Has the NY Times addressed this yet?

Just asking.

I mean, I have seen lots of bloggers, beginning with Michelle (who has a nice exchange of letters between the craven Times and a soldier) writing about how the NY Times Dowdified the letters of a dead soldier, essentially changing the whole thesis of the letter, in order to serve their own agenda.

I was just wondering if anyone knew whether the Times had actually addressed any of this publicly? Do you think they will?

I mean, I haven’t seen the MSM yet address the Lies of Massey with the energy with which they embraced him, yet. It would be really good if they could manage this.