Remembering Amora Bain Carson and the Role of Blaine Milam
Amora Bain Carson. She was only 13 months old when Blaine Milam murdered her. Her death was sudden, violent and unimaginable. A life so small and so full of potential was stolen before it had a chance to bloom. We cannot let her name fade. We must speak it. We must remember her.
Why Executing Blaine Milam Is Not Justice
Honoring Amora does not mean that killing Blaine Milam will bring justice. It will not. Blaine was barely an adult…18 years old…when this tragedy occurred. He is intellectually disabled…and was still developing and deeply vulnerable. Toxic religion had poisoned his mind. The murder itself was framed as an “exorcism”…a horrifying ritual in which a child’s death was twisted into a spiritual battle. In such spaces of lunacy… Fear becomes sacred. Violence becomes holy. Killing becomes salvation. Executing him now would only repeat this insane cycle of delusion that first claimed Amora’s life.
How Society Failed Blaine Milam
Blaine Milam is responsible for his actions. There is no escaping it. But before placing all the blame on him…we must recognize a harsher truth…society failed him first. He was abandoned…left without care, guidance or protection (which also created space for drug use to enter into his life). Then, the world fed him the worst kind of religion. His youth, intellectual disability and the toxic beliefs he absorbed collided in the most tragic way imaginable. We cannot separate the crime from the context in which it occurred…nor ignore our own role in shaping it.
Intellectual Disability
Blaine Milam is intellectually disabled. This is not a minor detail. It is central to understanding him, his actions and the question of justice. Intellectual disability affects reasoning, impulse control and the ability to understand consequences. It makes abstract concepts like morality, legality and the permanence of death difficult to grasp. Blaine did not commit his crime as a fully rational adult might. He acted as a vulnerable impressionable young man whose mind was shaped and distorted by fear, manipulation and toxic religious beliefs.
The law recognizes that individuals with intellectual disabilities cannot be held to the same standard as those who are fully competent. Courts across the country have repeatedly affirmed that executing someone with intellectual disabilities is cruel, inhumane and violates constitutional protections. It is not a question of excusing behavior. It is a question of recognizing that the moral and legal responsibility of someone like Blaine Milam is different. He is less culpable precisely because his capacity to fully understand right and wrong and the consequences of his actions is impaired.
Blaine’s disability amplified his vulnerability to manipulation, distorted spiritual authority and fear-driven decisions. Ignoring his disability is not just a legal error. It is a moral one. It says we are willing to punish a person without considering the factors that shaped him, the failures that led to the tragedy and the humanity that still exists within him.
Executing Blaine Milam while also acknowledging his intellectual disability would double down on cruelty. It would punish a mind never fully equipped to navigate the choices it faced. Justice, morality and decency require that we respond thoughtfully…not with execution…but with reflection, accountability and humane restraint.
Legal Stays
In 2021, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals stayed Blaine Milam’s execution. This was not an act of mercy. It was a recognition of the law, science and human decency. Experts and organizations including The Arc of the United States, The Arc of Texas, Disability Rights Texas and the AAIDD all testified that Blaine’s case required careful clinical consideration. They made it clear…the law must follow established clinical standards, not stereotypes or arbitrary definitions of impairment.
Yet despite these clear expert opinions, the courts have refused to act decisively since. The State insists Blaine Milam is “impaired but not impaired enough”…as if there is some cruel measurement stick for intellectual disability that justifies execution. This reasoning is both legally and morally indefensible. It ignores decades of constitutional precedent establishing that executing individuals with intellectual disabilities is unconstitutional. It dismisses the clinical consensus that Blaine’s cognitive limitations significantly reduce his culpability.
The experts are unanimous. Blaine Milam is vulnerable, impaired and profoundly influenced by his environment. His intellectual disability is not a technicality. It is central to whether he can be fairly held accountable in the same way as a competent adult. The failure of the courts to honor this expert guidance is not just a legal oversight. It is a moral failure, an abdication of responsibility and a signal that convenience, punishment and public optics are placed above justice, fairness and human dignity.
Every stay, appeal and expert report is a reminder that law and morality should intersect. They should protect the most vulnerable, not abandon them to a system eager to execute without understanding. Ignoring these interventions is not just a violation of Blaine’s rights. It is a betrayal of the principles we claim to hold dear…that justice should be rational, humane and measured, not cruel, arbitrary and vengeful.
The Hypocrisy Surrounding Blaine Milam
Here is a further moral outrage we cannot ignore. Robert Roberson‘s case has dominated headlines. Public figures, advocacy organizations and media outlets have rallied around him…eager to cast him as the perfect victim of an imperfect system. To be fair, Roberson’s claims are very compelling and he very well could be innocent. But…that doesn’t excuse the fact that Blaine Milam has been largely abandoned. Both cases involve the death of a small child. Both raise significant questions of law. Both demand moral attention. Yet the abolition industrial complex has chosen which story is worthy of outrage…which human is worthy of saving. That choice reveals something deeply hypocritical about the work of those who say their purpose is to save.
Blaine Milam’s guilt is not in question. He did this. He must face responsibility. But the question before us now is whether execution is the answer. The law, morality and public conscience are failing him. His intellectual disability, youth and the toxic religion that shaped his actions are ignored in favor of simplistic punishment. Yet because Robert Roberson claims innocence, he has been lifted up, given attention, resources and advocacy that Blaine Milam has been systematically denied. This is hypocrisy at its rawest. We claim to fight for justice, yet our outrage is selective.
With regard to Blaine Milan and Robert Roberson, to cheer for one and abandon the other is to endorse injustice while pretending to oppose it.
Blaine Milam matters. He is guilty, but his guilt does not erase his humanity or the failures of the society that produced him. Ignoring him because his case is complicated, inconvenient or uncomfortable is not justice. It is cruelty. True justice requires confronting both the crimes and the systemic failures that shape them…without hypocrisy, selective outrage or continued cycles of violence.
The Irony of Executing Blaine Milam
The bitter irony is unbearable. Blaine Milam killed Amora under the delusion that violence could cast out evil. Now the State plans to kill Blaine Milam under the same delusion, that execution will cleanse, that death will bring justice and that society can somehow correct tragedy by repeating it. Both are lies. Both are violence cloaked in righteousness.
Executing Blaine Milam does not cleanse anything. It does not make Amora’s death meaningful. It does not comfort a grieving family in any authentic way. It only repeats the pattern of fear, misbelief and brutality that led to her murder. A system that claims to uphold justice using methods that mimic the original crime risks turning itself into the same kind of agent of violence it claims to oppose.
Execution in Blaine’s case is not a corrective act. It is a symbolic echo of the same harm…a ritual of vengeance that ignores reason, mercy and the truth of human frailty. The irony is not just bitter. It is morally corrosive, poisoning the very notion of justice we claim to defend. It shows that vengeance can masquerade as law, cruelty as righteousness and spectacle as morality.
What Executing Blaine Milam Would Mean
Killing Blaine Milam will not bring back Amora. Execution does not rewrite the past. It doubles down on its mistakes. By killing Blaine, society participates in the same cycle of violence that destroyed Amora’s life, affirming fear and cruelty over care and understanding.
It would signal that vengeance is the ultimate measure of justice…that intellectual disability, youth and manipulation are irrelevant and that systemic failures can be punished by taking the life of a vulnerable man. This is not justice. It is moral abdication. It is complicity.
A Call for Justice and Humanity
This is cruelty masquerading as justice. The system made Blaine Milam who he was. Society abandoned him. Toxic religion poisoned him. Intellectual disability shaped his choices. To kill him now is to punish a man already a victim of forces far larger than himself.
To honor Amora truly, we must refuse to replicate her loss in the life of another. We must distinguish accountability from vengeance, responsibility from cruelty and justice from ritualized punishment. Justice is not served by death. It is served by facing truth, understanding harm and taking steps that protect humanity rather than destroy it.
The Moral Imperative of Protecting Blaine Milam
Surely, justice is more than killing. Morality is supposed to be more than vengeance. Decency demands we confront the full truth. We fed Blaine Milam toxic religion. We failed him. Now we are poised to kill him for it. That is not justice. That is hypocrisy. That is cruelty.
Stopping the execution is not weakness. It is moral clarity. It recognizes human complexity. It affirms life even in the guilty. It shows that justice is measured by more than revenge. It proves we are capable of mercy, reflection and moral courage. We cannot honor Amora’s life by perpetuating the same cycle of violence that took her. We cannot claim justice while selectively condemning one human being and elevating another based on convenience or narrative appeal.
No matter what anybody says. Blaine Milam matters. As long as we ignore this inconvenient fact for better narratives, we will be no different than the evil that we claim to be fighting.
*sign the petition! https://actionnetwork.org/petitions/stop-the-execution-of-blaine-milam-in-texas
*If you would like to support the Execution Intervention Project (the organization that financially supports Dr. Hood’s work), click here.
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In