Different Ways of Classifying Christians

Different Ways of Classifying Christians

Carl Trueman, in the course of his post If Only Francis Were Luther that we blogged about yesterday made an intriguing point about how there are many different ways of classifying Christians:

There are many ways of dividing up the various traditions that claim the name “Christian.” One is the classic Roman Catholic–Protestant divide over the issue of authority. A more subtle distinction is between those who regard Christianity as fundamentally dogmatic and those who regard it as essentially pragmatic. In view of the latter, we might make the case for setting Martin Luther and Newman in the same stream. They did at least agree that Christian faith was dogmatic and that the issue of authority was of central importance for this reason.

Prof. Trueman goes on to make the point is that Pope Francis agrees with Erasmus that Christianity should be more about kindness than dogma, love more than faith.  The same could be said of others who, as they say, identify themselves as Christians, including factions within denominations and congregations.

This got me thinking of other ways of drawing the lines, “of dividing up the various traditions that claim the name ‘Christian.'”

We are most familiar with Protestants and Catholics.  That leaves out the Orthodox, who are sometimes called “Eastern Catholics,” though their home seems to be in the Evangelical Channel here at Patheos.

We could make the distinction between Monergists, those who believe that God accomplishes everything for our salvation (Lutherans, Calvinists) and Synergists, those who believe that we must co-operate with God in our salvation (Catholics, Arminians, Pentecostalists, most Evangelicals).

Also between Sacramental Christians, for whom Baptism and Holy Communion are efficacious (Catholics, Orthodox, Lutherans, Anglicans) and Non-Sacramental Christians, for whom these rites are essentially symbolic and secondary (Calvinists, Arminians, evangelicals, Pentecostalists, liberal Protestants).

A distinction already being made is that between Conservatives (Lutheran Church Missouri Synod, Presbyterian Church of America, Southern Baptists, Wesleyans, Pentecostalists; Anglican Church in North America, conservative Catholics) and Liberals (Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, Presbyterian Church USA, American Baptists, United Methodists; Episcopalians, liberal Catholics).

We could distinguish between churches that are pro-life (Catholics, Orthodox, evangelicals, Pentecostals, conservatives) and those that are pro-abortion (mainline Protestants).

Notice the strange bedfellows and the curious potential alliances.

Can you think of other classifications?

 

Illustration:  Collage of Famous Christians By Jobas – self-made from cropped versions of:Other photos. Creative Commons:  CC BY-SA 4.0.   via Wikipedia, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=45280451.  For the identification of individual photos go here.

 

 

 

 

"I think Newsom is actually doing a good job in opposing and showing Trump up. ..."

DISCUSS: Completely Realigning Baseball
"My only question is whether defining human nature to be whatever we want it to ..."

How to Make Natural Law Arguments
"If it is true as Jeremiah reminds us that : the heart is deceitful above ..."

How to Make Natural Law Arguments
"I don't mean to disagree with any of this, but I'm a little uncomfortable with ..."

How to Make Natural Law Arguments

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


TAKE THE
Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the king of Babylon when Daniel was in the lions’ den?

Select your answer to see how you score.