Republicans can’t stop confirmation of left wing judge

Republicans can’t stop confirmation of left wing judge

Republican senators tried a filibuster against President Obama’s left wing nominee for a judgeship on the federal court of appeals, but Democrats thwarted the tactic.

Democrats on Tuesday crushed a Senate filibuster against a controversial appeals court nominee, demonstrating to Republicans they can't stop President Barack Obama from turning the federal judiciary to the left.

The 70-29 vote limited debate over the qualifications of U.S. District Judge David Hamilton of Indiana, and assured his elevation to the Chicago-based appeals court. Sixty votes were needed to end the filibuster, but confirmation only requires a simple majority of the 100-member Senate.

Ten Republicans repudiated their own party leaders and voted to limit debate. The Obama administration made a crucial decision from the outset by getting the support of Hamilton's home-state Republican senator, Richard Lugar.

The vote emphatically warned Republicans that with only 40 senators, they're too outnumbered to prevent Obama from making major inroads into a judiciary that was populated over eight years with conservative judges chosen by President George W. Bush.

Republicans have objected to holding a vote on Hamilton's confirmation since June, when the Judiciary Committee reported his nomination favorably to the full Senate.

Conservative Republican senators and their judicial-watching outside groups then launched a major political assault on Hamilton.

They criticized his rulings against Christian prayers in the Indiana legislature and against a menorah in the Indiana Municipal Building's holiday display.

Conservatives were furious that Hamilton struck down part of an Indiana law requiring women to make two trips to a clinic for counseling before they could get an abortion. He said the requirement placed an undue burden on a woman's constitutional right to choose to end a pregnancy. . . .

Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., who led the opposition to Hamilton, argued that Hamilton's record met his definition of extraordinary circumstances.

He not only attacked Hamilton's judicial record, but criticized his work in the distant past: vice president for litigation and board member of the American Civil Liberties Union in Indiana; and a fundraiser for two months for the Association of Community Organizatons for Reform Now (ACORN).

Recall that this is exactly what conservatives warned would happen if President Obama were elected: a new generation of leftist judges with lifetime appointments.

"Here's a coincidence. The NYT's Ezra Klein has posted an interview today with Stuart Brand. ..."

The Dignity of the Work AI ..."
"You cannot be a good writer unless you learn rules of grammar, spelling and read ..."

The Dignity of the Work AI ..."
"I've been looking for online work recently, and most of the jobs that seem to ..."

The Dignity of the Work AI ..."
"I see connections between this post and the thesis of Biermann's A Case for Character: ..."

The Dignity of the Work AI ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


TAKE THE
Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Pentecost" mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.