocations in the family (marriage, parenthood), contrary to the vow of celibacy; the workplace (participation in the economic order), contrary to the vow of poverty; and the social order (the state, the community, the culture), contrary to the vow of obedience.

 

"Lutheran theology is good....in theory, but not in . . . practice.That is not what ..."

A Tale of Two Funerals
"That's because the watchman's job is to stand on the ramparts and announce the approach ..."

A Tale of Two Funerals
"I don't think I mentioned anything I've done or not done (though I have presided ..."

A Tale of Two Funerals

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


TAKE THE
Religious Wisdom Quiz

What Christian group celebrates Mass as their primary form of worship?

Select your answer to see how you score.