Fundamentalism’s Distorted View (and why you shouldn’t accept it)

Fundamentalism’s Distorted View (and why you shouldn’t accept it) February 22, 2015

Fred Clark on letting fundamentalism define religion

The quote above comes from one of several recent posts by Fred Clark, addressing the problem of allowing fundamentalism to define religion.

The other two posts are about how the fundamentalist paradigm distorts religion, and why you should not take the word of some faction when they say they are the “real true Christians.” Both those posts contain charts showing how fundamentalists equate conservativism with authentic religion. And that is no surprise – what should surprise us is that very frequently that equation is accepted without question even by people who are not themselves part of such fundamentalist groups.

Of related interest, Eric Reitan tackles a problematic Facebook meme. And Haroon Moghul responds in Salon to Graeme Wood’s article about ISIS in The Atlanticwhich a lot of the above is interacting with.

And of course, a lot of this discussion is also interacting with President Obama’s recent comments about Islam:
"The way that I read it, it is institutional Religion that is anti-christ."

Duel of the Antichrists
"Supercessionism actually happened, becoming solid over the course of 2nd c. By contrast, the idea ..."

The Aims and Ending of Luke-Acts
"Even more stunning is the fact that in German, Biden Harris could be roughly translated ..."

Duel of the Antichrists
"This is why I don't think literalists get to take the "high ground" when it ..."

Statement of Faith for Biblical Literalists

Browse Our Archives