7 years ago: A surge of ‘more’

7 years ago: A surge of ‘more’ December 31, 2013

December 31, 2006, here on slacktivist: A surge of ‘more’

The idea of a troop surge — it’s never clear what these new troops would be doing — arises from the enduring myths about Why We Lost Vietnam. We coulda/shoulda won, the myth says, if we hadn’t lost our nerve, or if we’d committed more troops, or more bombs, or moremoremore of, you know, that stuff we coulda won with if we’d only used more of it.

Part of the reason this myth endures is that there were things that America could have done in Vietnam, and chose not to do. And many of those things have proven effective in the past. Look back a few decades earlier in American history to the enormously effective counter-insurgency our forces employed in the Philippines. Trouble with insurgents in a village? Kill all the adult males. Create gulags and ghettos for the pacified civilian population. Kill 50 civilians for every one of your own soldiers slain. It’s not pretty, but it is effective. (See also Caesar’s successful conquest of Gaul; the successful restoration of order in Tianenmen Square; or the very successful counter-insurgency carried out in Dujail, Iraq, in 1982 by the recently deceased former leader of that country.)

"Three, two, one, let's jam. looks incredibly promising. The people who put the opening together ..."

A night with Lot in Sodom, ..."
"They are already calling themselves Christians despite going against Jesus's teachings in any and every ..."

Feeling unknown and you’re all alone
"It's an interesting solution to the problem of people hogging stuff up. Besides "you get ..."

A night with Lot in Sodom, ..."
"Hmm, okay. This was indeed run by a non-profit (my church at the time), but ..."

A night with Lot in Sodom, ..."

Browse Our Archives