“balance” in the media meant “Giving different views an airing in order to achieve the common good.” Now it means “Giving good and evil an airing in order to encourage people to call evil ‘good'”.
What if new tests for Down syndrome could one day mean no more affected babies are born? Is that cause to celebrate medical advances or reason to worry we are callously weeding out the less-than-perfect in our midst?
The fact that the question is even being asked is, itself, evidence of massive corruption. Of course we are callously weeding out the less-than-perfect in our midst! See this as *anything* other than that (let alone as a legitimate “alternative view” is simply conditioning people to accept eugenics. Period.
This is the way people *always* talk when they are laboring to justify evil.