An All-Star game that meant something

An All-Star game that meant something July 17, 2008

I actually went to an All-Star game once, that 2002 game in Milwaukee that ended after 11 innings in the infamous tie. I remember how frustrating that was. This time, though, there would be no tie allowed, and the game went on for 15 innings. (No, even I did not stay up for it all.) All the pitchers were blown, and two outfielders were going to have to throw in the next inning, were it not for the AL pushing home a run to win the thing 4-3. Was that a mistake to risk so many good pitchers in a meaningless game? But it was not meaningless. The winning league gets home field advantage in the World Series, and the contenders–such as the Cubs–have a lopsidedly good record at home so those players wanted it bad. See Michael Wilbon’s analysis of the various subtexts of the game, including an unusual lavish praise for commissioner Bud Selig: No Mere Exhibition, but a Show.

"What IS coming, do you think?Well, some bad things are nearly guaranteed to happen because ..."

LCMS Members’ Commitment to the Means ..."
"It explains the stupidity, yes."

DISCUSSION: Muggeridge on Suffering
"Re your first paragraph, here in the United States WE don't consider ourselves Marxist places ..."

LCMS Members’ Commitment to the Means ..."
"Iran and Nigeria can hardly be considered Marxist places and they feature the same trends. ..."

LCMS Members’ Commitment to the Means ..."

Browse Our Archives