Heaven, Hell and Rob Bell – A series on Love Wins: Introduction

As part of the preparation for my face to face debate with Rob Bell, I created an extensive set of notes to make sure I was clear what I wanted to say. I originally felt that I wanted to at least delay commenting on this issue,  but I have now decided that this is a sufficiently important controversy, with sufficient interest from others,  and so much at stake, that I should convert that set of notes into a fairly substantial series of posts. This won’t take the form of a review as such, although it is definitely a response to the book, and theological reflection.

To start out with, I should stress that there is no doubt this is a book Rob has written out of deep conviction, shaped by his own experiences  and that he has always aimed to communicate well with those who feel damaged by Christian expressions and are in danger of rejecting the church altogether.

At the beginning of the debate, I stated something that I would like to repeat here: I am sorry that some have been quite hurtful and hateful towards Rob, (especially some bloggers who some call the pyjama hadin!) I have no intention to be hateful to anyone but every Christian has to “contend for the faith once for all delivered to us”  (Jude 1:2).

It is not enough for Rob to claim that other Christians have slandered him. I hope that through listening to the debate you will be able to hear clearly what it is he is trying to say.  There is a tendency for many in the camp I call “neo-liberals” to say “you just don’t understand me” but the job of a communicator is to communicate!  When discussing some of the key themes of Rob’s book in interviews he seems to be reluctant to come out and state exactly what he believes.  In fact I felt that debating Rob Bell was a lot like debating Jello.  But the very act of questioning in a mocking manner makes it very clear that on many issues he does not hold to the more traditional view. There is no doubt now in my mind that he is clearly rejecting perspectives many evangelicals hold dear.

I have to say when it comes to this book it does sadden me.  It saddens me because it is not true to the Scripture.  It is not enough to accumulate verses that are torn out of context to explain a notion that doesn’t spring from the Scriptures.  Rob seems to me to often bring something to the Bible and wraps verses around  so he can claim the Bible supports his human reasoning.  He approaches the Bible in a very different way from typical evangelicals.

But we must remember that everything we know about hell comes from the mouth of Jesus himself.    Jesus doesn’t play games. Therefore this is error.  The problem with error, is that this becomes deception and it leads people astray.

In Rob’s book he says ““No one can resist God’s pursuit forever because God’s love will eventually melt even the hardest hearts” (page 108)” This sounds very much like he believes that because “love wins” everyone will be saved.  But when he says love wins he means TOLERANCE wins and God will tolerate anything at the end of the day

My concern is that Rob and others do not agree with a simple interpretation of what Jesus told us about the most fearsome risk we all face.  This is the risk of an eternity without God in hell.

If someone announced that they had found the cure for death, we wouldn’t tolerate them, and hopefully they wouldn’t become a millionaire overnight by hitting the bestseller list.  They’d be put in prison for fraud.  There is a fearsome responsibility of saying (or even just implying) to the world that there is no hell, or at least not in the sense of eternal conscious punishment for those who reject Christ in this life. What if there is a hell after all?

Rob is saying “peace peace” when there is no peace! He is like a snake oil salesman getting rich from telling people what they want to hear, but that is placing their souls in jeopardy.  What is to stop someone reading Rob’s book and saying “great then in that case I will commit as much sin as possible in this life and then repent in the next?”  People already say sometimes that they will delay repentance to their death bed (which is a dangerous idea as not everyone has a death bed as such).  What a tragedy if someone relies on a post-mortum opportunity to turn to Jesus millions of people have understood the Bible never offers.

About Adrian Warnock

Adrian Warnock has been a blogger since April 2003, and a member of Jubilee Church, London since 1995, where he seves as part of the leadership team alongside Tope Koleoso.

Together they have written Hope Reborn - How to Become a Christian and Live for Jesus, published by Christian Focus.

Adrian is also the author of Raised With Christ - How The Resurrection Changes Everything, published by Crossway.

Read more about Adrian Warnock or connect with him on Twitter, Facebook or Google+.

**********************************

You are warmly invited to comment on this blog. By doing o you demonstrate that you accept Adrian's comment policy.

      • RelapsedCt

        I didn’t realize how long ago this discussion was, and I’m not sure I can get through to you any better. I’ll try anyway. You keep using the phrase “evangelical truth” which I find troubling because you’re not using the phrase Biblical truth.

        During the discussion, you were insistent on identifying yourself and people who thought like you as “evangelical” and Rob as something other than that. However, I think Rob made it clear that he was making an effort to align his beliefs with what he felt the writers of the Bible actually intended to say rather than with what all evangelicals believed it was saying.

        Rob was saying, “A study of the language and the context reveals the way we should understand these passages.” While you repeatedly said, “Most evangelical studying says it means this, and because of that I’m concerned.” You completely fail to acknowledge Rob’s efforts to try to be true to what scholars and theologians understand that Scripture actually says. Instead, your fixation and embrace of the “evangelical truth” leaves you “deeply concerned” that he doesn’t think the same way you and people in tune with your way of thinking think. In that podcast and in those blog posts, you’re so set on his rejection of “evangelical truth”, you are unable to appreciate how Rob’s writing is an attempt to reflect Biblical truth.

      • Kish

        I have read his book and find nothing wrong with his theology. He clearly believes in Hell and he states that God wants to reconcile himself with all people which is what the Bible says. He also talks about after this life it could be that people can accept Jesus as Lord. The Bible is not clear on this but why not? Also the book does not say everyone will go to Heaven he even alludes to the fact that some will not want to join the party Heaven so some people will be in hell forever whatever hell is.


      CLOSE | X

      HIDE | X