The Doomsday Clock Just Moved

The Doomsday Clock Just Moved January 27, 2018

DoomsdayClock2In Washington D.C. Thursday, the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists announced that the Doomsday Clock was moved 30 seconds forward to 2 minutes to midnight. That is the closest it has ever been to midnight except in the year 1953, when it was 2 minutes to midnight at the height of the Cold War. This is alarming. But for people who follow world news, it’s probably not surprising.

The Doomsday Clock was created in 1947, thus two years after WWII. It was because a group of scientists were concerned about the future security of life on earth. The U.S. had dropped two atomic bombs on Japan to end the war. Those were the first atomic weapons ever detonated against a foe.

Thursday, the Bulletin’s science and security board explained their forward movement of the clock, “In 2017, world leaders failed to respond effectively to the looming threats of nuclear war and climate change making the world security situation more dangerous than it was a year ago–and as dangerous as it has been since World War II.”

One of the members of the Bulletin’s board is Lawrence M. Krause, a cosmology professor at Arizona State University, a few miles away from where I live. He explained concerning the Doomsday Clock, “People can say it’s a scam, but the point is to encourage discussion. What you’re trying to do is get people to act.”

Act how? One way is to join the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons. Beatrice Fihn is its executive director. Last year, she was awarded the Noble Peace Prize for her work on nuclear disarmament. I am for nuclear disarmament. Of course, there needs to be nuclear disarmament bi-lateral or multi-lateral agreements between nations. The nuclear disarmament movement has existed for over fifty years. But lately, it has stalled and is losing ground. That’s part of why the Doomsday Clock is now the closer to midnight than it has ever been.

 

"Absolutely cannot support such a proposal as psychological testing of potential presidential candidates. If such ..."

Should U.S. Require Psychological Testing of ..."
"The enemy of my enemy who's my friend is an enemy of my enemy who ..."

Should U.S. Require Psychological Testing of ..."
"Why limit this to presidential candidates? There are few people who get it in their ..."

Should U.S. Require Psychological Testing of ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment