I read somewhere that to see the cultural influence of Lutheranism, you need to look not at Germany, but at the Scandinavian countries of Denmark, Sweden, Norway, and Finland.
Though throughout its history Germany has had lots of Lutherans, it also has had lots of Catholics, Reformed, and Anabaptists. The Scandinavian countries, though, embraced the Reformation while Luther was still alive, and until the middle of the 19th century their kings would not permit any other religion except Lutheranism.
So Lutheran ways of thinking and acting put down deep roots into Scandinavian culture. That includes the doctrine of vocation.
In the second of this week’s posts inspired by readers, I’d like to draw your attention to a comment at AI Watch, pt. 1 made by book and pop culture reviewer SKJAM! He wrote, referring to a Tumblr post, “Someone who isn’t currently a practicing Lutheran but is a Scandinavian talking about how the doctrine of vocation has affected the work culture of Scandinavia.”
So going to Tumblr, I found this fascinating conversation. (I’m not editing out the mistakes.):
From thehmn:
I’ve only ever heard about The Lutheran Work Ethic as something negative but I recently talked to someone who saw it as one of the explanations for why Scandinavia has such high trust societies in workplaces.
The philosophy is “The Lutheran work ethic, rooted in Martin Luther’s theology, defines secular labor as a “calling” (Beruf) and a divine act of service to the neighbor, rather than a means to earn salvation. It elevates ordinary work to a sacred status, encouraging diligence, stewardship, and community focus as ways to love others and express faith.”
Nowadays this is usually interpreted online as you have to work to have worth and it sorta stops there, but the woman I talked with also theorized that this is why it’s not just insulting but even illegal to distrust your employees to the point of drug testing them or setting traps for them to see if they’ll do the right thing here.
We’re not as religious as we used to be but our societies were build on the Lutheran faith and as such work is supposed to be for the greater good of our communities and to accuse us of not doing our divine part that we were hired to do is beyond insulting. You might as well call us a heretic. Businesses that were successful in other countries have failed in Scandinavia because they didn’t trust their employees enough and people quit.
This is not to diminish the negative sides to this sort of work ethic but it was an interesting view of it I hadn’t thought about before. Over the years I’ve had many different employers and while some were bigger sticklers for the rules than others, their general attitude has definitely been more on the “as long as you get your job done I don’t really care how or when” side.
Then moriaddty chimes in:
I have not interfaced with any of the theology/philosophy behind lutherian work ethic, but from what youve written, wouldn’t lutherian work ethic also mean that discriminating against any job (like often is done for a lot of menial work or service work, often incorrectly called “lower” or “unskilled”, at least thats how it is in germany sadly, probably varies from country to country which jobs are seen as “lesser”) is kind of an act of blasphemy? Bc if doing ones job/calling is a divine act, judging someone elses act is smth only god has a right to kind of? Because that would be like judging someones prayer to be unworthy? Im not religious either, only had like religion education in school bc its interesting, so my thinking might be completly off. But regardless the trust thing that absolutely makes sense and is really cool, thanks for sharing.
I don’t know how bad this is in other (non-Lutheran) countries because I’ve never worked in any of them so I can only base this on what people from those countries say, but it does seem like there’s a difference. Aside from my job as an artist I’ve only ever worked menial jobs and people treating me badly based on that were very few and far between. People tend to be very respectful and polite and treat me as an authority at the job site who’s worth asking for help or knowledge. So yeah, there’s definitely a level of respect for menial jobs and their part in society with would fit in with this theory.
Its more culture than religion tbh, because you can see from the usa and netherlands that they took this work ethic and just. Run away with it
Having been raised Lutheran, I really appreciate you making this post. Lutherans are often grouped together with other Protestants, but “Protestant work ethic” seems to more accurately reflect the behaviors and beliefs of specifically Calvinists. The Lutherans I grew up around were absolutely hardworking people, but in the sense of “if there’s work to be done, then the work needs doing; when the work *is* done, enjoy yourself.” It was an environment that encouraged doing as much as you can, but without (much) pressure to do more than that. Asking for help was normal, and giving that help was VERY normal (even when it’s cold and wet and annoying as hell). I don’t regret leaving behind christianity, but I often miss the communities I was involved with. The Lutheran approach to community work that I grew up with is one of the things I miss most.
First of all, notice how Scandinavian culture “gets” vocation. The woman whom thehmn says that he talked with gives about as good an explanation of vocation as I’ve come across: “a divine act of service to the neighbor, rather than a means to earn salvation. It elevates ordinary work to a sacred status, encouraging diligence, stewardship, and community focus as ways to love others and express faith.” We also see the correct deduction made by moriaddty that with this view of work, no one should look down on anyone else’s labor as “lesser.”
Here is a key difference between the Lutheran view and the Reformed view: For Lutherans, vocation is about love and service to the neighbor. For the Reformed, vocation is about the individual’s performance.
Another difference, not mentioned here: For Lutherans, God works through human beings in their vocations as a means of providentially caring for His creatures. The Reformed, by contrast, believe God works immediately, rather than through physical means, such as sacraments and vocation. Also, another difference that is alluded to here is that whereas the Reformed just see vocation as “your job,” Lutheran see vocation as much more than that, embracing all of our relationships in the family, the church, and the society. Hence, that “Lutheran approach to community” that theultimatepisces misses so much.
I was struck by the Scandinavian application of vocation in the workplace. It shows up, these folks are saying, in the way employers treat their employees. This is because being an employer is also a vocation, with employees being the neighbor who is to be loved and served.
I didn’t realize that it is illegal in Scandinavian countries for employers to distrust their employees by, for example, making them submit to drug tests. You can only do that, I suppose, when the employees also have a strong sense of vocation.
Notice too how attractive and compelling the Lutheran doctrine of vocation (the Lutheran doctrine, not the Calvinist version) is to secularists. I have long said that highlighting vocation can be a powerful way to draw in people who are fixated on their work but who find no meaning in it.
Sadly, these folks have apparently drifted away from Lutheranism and from Christianity altogether–except for the woman who told thehmn about vocation to, who sounds like a Lutheran Christian. You can’t really have it–and the culture can’t really have it for long–without justification by faith, the means of grace, love of God, and love of neighbor.
Photo: Copenhagen Rush Hour by Mikael Colville-Andersen via Flickr, CC BY-NC 2.0
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In