Romney: An Inspiration to Us All

Romney: An Inspiration to Us All April 23, 2012

A reader writes:

I can’t believe the stupidity of Romney’s campaign flacks, choosing a site near a venue where the President had spoken a day or so earlier, giving the impression of Romney tagging along behind the President, nipping at his heels. Or staging this frat-level stunt itself. Gosh, Romneys’ noticed that the President’s work toward economic recovery has not been as successful as everyone would have liked it to be. Truly, Romney is a man of genius and destiny.

Americans won’t throw an incumbent President overboard because he or she seems inept, unaware, and not up to the challenges the nation faces. Realizing that your car is nearing the end of its service life doesn’t translate into running out and buying a new car. If Jimmy Carter had run only against John (“I’m looking at the Berlin Wall”) Anderson, Carter would have had a second term. Americans will vote President Obama out of office if they think he’s inept, and if they think Romney’s not. Romney can’t get elected by claiming that Obama isn’t living up to his billing and that the election is about leadership. It’s true, but it’s only two-thirds of the case. The indispensible third leg is that Romney is a leader. You don’t make that case by following President Obama around and noticing that a warehouse is empty enough to fit the offices of your entire private-equity firm, with room left over for your Cadillacs.

Ditto Romney’s whining about Obama “punishing success.” That’s also a pretty stupid move when most people think that only the rich are succeeding in the first place. It sounds as though Romney thinks the American electorate is watching The Poseidon Adventure and that we should be rooting for the private-equity and investment-banking guys, portrayed symbolically by the plucky Shelly Winters, to make it out alive. Why punish the only people with the capital and vision to succeed in our economy? It’s not like the rest of us have a flaming hope in Hell of sending our kids to good colleges, spending a week at the beach every year, and retiring before we’re 82.

There’s a funny similarity between Romney and Obama, the GOP and the Democrats. They’re both vitally interested in capital. For the GOP, this vital interest is a pie-in-the-sky fantasy about the uber rich getting richer and oh, by the way, creating ripples of prosperity that will eventually lap at the sides of middle-class rowboats (which are increasingly resembling flotsam). For Democrats it’s a ridiculous hallucination about natureless individuals making irrelevant sexual and ideological choices within spheres of state permission maintained by taxing the uber rich. Both parties care desperately about America’s capital and money interests, about what makes them happy, what makes them useful and productive, and how America can take full advantage of their wonderful ability to accumulate more and more wealth. President Obama and Mitt Romney wonder whether the money interests can afford X tax, or whether they’d be happier with Y cuts. Are the money interests too regulated? Perhaps they could be better regulated? Answer those questions and you’ve taken care of the non-rich. What’s good for the boardroom is good for everyone. And that’s the choice we have in November.

And so this Man of the People is already driven to having to try to force members of his own party to pledge to vote for him –with limited success. Way to win an election, Thing That Used to Be Conservatism.

"Free will to resist grace, available to all, and to reject good. God loves us ..."

Where Peter Is has a nice ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Tominellay

    …thinking that to save face, Romney’s campaign would rather arrange for Romney to speak to zero people in an abandoned warehouse, than have the media report him speaking to the thirteen or fourteen folks who would actually leave their homes to listen to him…all of this while Ron Paul is drawing thousands, rain or shine…

  • Edgewise

    ” Answer those questions and you’ve taken care of the non-rich….”

    Hmm… Then again–well, here might be a little something for your reader (and you? [and, perhaps, anyone else as well?]) to take into consideration:

    (Might also be helpful to take nite of some readers” comments, too…)

  • I am tired of the “eat the rich” argument. I am not rich. May never be, although I am damn sure going to try to ethically and morally get there.

    I’ll never retire if I don’t get rich. I am okay with that too….at least now. Check back with me in about 25 years or so, I may have a different perspective if I’m not in some Soviet-style gulag.

    It’s been said time and time again by many different people, if the central Federal goverment seized all capital of each and every millionaire and billionaire right now, it would equal a drop in the bucket in regards to the deficit it has made for itself. But “eat the rich” resonates with the dumb masses, so that’s the mantra that keeps getting chanted constantly and Tyrant Obama will get re-elected because of attitudes like that.

    Enjoy it. I won’t.

    • Ted Seeber

      I am for the “eat the rich” argument to some extent- but I think I’ll be retiring to the same gulag as you because I don’t follow the kill-all-children-in-the-womb orthodoxy.

  • Good to hear, CP.

    The poor are too lowfat for my tastes. Give me an insurance executive stewed in his own juices!

    • ds

      I’m a fashion designer and a father. I’m Robert Comstock and I eat Mormons.

      • Rich Fader

        Mormons? They’re rather bland, aren’t they?