Back in October, I was privileged to give a keynote talk at a conference at the Toronto School of Theology (virtually, of course) on “Value and Valuing.” The talk focused on the relationship between ritualization and play behavior in humans and animals, comparing the granular features of animal play with human play, and setting animal ritualization alongside human rituals. Along the way, I discussed the spectacular mating dances of crested grebes (which feature birds improbably slinging weeds at each other while paddling furiously underwater, inspiring the biologist Julian Huxley to coin the term “ritualization”), the protocol of British knighting ceremonies, and the evolutionary backdrop of the smile.
My basic claim was that the formal features of ritual — including repetitiveness, stereotypy, formality, exaggeration, and goal demotion — are what enable human beings to send clear messages about ideas, such as institutional norms or agreements, that otherwise would be worryingly ambiguous, because they’re not rooted in objective, physically apparent facts. Animals use ritualization in a similar way — for example, repeatedly acting out exaggerated action sequences in order to clearly communicate that their intentions are friendly or amorous rather than aggressive. In this way, across the human and animal worlds, ritualized behavior is what extracts signal from noise, clarifying and streamlining the social environment.
You can check out the full recording of the talk below. There are some illuminating slides and attempts at funny jokes. Thanks to the TST Graduate Students’ Association for hosting the conference, to all other attendees and participants for their contributions, and to Colleen Shantz of St. Michael’s College for facilitating the connection.
To American readers: Happy Thanksgiving.