
But the daily narrative orchestrated by the media needs someone to talk to, interview, listen. It needs a symbol that signifies the ultimate reality. The problem is that the sign, in the media frenzy, then becomes the ultimate reality, and we spend more time talking about what the Pope says in high altitude of what the Almighty says in the highest.
I remember John Paul II, a Mass organized in order to have a strong media impact, with violins and flutes to accompany the steps of the tired Pope, sugary melodies that made the great Pontiff the star in an advertisement rather than the Vicar of Christ.
Does the media do a good service to the Church? I think that the Church suffers media attention, the churchmen (with some exceptions not always to be praised) act in a communication system that has parameters different from the those of contemporary communication. But without the media the Church would become one voice among many. The media needs the Church which supplies lots of material to offer to the general public, but especially the Church needs the media to make an impact, even if the price they pay can sometimes be very expensive.