Lizzie Scalia Knocks it out of the Park!

Lizzie Scalia Knocks it out of the Park! February 20, 2014

Howie Kurtz suddenly and belatedly finds himself puzzled that the State wishes to more closely run the State-run media, so Lizzie replies:

“What are they thinking?” Mr. Kurtz, it’s pretty obvious; they’re thinking no one in the mainstream press has asked them a difficult or challenging question in 7 years, so why would they start now.

  • They’re thinking an obsequious press that couldn’t be bothered to sustain outrage over intrusions into its own phone and internet records won’t have a problem with the government parking itself into the newsroom.
  • They’re thinking that if the mainstream press could forgive them for considering espionage charges against a member of the press — for doing what reporters are supposed to do — and then re-commence their habitual boot-licking, there is no real risk of media folk suddenly calling out a “red line”, or even being able to identify one.
  • They’re figuring that with this president, the mainstream media has no idea what “a bridge too far” might mean. Nor, “abuse of power”; nor “cover-up”; nor “mendacity”, “incompetence”, “ineptitude” or “constitutional illiteracy.”
  • They know that half the people in the newsroom are either married or to (or social buddies with) influential members of this government, and that everyone is all comfy and nicely settled in for the revolution.
  • They know that the press willfully surrendered its own freedoms some time ago, in the interests of ideology, and so they really won’t mind a little editorial supervision from the masters:

. . .we no longer need wonder why the mainstream media seems unconcerned about possible attacks on our first amendment rights to freedom of religion and the exercise thereof. They have already cheerfully, willfully surrendered the freedom of the press to the altar of the preferred narrative. People willing to dissolve their own freedoms so cheaply have no interest in anyone else’s freedom, either.

  • They know that if they like their newsroom, they can keep their newsroom, once it has been correctly updated. A Mad Man might sell the scheme as Prexy-Clean. Journalism “new and improved with powerful cleansing agents!”

I hope that helps, Mr. Kurtz.

"I can't watch the video because youtube must have taken it down. However according to ..."

Covington, MAGA, the Simpsons, and the ..."
"Only if you're white. If you're an 12-year-old black male, you're a full-grown man and ..."

Covington, MAGA, the Simpsons, and the ..."
"If you like building walls to keep desperate and vunarable migrants out of our country, ..."

Covington, MAGA, the Simpsons, and the ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • AquinasMan

    It’s “The Hunger Games” for news journalism. “May the Obozo be ever in your favor.”

  • SteveP

    “[MSM] have already cheerfully, willfully surrendered the freedom of the press to the altar of the preferred narrative.”

    I am very glad she repeated those words of hers in this current article. Nothing, other than that, need be said.

  • said she

    And then there’s that convenient revolving door between news organizations and political positions. Is that a feature or a bug?