This is huge! It explains the worship wars and so much more.
Worshipers who frequently attend religious services are the least likely to own a pet, according to a new study analyzing data on religion and pet ownership from the 2018 General Social Survey.
But not all animals are created equal when it comes to uncovering the truth about cats and dogs and religion.
“We find a strong, negative association between worship attendance and cat ownership,” wrote researchers Samuel Perry and Ryan Burge in the Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion.
There are several reasons why devout churchgoers may prefer dogs over cats, the researchers note.
Prior studies have indicated people who own dogs tend to be higher on extraversion and agreeableness. Dogs tend to promote more pro-social activities such as going out for walks and to parks. Religious attenders who appreciate the social bonding and community they find in houses of worship may also be more predisposed to own dogs—animals that offer those same qualities.
Cat owners, in contrast, tend to be more socially isolated. They are more likely to score lower than dog owners on extraversion, agreeableness, and conscientiousness and higher on neuroticism, suggesting cat owners may be more introverted and comfortable alone.
But extraversion versus intraversion says little about whether to worship or not. It is much more revealing about whether worship should be fun and exciting or restrained and solemn. Contemporary Christian Worship lets participants think they are exuberant for Jesus. Liturgical worship, for dog lovers I guess, are signs of inhibition and over-thinking worship.
The story continues:
“Living with a cat,” Perry and Burge state, “may be the closest experience to living with a human roommate, who comes and goes as it pleases, and thus, may be a closer (albeit partial) substitute for those who would otherwise participate in social functions like church.”
Perry and Burge said the study did not permit definitive conclusions about the relation among cats, dogs, and religion; future research could be helpful in measuring changes over time and have greater controls that may account for personality characteristics such as introversion/extroversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism.But, as religious participation declines, the researchers state, it is possible that cat ownership in particular may rise “as Americans seek partial substitutes for the human interaction they might have otherwise had in church.”
Of course, this is a species-slur. Cats can be aloof, but many (the majority of the ones I know) are clingy. They don’t, however, slobber like dogs. Cats put a wet cold nose in your face.
Extended tongues and damp noses should be all you need to know about dogs or cats as a means of grace. If only mainline Protestants could keep their theological wits:
There are already signs that many religious groups are responding to and lifting up the value of pets, both for their role in what they believe as God’s creation and in response to science showing their ability to show genuine affection and provide social support that can reduce anxiety and depression and improve self-esteem.
Animal ministries that were once largely limited to Catholic churches offering annual pet blessings around the feast day of St. Francis of Assisi have become a regular part of congregational life around the country. Churches have everything from liturgical services affirming pets as part of God’s creation to pet food pantries and advocacy groups for animal rights.
Cats never fall for pet ministry.