Pro-choice stem cell research

Pro-choice stem cell research

New guidelines for stem cell research to receive federal funding have been announced. The eligible stem cell lines had to have been generated following specific ethical guidelines. But what guidelines, you might ask, and what ethics? From The Washington Post:

All embryonic stem cell lines that qualified for federal funding would have to meet a series of ethical requirements: The embryo that was destroyed to create a line must have been discarded after an in vitro fertilization procedure, and the donors must have been informed that the embryo would be destroyed for stem cell research and made fully cognizant of their choices, including donating the embryo to another couple who want a baby. No donors could have been paid for an embryo, and no threats or inducements could have been used to nudge couples toward making a donation.

Notice that the life of the embryo is not even considered. Again, presumably so that the ethics being applied will not conflict with abortion, what makes these procedures ethical is the “choice” of the woman. This is the postmodernist approach to ethics, which makes the will–not the intellect or transcendent moral truth or any objective principles or considerations, including scientific facts–the only determinant of moral “constructions.”
"Post-modernism, at its best, is a movement against blind trust. It's a movement to humble ..."

What Comes After the Knowledge System ..."
"This post has so much generalizing going on that I can't even get my arms ..."

What Comes After the Knowledge System ..."
"More like as opposed to an age where stoopidity was not ascendant. The propr era ..."

What Comes After the Knowledge System ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!