We Need Democratic Votes to Confirm Kavanaugh. Who are They?

We Need Democratic Votes to Confirm Kavanaugh. Who are They? August 1, 2018
Photo Source: Flickr Creative Commons by kambodza https://www.flickr.com/photos/49507393@N08/

A simple run-down of the numbers shows that we need a few Democratic senators to vote to confirm Brett Kavanaugh. 

I say that on the assumption that Mr Kavanaugh would, if he was on the United States Supreme Court, vote to overturn Roe v Wade and Casey. There is, however, no proof that he would do this. 

I also say it with the proviso that I’m beginning to feel more than a little restless about the damage that the court-packing strategy is doing to my country. I do not support the union-busting, election-corrupting decisions that these extreme right-wing justices have made in the past few years. I am also more than a little bit tired of the continued social engineering that the Court cannot seem to stop doing. 

The mindless partisanship the court-packing strategy has spawned has unhinged not only our political processes, but a good part of the America electorate. People on opposite sides of the partisan divide actively hate one another with an irrational and exaggerated hatred. It has reached the point that they appear to be willing to tolerate attacks on this nation if that will help them destroy one another. 

That is insane. 

I believe that it is an outgrowth of the absolutist thinking that has been used to support the court-packing strategy on abortion. It may prove to be worth it all if we use the opportunity before us to confirm a justice who will overturn Roe and Casey. But if it doesn’t work out that way, I think we should reconsider our tactics and begin to look for other ways to do what we want. 

No one knows if Brett Kavanaugh will overturn Roe and Casey. He has made statements and issued rulings that can be interpreted either way. This may be due to the political realty of gaining a confirmation. I don’t think anyone who flat-out said they would rule to overturn could be confirmed. 

My personal pick for the next justice, Judge Amy Coney Barrett, was not nominated. Her far more public pro life positioning may be why. 

I do know that if, for some reason, Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination is not confirmed, all that will happen is that the president will make another nomination. I also know that there is a real possibility that the United States Senate will gain a few Republican votes in the November election. This is a function of which seats are open right now.

If that happens, the luxury of being to able load and re-load nominees is all on the president’s side of the game. If — and based on the seats that are open, this appears unlikely — the Democrats gain seats in the Senate, it will be more difficult to push through a nominee without making compromises. 

In my opinion, the Democrats could only gain seats in the United States Senate in November if there is a huge sweep at the polls in their favor. In an election like that, all bets are off. I don’t see that in the Senate because so many of the seats that are currently open are in Trump strongholds, and, while he is hated and despised by well over half the population, his base appears to be committed to him with what amounts to a religious fervor. 

Despite that, I would counsel Republicans to move this confirmation forward if they want to be sure of the outcome. There’s a dicey quality to dealing with an electorate as angry and divided as America is today. Nothing is writ.

Looking at how the votes shake out, it seems that the best path to confirmation is the same one taken to confirm Justice Gorsuch. His confirmation required the yes votes of three Democratic senators. They were Senator Heidi Heitcamp, Senator Joe Donnelly, and Senator Joe Manchin. 

Senator Manchin recently broke party ranks to meet with Judge Kavanaugh. Instead of greeting this with applause and supporting Senator Manchin in what is a difficult move, parts of the pro life press launched partisan salvos at him. This sort of destructive behavior makes me wonder if they are really serious about ending abortion.

I can say with absolute certainty that one of the things that Democrats tell pro life Democrats is that no one will support them and everyone will attack them. Democrats are told that if they are pro life, pro life people will not accept them and continue to attack them, while pro choice people will join in with the attacks. 

This has proven true for most pro life Democrats. It is the major reason there are so few pro life Democrats in office. Both pro life and pro choice people work to defeat them. This is so consistent that it has become a cautionary tale for any Democrat who is pro life.  

We need pro life Democrats if we are going to convert this culture. When I say this, it always falls on deaf ears. Pro life people seem to like the simplicity of hating Democrats because they are Democrats and claiming all sorts of unmerited perfection for Republicans simply because they are Republican. 

This does not advance the culture of life. What it does is conflate the sanctity of human life with a plethora of unrelated partisan issues that are in fact anti-life at their core. Political parties are not churches. They are not moral verities. They are fulcrums of power. 

Hopefully, whoever ends up replacing Kennedy on the Supreme Court will change the balance in favor of overturning Roe and Casey. Also hopefully, the Justices already on the Court will vote as we expect them to. 

The safest way to get there is to forego relying on the outcome of the November election to make confirmation easier and do the deal now with Democratic votes. Elections are willful beasts. You can’t count the votes ahead of time. 

"I didn't state that very well, sorry. Nothing wrong with the link, I just couldn't ..."

The Fallout: How to Help Women ..."
"You don't remember Lyndon Johnson doing any such thing because he didn't do any such ..."

Dr Christine Ford in Hiding Because ..."
"I haven't had the opportunity to read the FBI investigation. I'm not in the habit ..."

The Fallout: How to Help Women ..."
"Was there something wrong with the link?"

The Fallout: How to Help Women ..."

Browse Our Archives

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

7 responses to “We Need Democratic Votes to Confirm Kavanaugh. Who are They?”

  1. I believe the court packing strategy started not with abortion, but with same-sex marriage. This is just the swing of the pendulum started by the Democratic Left.

    I have little to no faith in court packing as a strategy, because both Casey and Obergefell were decided by a supposedly conservative, Republican Appointed, judge.

    And of course in my state it hardly matters if Roe exists or not. The current battle is between a pro-abortion Democrat Incumbent Governor, who spends our tax money on abortion and euthanasia, and a pro-abortion Republican who is only marginally better in that he does not want to spend tax money on abortion, but will still expand free euthanasia to get cancer patients off the state medicaid rolls.

    • Court packing has a long history in this country. The most egregious example is Franklin D. Roosevelt’s attempt in 1937 to pack the court by getting Congress to pass legislation enabling him to add more justices to the SCOTUS.

  2. I believe our politicians, who are elected by a majority of voters, are chosen by the people to reflect the same ideals as their constituents. As stated in your article, “Political parties are not churches. They are not moral verities,” we, as Christians, must be united in our beliefs to promote a culture of life with everyone we meet. If WE do a good job, the politicians we elect, regardless of their parties, WILL take the right steps to promote a culture of life instead of death. As disciples of Christ, let us continue to spread the good news for the salvation of the world!

  3. “Pro life people seem to like the simplicity of hating Democrats because they are Democrats and claiming all sorts of unmerited perfection for Republicans simply because they are Republican.”

    Suppose abortion is the only issue worth voting on and that people’s voting corresponds ONLY to the candidates’ positions on abortion. Then it’s in one party’s interest to become the prolife party and the other’s to be the prochoice party. Let’s call the two parties L and C. If someone who is pro-life runs with the C party, then L voters are obliged to vote against them regardless of ANY of the L candidate’s positions, including that of abortion. To vote in a pro-life C means giving more power to the C party and we can’t have that because the voting populace has made L the pro-life party and C the pro-choice party.

    If you want the current political situation to change, you need to convince people that their nonnegotiable issues should become negotiable and that they should not be single issue voters. Otherwise you’ll just be someone who loves unions more than babies, you baby murderer. I’m snarking, but seriously, the best way to get legislators that are responsive to what their voters want is to not ever become a predictable single issue voting bloc. Make the politicians adopt more than one good policy to ensure votes. Make ’em work for it.

    ETA: I understand that you get this. I’m still frustrated by it though.

    • So far as I know, he has always been a very conservative Republican. From everything I’ve heard, he’s normally a nice guy. The stress of having to vote for someone like Kavanaugh — and any Republican senator who votes against him is going to be a huge price — is probably just getting to him. I’ve seen it over and over, when someone is forced to see the bad thing they are doing, and they keep on dong it, they get crazy mean.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.