Some of the Jews (as described in the Bible) loved to build “fences” around the principles of the gospel with an excess of laws, and even more excessive treatises interpreting those laws. It’s safe and easy, and requires very little faith or personal revelation to live within the fence of artificially strict, overly generalized, and often man-made interpretations.
The commenter has strictly interpreted certain statements from the Brethren and believes he/she knows how each term within those statements should be defined and applied to all members, in all circumstances. I’d be curious to hear from the commenter where the line is drawn between right and wrong on this continuum of sexual activities:
If a spouse briefly touches their own genitals during sex, is that masturbation?
If a spouse intentionally stimulates themselves during sex, is that masturbation?
If a spouse intentionally stimulates themselves while the other watches, is that sex within the bonds of marriage or sinful masturbation?
What if the other watches from a few feet away? From another room? Only listens over the phone? Is that between husband and wife, or just “between a man and his hand or woman and her vibrator [or hand]”?
What if one spouse tells the other about masturbating after the fact? Is that sharing sexual intimacy between husband and wife, or not?
Perhaps the Jews have a treatise on this very topic with clear-cut rules that we can consult.
Besides being very presumptuous about what the Brethrens‘ statements mean, your comment shows little faith in the Saints’ ability to learn correct principles and govern themselves. My point here isn’t to convince anyone that masturbation is okay, rather it’s to show that there is a gradient of differing shades of gray that require faith and thoughtful inquiry to discern the good from the bad in one’s OWN life and marriage. In my marriage, we have decided what we believe to be in perfect harmony with gospel principles and what is not. What will strengthen our bond, and what will weaken it.
Is it possible that the statements you’re mentioning aren’t as cut and dried as you claim they are? That maybe some ambiguities exist that require us to exercise our free agency and God-given intellect, in consultation with our spouse and the Spirit?
- The right that each couple has to discuss and agree on their sexual parameters between themselves and the Lord, taking into account things that have been counseled by our leaders.
- The fact that as part of human tendency we tend to box ourselves into interpretations, patterns, or behaviors we are already comfortable with. It is difficult to look at things in ways we may not agree with – or have not thought of before.
- That different situations and circumstances bring about a “shade of gray” that is not cut and dried for everyone.
I do want to clarify, although I know you already agree, that the sexual situations where you describe husband and wife self-stimulating during joint intercourse should not be deemed as inappropriate masturbation. Of course, these types of comments of mine are always made with the assumption that both spouses are comfortable with such said acts.