Is the Son of Man in Daniel 7.13 a Divine Being?

Is the Son of Man in Daniel 7.13 a Divine Being? April 24, 2017

Jesus’ favorite title he applied to himself was “the Son of Man.” The New Testament (NT) gospels relate that Jesus identified himself as “the Son of Man” on about 39 occasions, and it was only him who did so. The occasion on which Jesus most clearly identified himself as the Son of Man was when he healed a man who had been blind from birth (John 9.1-12). Jesus later asked him, “‘Do you believe in the Son of Man?’ He answered and said, ‘And who is He, Lord, that I may believe in Him?’ Jesus said to him, ‘You have both seen Him, and He is the one who is talking with you.’ And he said, ‘Lord, I believe” (vv. 35-38 NASB and throughout).

Christians have always connected Jesus’ portrayal of himself as the Son of Man with the Old Testament (OT) account of Daniel’s prophetic vision about four beasts that depict four, successive, Gentile world empires (Daniel 7.2-12). Daniel further relates concerning the end of this time period, “Behold, with the clouds of heaven One like a Son of Man was coming, and He came up to the Ancient of Days [God] and was presented before Him. And to Him was given dominion, glory and a kingdom, that all the people, nations and men of every language might serve Him” (Daniel 7.13-14).

Church fathers connected Jesus’ self-designation as the Son of Man to Daniel 7.13- 14, but they never emphasized this title since they thought it signified his humanity. But many modern Bible scholars now believe the opposite. They insist that Daniel’s Son of Man figure is divine. But many of them do not connect this figure with Jesus. So, if this “one like a son of man” figure in Dan 7.13 portrays Jesus, does mean he is divine?

Oscar Cullmann claimed that Jesus drew upon Daniel’s Son of Man figure and “that by means of this very term Jesus spoke of his divine heavenly character.” And I. Howard Marshall says Jesus’ use of Daniel’s Son of Man figure indicates both his humanity and “divine origin” because “he comes from heaven.”

So, some Christian scholars have thought Jesus preexisted and was divine because Daniel’s Son of Man is a heavenly figure and/or he will come from heaven to earth. James Dunn rightly counters, “It by no means follows that a figure in an apocalyptic vision is pre-existent simply because he appears before God in heaven.”

Normative Judaism always allowed for the belief that various human beings preexisted, yet they were not conceived as being divine. These included the ante-diluvian Enoch, the priest-king Melchizedek, the law-giver Moses, and the prophet Elijah. Believing such people preexisted was never thought to imperil Judaism’s strict monotheism.

Some Christian scholars cite Second Temple Jewish apocalyptic literature, such as the Similitudes (=1 Enoch 37-71) and perhaps 4 Ezra, to support that the Son of Man preexisted his human life (1 Enoch 48.6; 62.7; 4 Ezra 12.32; 13.3, 26), making him divine. The Similitudes do mention “the Son of Man” fourteen times, and both of these sources identify him as “the Messiah” (1 Enoch 48.10; 52.4; 4 Ezra 7.28-29; 12.32). They also seem to attribute to him preexistence (1 Enoch 48.2, 6; 62.6-7; 4 Ezra 12.32; 13.26). But these sources never identify this “Son of Man” as either divine or God. BTW, these sources should be viewed as commentaries on Daniel’s Son of Man.

Some Christian scholars interpret Daniel’s Son of Man as an individual who is “divine,” “deity,” or “god/God” because he comes “with the clouds of heaven.” For support, they cite several parallel OT texts that describe God riding on clouds or being pictured in clouds (Exodus 13.21; 20.21; Psalm 97.2; 104.3; Isaiah 19.1). These scholars claim this activity is a prerogative that belongs only to God, so that the Son of Man must God. But these scholars assume this proposition arbitrarily, thus without biblical support.

Judaism always repudiated the idea that the Messiah is God, whether he comes on clouds or not. The Talmud says if Jews ever become “deserving,” their Messiah will come to them triumphantly “with clouds of heaven;” but if not, he will come “lowly and riding upon an ass” (Sanhedrin 98a). Judaism even taught that when Moses died he ascended on a cloud to heaven. So, Jews never restricted riding on clouds to deity.

Jesus quoted from Daniel 7.13 when he predicted concerning his return, “they will see the SON OF MAN COMING ON THE CLOUDS OF THE SKY with power and great glory” (Matthew 24.30). And we read more about it, “BEHOLD, HE IS COMING WITH THE CLOUDS” (Revelation 1.7). (The NASB translation places all NT quotations of the OT in small caps. So, these small caps are a quotation from Daniel 7.13.)

Christians certainly should not think that riding on clouds signifies divinity. The Apostle Paul says of the future resurrection that believers “shall be caught up … in the clouds to meet the Lord [Jesus] in the air” (2 Thessalonians 4.17).

Daniel’s account of the Son of Man does not preclude that he could have lived an earthly life prior to his receiving in heaven an earthly kingdom, in which case he merely would have awaited the long interval. The chronological order of events of Jesus life as the Son of Man, on earth and heaven, would be as follows: (1) he is born and lives an earthly life; (2) then occurs his death, resurrection, heavenly ascension, and exaltation to God’s right hand; (3) the long time interval transpires; (4) the heavenly court passes judgment on the fourth kingdom on earth; (5) a royal coronation ceremony immediately follows in heaven, in which the Son of Man is given the kingdom and crowned as its king; (6) he then descends to earth, bringing his kingdom with him; (7) he destroys the fourth kingdom on earth and replaces it with his eternal kingdom.

Much of this is what Jesus had indeed taught in his parable of the nobleman (Luke 19.11-27), referring to himself. He said, “A certain nobleman went to a distant country to receive a kingdom for himself, and then return” (v. 12). Upon his return the nobleman announced, “these enemies of mine, who did not want me to reign over them, bring them here and slay them in my presence” (v. 27). Neither this parable nor Daniel’s account of the Son of Man requires that Jesus is divine or God.

…………….

To see a list of titles of 130+ posts (2-3 pages) that are about Jesus not being God in the Bible, with a few about God not being a Trinity, at Kermit Zarley Blog click “Chistology” in the header bar. Most are condensations of my book, The Restitution of Jesus Christ. See my website servetustheevangelical.com, which is all about this book,  with reviews, etc. Learn about my books and purchase them at kermitzarley.com. I was a Trinitarian for 22 years before reading myself out of it in the Bible.

"I agree that people should welcome modifications of the physical human condition, to the extent ..."

Many Christians Will Oppose Transhumanism
"Many Christians will also embrace Transhumanism. The Mormon Transhumanist Association was founded in 2006. And ..."

Many Christians Will Oppose Transhumanism
"RE eschatology--I think bro Wright does expect a future coming of Christ, with resurrection of ..."

Tom Wright Calls for Theologians and ..."
"Tom Wright says Jesus did not know he was God. Quite omniscient of Jesus I ..."

Tom Wright Calls for Theologians and ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment