Collected in my tab-bar since I started feeling cruddy – might as well share with you all the things I have either read or “been meaning to get to reading…” All submitted mostly without comment, because I’m still not 100%.
The president went on to say that while America will strengthen its defenses, “we will not succumb to a siege mentality that sacrifices the open society and liberties and values that we cherish as Americans, because great and proud nations don’t hunker down and hide behind walls of suspicion and mistrust.”
“That is exactly what our adversaries want,” he said. “And so long as I am president, we will never hand them that victory.”
Yeah…that’s one of the reasons Bush said, after 9/11, “go shopping, go on vacation.” And it’s one of the reasons Bush put into place all those “Imperialist” and “constitution-shredding” measures that Obama has kept in place.
Apparently, the Obama administration came into office in January 2009 thinking that the notion of a “war on terror” was archaic and largely had been an excuse for the Bush-Cheney nexus to scare the nation for partisan political purposes. Given the long period of calm after 9/11, the somnolent “good” war in Afghanistan, and the sudden quiet in the “bad” Iraq theater, Obama preferred to focus on Bush’s constitution-shredding rather than on national security. What vestigial danger remained could be changed by the charisma of Barack Obama, the obvious appeal of his ancestry to the Muslim world, and the ritual demonization of George Bush.
But Obama has discovered that there really are radical Islamic threats; that Bush’s record of seven years of security was no accident; and that the “good” war is heating up. Obama has been forced by events to quietly find ways of emulating Bush’s successful anti-terrorism formula, while making loud but empty declarations to mollify his liberal base (which so far seems pacified that Guantanamo is “virtually” closed, and that KSM is “virtually” facing an ACLU dream trial).
Radical Islamists sense, fairly or not, that this administration is angrier at prior officials who kept us safe than it is at those who wish to destroy us for who we are. Given his adoption of the Bush protocols, Obama might show the same magnanimity toward his predecessor that he does toward the Muslim world.
“We are at war; we are at war against Al Qaeda…” Reality Strikes Home.
Drew wonders: “. . .if we are at war with al Qaeda as Obama just said, why are we sending them to civilian courts?” I’m glad the president is “less interested in passing out blame…” Perhaps, a year into his presidency, the daily Bush-blaming will end.
No Specific Mention of “Terrorism” in Undie-bomber Indictment
Further Limitations on Civil Liberties:
Many of us said during the days of the Bush administration that restrictions on civil liberties motivated by the conflict with Al Qaeda would be maintained during any subsequent administration, whether Democratic or Republican, as long as the terrorist threat remained. This prediction has been amply confirmed. The most recent example is the implementation of an explicit profiling program for airline passengers. The ACLU aside, there has not been much criticism of this initiative. (Maybe because some of the most prominent critics of the Bush administration’s counterterror policies are now members of the Obama administration.)
The persistence of policies across ideologically divided administrations is good evidence that those policies are now mainstream rather than partisan and ideological. Of course, many people will continue to disagree with them, just as many people continue to object to a standing army and a central bank; but these people are now officially on the fringes. There will also continue to be arguments about interrogation practices and the like, but a wide range of Bush administration policies—indefinite detention without charges, trials by military commission, the use of military force against suspected terrorists in foreign countries, secrecy privileges that undermine litigation against government officials responsible for terrorism policies, profiling on the basis of nationality, and much else—are now politically entrenched.
Is Obama raising a mustache?
“Buck Stops With Me”; Ace Not Having It
What Does the Detroit Bomber Know and is the US interested in finding out?
Year One W/ President at War with Reality
“All Major Taliban Leaders are Former Gitmo Prisoners”
Gitmo Prisoners want to stay in Cuba. Damn straight. It’s warmer, there.
Christian Conservatism as Myth
Here is What Really Worries the Pentagon
Spending is Up Over 23% Under Obama
…it always ends in this or a similar manner: and so with angels and archangels and the whole company of heaven we sing the unending hymn of your praise: Holy, Holy, Holy…. And thus we are reminded that our worship is caught up into the heavenly liturgy where our voices join innumerable angels and saints in the glorious act of praise. We are in heaven! Our hearts (our very selves) are aloft! . . . Until recently Churches were designed to remind us that we were entering heaven. As we walk into older churches we are surrounded by windows and paintings that depict the angels and saints. Christ is at the center in the tabernacle. And all the elements that scripture speaks of as in the heavenly liturgy are on display not only in the building but in the celebration of the liturgy: Candles, incense, an altar, the hymns that are sung, the Holy Holy Holy, the scroll is brought forward in the Book of Gospels, the lamb on the throne-like altar, , the prostrations and kneelings of the saints before the Lord. All these things are described in the Book of Revelation descriptions of the heavenly liturgy. None of these things are in our churches or the liturgy for arbitrary reasons. We are in the heavenly realms and the heavenly liturgy and so we see and experience heavenly things. Hearts aloft!
2009 Study Confirms Abortion/Breast Cancer Link. Wrote about this from an intuitive standpoint, ages ago.
Geithners Fed Told AIG to Limit Swaps Disclosure
Obama Used Us as A Political Football!
Why Are Empires Buried Under Afghanistan?
Newtie Not Lovin’ the Obama Machine
Letterman Offends Gays, Transgendered. Hmmm, that reminds me of this anecdote:
Louise Casselman, who was at that White House Yale reunion with her husband, Kirk Casselman and a Bay Area contingent, says that although Yale was still all-male in 1968, one alum has since had a sex-change operation. “You might remember me as Peter when we left Yale,” said the woman upon coming face to face with the president. George W. didn’t pause for a moment, reports Casselman, grabbed the alumna’s hand, and said “Now you’ve come back as yourself.”
Who are the intolerant morons, again?
Britain faces coldest night yet and The UK Has 8 Days of Gas Left. Better be nice to Putin.
Worldwide Cold Not Seen since ’70’s Ice Age Scare
Climategate and the Migrating Arctic Tree Line
What Happened to the Republicans I used to Know?
Michael Totten Excellent Interview w/ Christopher Hitchens
Alicia Colon: Compares her chest pains to Rush Limbaugh’s
WH: Hey, we told our counterterror chief to keep skiing after the Christmas bomber…. Panetta stayed on vacation too. Come on! Terrorism was not supposed to be real or serious, anymore!
One Hour of Obamacare Negotiations
Constitutional Crisis and Security Crisis
All 3 Domestic Terror Attacks of 2009 were Enabled by WH Reverse Profiling Orders…
King James Bible, Catholic Edition
Do Only Radical Pacifists Oppose Torture?
Pro-Abortion Women and the US Army
The Ongoing Evolution of Secular Messianic Jesus
An anti-inflammatory drug that can prevent skin cancer?