2015-02-18T14:36:21-05:00

IMG_0965
I have been forced to photograph myself as a demonstration of my solidarity with Ashtaggers.

I know these people who don’t love ashtags.  People like Monique Ocampo, who is even giving up selfies for Lent.  I get it, but I am not these people.  Five reasons, six for the intrepid, and the first one will shock you:

Reason #1: I like people.

I particularly like the people I’m friends with on social media.  So I like to see photos of them.  It makes me happy to be able to see you with your cat, or your birthday cake, or your brand new, freshly-repentant ashes.  It’s like getting Christmas cards all year round, only without the thorny problem of where to store them all.

Reasons #2 – 5: Death, Judgement, Heaven, and Hell.

Take, for instance, the Dies Irae, which was the chant during the distribution of ashes at the Mass I attended today:

Day of wrath and doom impending,
David’s word with Sibyl’s blending!
Heaven and earth in ashes ending!

O what fear man’s bosom rendeth
When from heaven the Judge descendeth,
On whose sentence all dependeth!

Wondrous sound the trumpet flingeth,
Through earth’s sepulchers it ringeth,
All before the throne it bringeth.

Death is struck, and nature quaking,
All creation is awaking,
To its judge an answer making.

Lo! the book exactly worded,
Wherein all hath been recorded;
Thence shall judgment be awarded.

When the Judge His seat attaineth,
And each hidden deed arraigneth,
Nothing unavenged remaineth.

What shall I, frail man, be pleading?
Who for me be interceding,
When the just are mercy needing?

King of majesty tremendous,
Who dost free salvation send us,
Fount of pity, then befriend us!

Think, kind Jesu, my salvation
Caused Thy wondrous Incarnation;
Leave me not to reprobation.

Faint and weary Thou hast sought me,
On the Cross of suffering bought me;
Shall such grace be vainly brought me?

Righteous Judge! for sin’s pollution
Grant Thy gift of absolution,
Ere that day of retribution.

Guilty, now I pour my moaning,
All my shame with anguish owning;
Spare, O God, Thy suppliant groaning!

Through the sinful woman shriven,
Through the dying thief forgiven,
Thou to me a hope hast given.

Worthless are my prayers and sighing,
Yet, good Lord, in grace complying,
Rescue me from fires undying.

With Thy favored sheep O place me,
Nor among the goats abase me,
But to Thy right hand upraise me.

While the wicked are confounded,
Doomed to flames of woe unbounded,
Call me with Thy Saints surrounded.

Low I kneel, with heart submission,
Crushed to ashes in contrition;
Help me in my last condition!

Ah! that day of tears and morning!
From the dust of earth returning,
Man for judgment must prepare him;

Spare, O God, in mercy spare him!
Lord all-pitying, Jesu Blest,
Grant them Thine eternal rest. Amen.

English translation by William Josiah Irons (1848), via EWTN.  I know! I made you skim over the whole thing! Here it is in Latin:

I like ashtags the same way I have to constantly tell myself not to stare at everyone going up to receive Holy Communion, even though the sight of that, too, makes me happy.  It makes me happy to see people making a stab at repentance, even if they’re doing it terribly imperfectly and for all the wrong reasons.  It’s still more than nothing.

It’s so much more than nothing that I think Satan would delight to see everyone get all embarrassed and too-holy-for-public-viewing and not let anyone know that we have some vague awareness of how wretchedly miserable we are and how desperately we need a Savior.

Reason #6: Father told us to*.  This is a bonus reason you get to read if you stuck it out this far.  At Mass today Father warned us, repeatedly, not to go quick wipe our ashes off.  People are desperate for Christian witness.  Let them see for one day that yeah, as much as you stink at it, you’re in.  There’s more to you than your office face.

And to back up action with words, he wet the ashes so that we’d get some seriously-sticking big black crosses to wear at lunch not-lunch.

 

 

*Father didn’t actually use the words as much as you stink at it.  And I don’t think he specifically mentioned social media, maybe because it was the downtown lunch Mass, and it wouldn’t really do to tell people to go back to work and quick post their photos on Facebook. Or maybe because he doesn’t know what ashtagging is, or maybe because he’s with Monique on this one

Actually I was kind of daydreaming during bits of the homily, and also paying too much attention to the excessively cute baby and preschooler in the pew in front of me, so I was looking all happy and joyful instead of repentant like a good girl.  But he definitely said the part about not wiping off.  He probably said it more than twice, but I heard it twice, for sure.

 

 

 

2015-02-18T10:21:08-05:00

My young daughter, whose cuteness makes her look even younger, sat on the stool at the jewelry store, stone still, waiting for the two gloved salesladies to punch holes through her earlobes on the count of three.  Stoic child, but if you can read her you knew she was nervous.  This was something she wanted, very much wanted.  She knew it would hurt, because we all reminded her of that fact, repeatedly.  She also knew two other things: Her older sister had done it and she was just fine now, and that if you want real earrings, this is the only way to get them.

We are not, as a culture, so weak as we claim. We’re willing to suffer all kinds of penance in order to be beautiful, famous, or wealthy.  Ask me to sit still for half an hour in prayer, and I’ll explain to you that I’m really no good at that.  Ask me to sit still for hours on a plane in order to get to vacation, and I’ll remind you that it’s not that big of a deal, you can do anything for a while, the temporary inconvenience is worth it.

If you want to know what you love, look at what you are willing to suffer for.

The suffering we accept willingly is the most honest of measure of who we are and what we are about.

Happy Lent!

File:Maslenitsa kustodiev.jpg

Artwork: Boris Kustodiev [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons. Click through to read the explanation, including the link to what Maslenitsa is. Here’s the direct link to the image file, so you can appreciate the tremendous detail.

 

Related:

1. Simcha Fisher covers the tour of Lenten penitential options here.  Most important point:

Unless you’re a hermit, your decision will affect other people. The rule of thumb is that you get to choose your suffering. Not everyone else’s.

2. If you can only have one devotional for Lent for your entire household, you want Sarah Reinhard’s Welcome Risen Jesus.  Don’t mind the cute cover art.  It’s packed solid and won’t disappoint.  Why yes, when my husband announced late into Mardi Gras that he still didn’t know what he was doing for Lent, I put her booklet in his hand.  He flipped through and said, “Wow.  There’s a lot of good stuff in here.”  Because yeah, when it comes down to it, deep inside you stay eight years old for most of your life.

2015-02-13T16:28:23-05:00

Fr. Longenecker writes here on why Catholics can’t have good music, and he makes a decent historical argument:

Suddenly we were flooded with new hymns–most of which had banal lyrics, crappy folk music and trite sentiment. The Catholics didn’t sing the old hymns because they didn’t know them. In the meantime they were having lots of awful new songs shoved down their throat and they (quite rightly) didn’t bother singing them because they knew deep down that they were either unsingable or execrable.

. . . Furthermore. I have asked Catholic priests if they ever received any training at seminary in the tradition of hymnology, sacred music, chant or the proper way to choose hymns for liturgy. The answer has almost always been a resounding “No.”

But let’s be clear: That explains why we had bad music last year, last decade, last late-millennium.  What explains why we have bad music today?  We don’t care.

 

I don’t me we the people sitting in the pews because we are required by canon law to attend Mass on Sundays, so Sunday we will be there.  I mean we the people who own the responsibility for the liturgy, and really just don’t give a crap if the music is deplorable.

That’s why.

Not everybody everywhere can have high church and amazing complex world-class choral compositions.  So be it.  Everybody everywhere can have simple, decent music at Mass.  That’s the human condition: People sing.  People are made, by God, to sing, the Bible tells us so.  Original sin do what it will, an awful lot of people are capable of singing well enough.

Singing bad songs, or singing good songs badly, is not the only choice.

If there is bad music at your parish, and it goes on for more than six months, it is because someone has made the decision for there to be bad music.

That is why.

We can’t have nice things if we refuse to have nice things.

 

File:Solar flare (TRACE).gif
This is my brain thinking about Church music.

Photo: Solar Flare, by NASA [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

2015-02-10T15:28:03-05:00

(Quick update to remind the catechists: This is a blog for adults, not kids. Patheos is not a site for children.  If you want to share this particular post with your class, just print it out and read aloud.  For goodness sake don’t send a twelve-year-old here.  But grown-up to grown-up?  Share away.)

***

My son and I were talking about click-bait.  If only the Catholic faith were presented more like internet news.  We brainstormed a few possibilities, as gleaned from his confirmation class:

Ascension Press? YDisciple? Are you listening?  Yeah, I didn’t think so either.

File:British - Piety - Google Art Project.jpg

Artwork: Check Out This Amazing Oil Painting from 17th Century England – You’ll Never Believe What it Was Painted On.  (Public Domain, courtesy of Wikimedia.)

2015-01-26T13:16:56-05:00

I periodically give the friends and relatives a health update, which I don’t usually publish here.  But thermostat settings, everyone wants to talk about that, right?  

So everything is holding steady, which is good.  Miracle drug still doing its miracle thing.  I got hold of a fitness tracker this winter and have started watching the daily exertion count, which makes it much easier to manage my activity level, but also maybe a little more depressing (she said buoyantly).  Basically the pace of six days on, one day off works pretty well, as long as the six days are “average”.   I’m getting trained to take a second rest day preemptively if I know I can’t afford to bonk later in the week.

What doesn’t work: Continuing with a few extra average days, because you feel fine and anyway there are important things happening . . . talk about high-interest loans.  Try to skip one rest day, and find your brain slowly draining away during the last couple “just one more normal day” days, and then your body is utterly laid out, as if you had the flu only you did not have the flu, for five days.  Try to gain one day, lose five, and also alienate a few folks by your lousy social skills during the pre-collapse decline. Yeah, that was a neat experiment.

So that trained me to be aggressive about managing rest, and overall it was a beneficial experience because without the certainty that rest is a non-negotiable, it would be much harder to set the boundaries.  Also, I discovered all these interesting BBC miniseries, so it worked out.  Essentially I can tell how sick I am by how interested I am in television.  Healthy = Zero Interest.  Medium = I’d rather be writing.  Desperate = Is There a Law that Brendan Coyle has to be in Every British Period Drama Ever Made Since 1991?

The surreal part of all this is that I find myself thinking, about myself, Well, um you don’t look sick to me.  That’s a good thing (yay modern medicine), because pallor and gasping and feeling perpetually buzzed is overrated. The new normal is operating like a completely normal person, and without any particular difficulty, other than that normal happens to be at the limit of my physical capacity.

But that at-the-limit situation doesn’t mean what I’d expect: It’s no problem at all at any given moment to quick sprint across the yard, or take a long walk, or haul boxes of stuff in and out of the truck, and so everything seems completely not-sick. The hitch is in the number of days I can pull it off for, before I find myself suddenly struck by the Useless Fairy because I used up my minutes.

The other confusing thing is that if I’m on an even keel, things that other people find difficult, like spitting out massive quantities of punditry, are easy.  Effortless.  Which makes it seem like I’m a person of leisure and boundless productivity, when what I’m actually doing is preventing myself from going absolutely mad while I ration the physical exertion like an exercise miser.

I think that’s what it is: Being actively sick was like being exertion-destitute.  Now I’m upgraded to the exertion counterpart of living on a very frugal budget: It isn’t that you can’t live on it, and have nice things and go places and all that; it’s that in order to make normal life happen without careening from crisis to crisis, you have to spend your limited resources very carefully.

***

So. The thermostat story: We’re the kind of people who don’t turn up the heat in the winter.  Normal winter thermostat settting was low sixties during the day, down to 55 at night (if it got so cold indoors, which is only in the depth of winter), and with a little blip up to 65 in the morning during shower-time.  Also we’d push it up over 65 if guests came over, because people don’t always dress for winter during winter.  We have a small wood stove in the living room that lets us do the cozy-around-the-fire thing in the evening if we want to as well.

Seemed to us like a fairly moderate regime, far less rigorous than the norm throughout the bulk of human history, but perfectly manageable even living in one of these societies where you’re expected to engage in full-immersion bathing every single day of the year, no matter how cold it is outside, thank goodness for hot water heaters.  (I don’t mind a hot shower nor the benefits of obsessive hygiene, this works out for me, product of my time as I am.)

But what happened was that as soon as the house got cold, I completely turned into a slug.  The new-normal wasn’t sustainable.  I theorized after a little research that since I was already living at the limits of my endurance (which sounds more dramatic than it is, but still, is the case), the extra load of trying to keep the body warm was pushing me over the edge.  I set the thermostat to “hold temp” at 65 night and day, and sure enough the body reverted to its normal cycle of productivity.

So now when I see people talk about thermostat settings, I have a whole new layer of curmudgeonly thoughts that I don’t share.  To summarize: You don’t need to turn the heat up, unless you do.

File:AnnanStaff2.jpg

Image by Haloeffect, edit by PiccoloNamek [GFDL or CC-BY-SA-3.0], via Wikimedia Commons

2016-10-26T12:30:26-05:00

File:Stamp of Kyrgyzstan 147-151.jpg

In 1988 I moved to a small town in South Carolina, not far from where my paternal grandfather had grown up. In enrolling me at the local high school, among other paperwork my parents had to indicate whether they did or did not permit the principal to administer corporal punishment. Also, in those days they kept records of the racial balance in every classroom.

On the day of the census in 1990, my homeroom teacher faced an awkward situation: The form called for a tally of the number of white students and the number of black students. In what category, we asked her, would she put the one student who could not, by any reckoning of the universally-understood meaning of those categories, be counted as one or the other?

She said she’d figure something out.

Immigration has since radically changed the face of the South, but we all still know exactly what we mean by black or white. Everyone else who lives here gets described by their ethnic origin, more or less. But blackness and whiteness, cultural constructs though they are, continue to be the way we describe the people who fit into our original two categories.

[Observe though, that in our diocese, for example, we have black priests and African priests, white priests and polish priests. Our cultural construct is very much tied to our local culture.]

Because we’re talking about racism, and because the thing I know about is white people, we’ll stick with the words that southerners use. Allow me to reassure the reader: Though the history behind the cultural construct is sordid in the extreme, the words black and white, as used in the language by southerners today, are in no way inherently derogatory. The words can be used in an insulting manner, but the words themselves are not insults.

***

So I was down in St. Matthew’s for a volleyball tournament. Calhoun County is part of SC’s Corridor of Shame, which means that the academics are dismal and the athletic facilities are merely adequate; there is no monstrous brick archworks surrounding the football stadium, like you find at the rich schools.

The school sits at the very edge of town; on the drive in we saw only frost-covered fields, and lines of bare trees against the pink-purple dawn. Later, at a break before the semifinals, I lay outside under an enormous sky, the sun warming the west-facing brick walls of the school, and watched the clouds go over. Every now and then the voice of a farmer carried over from the crossroads where he had parked his truck.

It’s beautiful country. You see why people stay. But if you mean to make any kind of living after graduation, you’ll probably have to leave.

 ***

Bleachers are the bane of my existence. Back inside the gym, the first game of the semi-finals was getting started. I found a spot down low in the stands where I could stretch out and lean against my backpack and not be completely uncomfortable. I was the only one in that section; my daughter was sitting higher-up with her teammates, waiting to be called to warm up for their game.

A young man (black, as it happened) came and sat on a chair by the wall near where I was sitting. He had the school logo on his jacket, and I guessed he was there helping with the tournament in some way. A little while later another young man (also black, coincidence) showed up, dressed the same way – black warm-ups with the school logo in red – and took a seat near us. More of these young men started to arrive, filling out the seats in the bleachers around me. They greeted one another, subdued but not solemn. While they sat, they indulged odd snatches of conversation, barely audible.

I eventually learned that they were the basketball team. Varsity, if I’m any judge of the ages of teenage boys. They were gathering to travel to an away game.

There was something unusual about the group that I’m not supposed to notice, because I’m a middle-aged white lady: These young men, all dozen or so of them, were all that impossibly deep black-brown color that makes you think of Africa. It would have been merely very beautiful, except that I think it had a bearing on what was being said up and behind us.

***

Southern rural black culture is complex. It is influenced by the popular culture and informed by some 200 years of comings and goings, as is the wider American black culture. What makes the culture in a place like St. Matthews distinct, though, is that it is also informed by some 200 years of staying put. Sitting there among the boys on the team, you could sense that complexity but could never hope to unravel it.

Once or twice the guys ask me a question about the volleyball tournament, and I answer them. Otherwise we keep to ourselves. They are unconvinced when I try to persuade them to cheer for my daughter’s team, if they should still be around when her game starts. Boys can be so shy that way.

***

The popular media have plenty to say about black teenagers with guns, but you don’t hear stories like the one that happened in the Calhoun County High School gymnasium that night.

One of the boys sitting against the wall of the gym leans over to his friend next to him and shows him a picture. Eager. Happy. I can’t see it from where I’m sitting. I’m the closet person to them. His friend says, “Is that a real gun?”

I know right away what cultural divide I’m looking at between those two boys. The south is complex.

“Yes, it’s real,” the first boy assures him. And then he explains, several times because his friend is just not getting it, “What I really want is a 12-gauge pump action.” He stands up and gestures the pump-action on the shotgun he can’t quite afford.

“You hunt?” I ask him.

“Yes ma’am.”

If there were a Redneck GRE, we would take the data sets Economy and Geography of Calhoun County, and the fact Wants a 12-Gauge, and be able to answer without difficulty the question that I ask next. I ask it anyway, because I’m an idiot* with a compulsion for small talk. “What do you hunt?”

“Deer.”

I want to see the picture of the gun, curiosity, but I realize it will only demonstrate my utter inability to make intelligent conversation on the subject of inexpensive hunting rifles.  Small talk never was my strong suit.

We go back to watching the game. I answer a few more questions about the format of the tournament and how the scoring works.

 ***

18-year-old boys with guns, some of them black, are the people who liberated Europe from the Nazis. They are not children. They are young men, strong, capable, passionate and at times heroic. If we infantalize such men, we don’t therefore keep them perpetually eight years old; we get, instead, toddlers in grown-up bodies. If you’ve ever spent the afternoon with an unhappy toddler, you know that adding two-hundred pounds to the equation is not a winning prospect.

The coach arrives, 60-something, massive, stern. Black as his team. He greets the them each in that same low tone they use with each other. You sense that he is fully aware of his responsibility to his boys, and to their parents. The players are disciplined. Manly, if boyish about the edges. The coach checks on a few details in the office, then the team rises on some silent order and leaves to catch their bus, no dragging, no delays. The boy who was sitting behind me wishes my daughter’s team good luck, and I wish him likewise. And then I’m alone again in the stands.

 

Afterwards, my daughter tells me about a conversation that took place while I was sitting there among the guys. She has a teammate who has no filter, a rambunctious child who says whatever she’s thinking. We’ll call her Chatty. They have another teammate whom we’ll call Trusty, because she’s on the short list of people my daughter will let hold her phone.

Chatty, scandalized: Your mom is sitting down there talking with the basketball players.

My daughter: Um. Yeah?

Chatty: But they’re black.

Daughter: So?

Chatty: They’re black basketball players.

Trusty: I’m black. And I played basketball. And you talk to me. She can talk to whoever she wants.

 That more or less ended it. Like I said, no filter.

 ***

The thing about that conversation is that my daughter’s teammate, who couldn’t turn off her brain-mouth connection if you installed a switch on the side of her face, was just saying what she’d learned to think.

Since I spend time around unsupervised white people, I get to hear racist blather. And thus, when President and Mrs. Obama were all in the news talking about acts of perceived racism, I knew they were not entirely wrong.

It’s an error and an injustice to accuse all white people of racism. But it would be a lie to say that in 2015 American racism is a thing of the past. It isn’t.

I’d like to talk about some of the nuances of what that means today.

***

Because racism is real, it breeds hypersensitivity. Non-racist white people worry that this or that innocent action will be mistakenly perceived as racist. Black people who have experienced genuine racism elsewhere may erroneously attribute to racism an action that had some other explanation.

There exists also a kind of background-racism, thoughtless and unintended, in which our paradigms are informed by stereotypes. Thus when President Obama, dressed in suit or tuxedo, is confused for the valet or the waiter, it would be a mistake to assume the person who mistook him necessarily believed, “It’s impossible for a black person to be a politician or businessman, he must be service-staff.”

Rather, there’s an underlying set of race-based generalizations that make one more quickly jump to the conclusion that the black guy in the tux is the waiter, rather than looking for more subtle cues as to the man’s position. (GK Chesterton wrote a Father Brown mystery that hinged on just such ambiguity.)

It’s racism, but different than the sort that burns crosses in front of black churches, and different from the sort that says white ladies don’t talk to black basketball players. Unlike those latter two, at times the mistake might have nothing to do with racism at all.

So let’s talk about the basketball players.

***

Most of the racist white people I know would recoil in horror at lynching or arson. They bear no ill wishes towards black people as a class, they just happen to disdain the bulk of them. What these white folk are, in fact, are elitists. Black people whom they know, and whom they discover to be intelligent, fiscally responsible, polite, well-spoken, accomplished, tasteful – all per whatever standard the beholder decides to apply – they aren’t the problem. It’s those other black people.

It’s a muddled up discouragement at certain real social problems, combined with bad upbringing and a general need to feel superior to somebody.

Indeed, the modern American white racist is just applying a bungled version of our national moral system, in which right consists of what I do, and wrong consists of things demonstrably worse than what I do. Sin is the other side of the line between me and my inferiors. Sure I do this, but that guy over there does it much much worse.

For all we claim to be egalitarian, Americans are consummate snobs. Be assured, the white folk I know who spew racist nonsense, and others who take their elitism in more sophisticated forms, would be just as put off if I sat with a group of white people who in some obvious way failed to meet spec.

***

The funny thing about this kind of racism, this elitism, is that I have seen it cured. I have seen a man fall in love with a woman who, to all outward appearances, was the wrong color and tasteless into the bargain. The kind of woman who would have been the butt of racist jokes. But somehow he meets her in just the right way, so that he gets to know her – kind, intelligent, generous, witty, resourceful, hardworking, a treasured companion. And suddenly a whole world opens up to him. Her people become his people, and he’s proud to be part of it.

This was always the cure, and it still is. To the extent that Americans are stuck in our snobbery, it is only that we haven’t yet sufficiently fallen in love.

 

*UPDATE: Reader Theodore Seeber observes that a better guess would have been that he hunts birds.  We thus garner additional proof of who in my household brings home the venison, and who just makes the stroganoff.

Artwork: Postage Stamp, Kyrgyzstan (http://www.stamp.elcat.kg/english/98.html) [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons 

2015-01-13T22:16:04-05:00

Earlier, I answered Melanie Bettinelli’s post on the challenge of communal feast day observances with a calendar: Here’s what we do to observe the liturgical year at our house.  If you read through my litany, you’ll see that we enjoy a combination of private celebrations, parish-centered celebrations, and many observances involving a small community of Catholic (and other) friends.  We are, in all, quite blessed.  I didn’t answer her deeper question, which is, “How do we get there?”

She writes:

 It’s just I live in a parish where I have no idea if anyone else does this stuff or not. We go to mass together and then… Go home and do our own thing. I feel atomized and disconnected. . . . Virtual fellowship isn’t the same as a shared meal and the kids playing together while the adults chat.

I do think there is an argument to be made that we have to start with creating these traditions at home before we can have them in our parishes. But I guess I’ve not seen many people talking about how to take that next step, how to get from the reinvented domestic church to the reinvented parish.

. . . Is it fair to assume that if you get a critical mass of intentional families the communal celebrations will follow?  Or, conversely, if you create the parish celebrations, will they help families to become more intentional?

I’m going to respond by first explaining how we got to where we are, enjoying a real-life community of Catholic disciples who get together to observe the feasts.  Then I’ll make some comments on the merits of parish versus smaller-community observances.

How We Became the Party People

One year my husband and I decided we wanted to go Christmas caroling.  We set a date and sent out invitations to everyone we could think of who might agree to come.  I printed out music off the internet and compiled song books.  We cooked a lot of food.  We told people to bring flashlights.

Enough people came. We went around the neighborhood ringing on doorbells and singing songs.  Some of our friends hated it and never came back, some of them loved it and turned out again the following year.  In the time since then, some years we’ve hosted a party, some years we didn’t, and lately we’ve fallen in with a group of friends who will do the leg work for us, and we just turn up and sing.

But this is the way you make things happen: You decide what you are going to do, and then you invite people.  Some people will come, and some people won’t.  Some people will hate it, and some people won’t. It’s not a big deal. There’s no law that every person has to like every party.

How We Found Friends Who Will Host Parties for Us

The best thing is when you can get someone else to do most of the work.  The trick is to fall in with the right crowd.  In our case, a lot of our feast day observances happen in common with some Catholic homeschoolers we know.  But it could be anyone: The Legion of Mary, St. Vincent de Paul, the choir people, the youth group . . . You never know where the hidden pious-partying talent lies.  So you can save yourself a lot of trouble by keeping your ear to the ground and figuring out who’s already celebrating the way you want to celebrate, and then wrangling an invitation for yourself.

(Hint: You can finagle invitations by signing yourself up as an auxillary member, part-time volunteer, or logistical assistant.  I mean, sure, you can’t sing.  But the choir has the best parties.  So you volunteer to help sort sheet music, and happen to always have good homemade baked goods on hand, and voila!, invitation secured.  Lemon bars will get you everywhere.)

There are people, of course, who will think up reasons not to have you in their group. These are not the people with whom you want to spend your holidays.

How to Find Holiday Disciple Friends

You can also create your own set of holiday friends by forming a discipleship group.  Pick a book like Forming Intentional Disciples and invite some likely candidates over to discuss it.  Then see if they bite when you suggest meeting once or twice a month to chat about the faith and help each other become better Christians.  There’ll be some fall off, but keep inviting and eventually you’ll have a core group of people who want to do Catholic stuff together, because they love Jesus and love being Catholic.  Plan some parties to coincide with the feast days.  Get the lady who makes the lemon bars to bring the dessert.

All these are things you can do either within the bounds of a formally-recognized parish organization or all on your own as free-agent laypeople.  Parish-run groups are convenient if there is a known pool of people who will be drawn to your interest-group, however you define it, and who are easily reached via the modes of parish communication.  Informally-organized groups can seem scarier, because you can’t hide behind your official status: You have to walk up to people, perhaps people you barely know, and say, “We’re hosting a little event next week, and I’d love it if you could join us.”

No matter what your format, plan to extend approximately ten invitations for every acceptance. Once you have a group going, plan for about twenty-percent of your group to slip off into other pursuits each year.  You’ll have higher acceptance, but also higher annual attrition, if you serve a more migratory population.

What Roles Should Your Parish Play in Your Pious Catholic Party Culture?

It all just depends.  I think it’s reasonable for the parish to restrict itself to administering the sacraments and performing the works of mercy, doing that job well, and leaving the festivating to the freewheeling laity.  It would be normal for a typical parish to host one or two major social events a year, whether tied to a feast or sacrament, or just there for the sake of getting everyone together.  Certainly the liturgy ought to include processions and hymns and prayers as indicated for the various holy days, so that you don’t feel like a crazy person because you’re the only one in the county who knows that there’s a feast day on.

One hazard is that many parishes are not primarily populated by disciples.  What you end up with are events with good food and drink, and a bunch of upbeat music that everyone knows and loves from listening to the radio, but half the lyrics are about fornication, and people get upset if you point this out to them.  In this context, asking the parish to take a role in organizing festivities is a bad idea.

Another reality is that most parishes are very large.  Some of our favorite events, like caroling door-to-door or having the kids present saints’ lives, don’t lend themselves well to gatherings of five hundred of your favorite pew mates.  Some festal activities work well with, or even require, massive attendance; but just a many are more rewarding, or only possible, if carried out on a more intimate scale.  It’s reasonable, therefore, for the parish to determine that most of the feast days throughout the year should be celebrated by the smaller communities within the parish.

Being the Only Catholic You Know is Lonely

One time I was visiting a parish that for many years had been notoriously heterodox.  But on this unusual day, I was invited to extend my visit by joining a bible study group that was being led by parishioners I’d never met before.  I made a few inquiries and decided to try my luck, since I happened to have time on my hands, and one of the things I do is study study-groups.  After half an hour I said to myself, “So this is where all the Catholics have been hiding!”  It wasn’t that the parish was devoid of disciples, only that they mostly kept a low profile.

The reality is that if your parish isn’t disciple-intensive, it can take a lot of trial and error to find the people who are serious about following Jesus.  It takes yet more work to find the fellow disciples with whom you really hit it off, the kind of people you’d be eager to spend three hours chatting with over lukewarm macaroni and cheese.  It’s worth the work.

Even though it can be hard, it isn’t complicated.  The lovely thing about everyone trying to follow Jesus is that you don’t have to be exactly like each other.  You just have to all be intent on worshiping the same Lord.

File:Brueghel The Wine Of Saint Martins Day Private Collection Madrid.jpg
Artwork: Pieter Brueghel the Elder (1526/1530–1569), The Wine of Saint Martin’s Day [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

Follow Us!



Browse Our Archives