Heathen Woman: Hidden Agendas in Heathenry

Heathens generally own their own actions proudly, and they realize that comes with a large dose of accountability and mindful thought about how we spend our energy. Agendas belonging to others do not dictate our values and ethics, nor does formalized doctrine absolve us from having ethics or excuse us when we act with dishonor.

However, heathen groups attempting to take a stand on a controversial issue sometimes take a downward turn. Initially, most people will support such a stand if its pretense is to rid the community of something dishonorable. Then slowly, those initial intentions become blurred and the purpose is lost, due to an underlying hidden agenda. When a group leans heavily into a particular side of politics, and those politics are pushed into the faith, emotions tend to rule the ensuing discussions. Radicalism on every side of the political spectrum exists in all faiths, but embracing radical politics is rarely an effective means of positive community building.

Heathens have historical precedents on this issue. Snorri himself had more than eight chieftaincies in his lifetime and made a living at community building. His fatal flaw, however, was having a huge ego and serving his own agenda rather than attending to the best interests of his community. Those actions turned many of his own supporters against him, and he eventually was murdered in his own home. His political stances were controversial, but his personal agendas swallowed him.

The heart of a warrior does not lie in inciting conflict but rather in determining when, and at what point, a necessary action needs to be taken–not to divide, but to restore the basic principles of honor and stability. That is the difference between working for a cause in logical way versus responding to one based on pure emotion. Odin was a war chieftain, a role that many heathens both admire and respect. This would have required him to consider his responsibilities to those he was charged with overseeing. As heathens who aim to walk in the footsteps left by the gods, our own endeavors become ones that need to reflect our values and character. What we stand for, condone, and create becomes part of our wyrd, and we accept full accountability for the success or consequence.

However, it has become commonplace for some groups to use the heathen platform in order to serve an agenda. The real problem with this is that it only serves to divide an already small community of individuals, rather than finding and cultivating a common ground that builds the heathen community. Rarely are self-serving groups seen providing any sort of education or advocating the restoration of heathen values that were inherent to our ancestors. In fact, these particular groups hardly explore anything that relates to heathenry outside of how it may apply to their cause. They proudly wave the heathen flag to solicit support and end up doing nothing that does anything remotely constructive. Instead, they tend to be extremely vocal yet accomplishing little.

The reason for this is usually that heathens as a whole do not wish to further separate themselves from each other in order to cater to someone else’s agenda, be it political or personal. We are highly individualistic in our faith, and when we commit ourselves to a cause or group, we do not want it to be something that only services the ego of a few misguided individuals. Heathens are generally very proud of their willingness to own up to their actions and form their decisions accordingly. The causes we choose to support are usually ones that we feel will reflect heathen values and build honor. Where such causes derail is when the group(s) endorsing said cause are actually just hungry for attention and exposure and happy to create disputes with other heathens and the larger community with little if any real resolution. Simply stated, people don’t like wasting their time and energy serving someone else’s goals, especially goals based on mere perception, broadly-based accusations, or personal trifles.

Why not devote the same energy into bridging gaps through logic and education, which helps recognize and restore commonality and shared goals and builds the heathen network of individuals? Heathens are still a growing group trying to reclaim our customs, traditions, and faith. Agendas that aim to divide us do us no good. Historically speaking, chieftains often worked very hard to ensure that the people they were responsible for were conducting themselves in a way that was beneficial to self, home, family and larger community. Without this type of unification, small tribes would have lived in a state of disarray and unpreparedness. There was a prescribed way of resolving conflicts at the Thing. In other words, there was a logical time and place for airing grievances and settling disputes. The rest of the time was spent tending to family and community welfare. They focused on commonality, not division.

As strong individuals, we are fully capable of championing our own causes, ones that we feel coordinate with our values and build honor. Our ability to determine those values is not dependent on someone else’s effort to stake a claim on a particular platform. The quickest way to tell whether the leadership of a particular cause is legitimate or agenda-driven is to investigate the leader’s past actions within the community, ask questions of their peers, and look at where they personally stand on other issues. Does the group tend to cause deliberate divides amongst heathens? Are they known for their good character? Do their actions reflect your values? When coupled with logical planning, dialogue, and active commitment, a group that unifies rather than divides keeps the integrity of how our ancestors lived within tribal communities – as well as providing a reasonable approach to bridging gaps.

About Heather O'Brien

Heather O’Brien is an interfaith clergy member and Founder of Women of Asatru. She writes and speaks on heathen related topics pertaining to heathen reconstruction, Norse mythology, and European folk lore.

Heather has been studying Germanic tribal reconstruction and Celto-Germanic mythology for over fifteen years, and is in the process of writing a book that focuses on supporting and encouraging heathen women. She has also written for columns pertaining to organic homesteading.

  • Lēoht “Sceadusawol” Steren

    Snorri was a Christian (and died like one – on his knees, begging), so not a great example to use.

    • Heather O’Brien

      That was the point. If you’ll read through the example of him in the article; it shows that his own personal reasoning (of which his faith was a certainly a part) and his agendas were his downfall. They did not preserve his integrity, they dismantled it. It’s precisely why he makes a good example.

      • Lēoht “Sceadusawol” Steren

        Fair point. My initial reading interpreted you as implying that he was a Heathen. (As opposed to a Christian living well over a century after the conversion of Iceland.)

  • chirisdex

    As powerful people, we are completely able of championing our own causes, ones that we think organize with our principles and develop respect. Our capability to figure out those principles is not reliant on another person’s attempt to share a declare on a particular system. The fastest way to tell whether the management of a particular cause is genuine or agenda-driven is to examine the leader’s previous activities within the group, ask concerns of their colleagues, and look at where they individually take a position on other problems. Does the team usually cause purposeful separates amongst heathens? Are they known for their good character? Do their activities indicate your values? When along with sensible preparing, conversation, and effective dedication, a team that unifies rather than separates keeps the reliability of how our forefathers resided within tribe areas – as well as offering a affordable strategy to connecting holes.

    NyLotto

    • Lēoht “Sceadusawol” Steren

      This just seems like a rewording of the final paragraph. Any particular reason for that?

      • yewtree

        in order to promote “NyLotto”, whatever that may be. I think it is a spam comment.

  • Joseph

    I think your point might be much better made if you named names here, rather than writing in broad generalities. It seems like this is a response to *something*, but I read this and come away not knowing what, exactly, you’re talking about.

    • Alyxander M Folmer

      Seconded.

    • yewtree

      Same here. Is it about a particular group that is using Heathenry to further its own agenda? I kept waiting for a specific example.

  • http://rokuism.blogspot.com/ Roku

    This is the most perfect thing I’ve ever read. It describes exactly my experiences with feminism in the pagan and geek communities, but is written without intent to shame or bully those in the wrong.

    • Alyxander M Folmer

      Really? Did you somehow miss the giant shame rant in that exact post you just commented on?

  • Joseph Koerner

    Thank you for posting this, Heather.

    Roku. Feminism is exactly what I was thinking of too when I read it. I begin to think they are as bad as the neo-Nazis when it comes to creating division and destruction in the Heathen community. Any difference of opinion makes you their worst possible enemy. A cult-like adherence to their political philosophy, their first love and loyalty, is the set of coke-bottle lenses they will judge your form of Heathenry by. And trust me, they will even feel free to actively destroy your relationships in service to that end. Heathenry exists to serve feminism, period.
    It’s quite obvious where this tendency is coming from. Former Wiccans coming to Heathenry after getting bored with the former, as endless novelty-seeking is their passion. Whiney-waddling-Whedon-Worshipping-LeWellyn-Wading-Witchy-Warrior-Women-Wannabes who enjoy cos-playing the powerful women they will never be. They don’t even have control of their own minds, let alone hold powers of prophecy or supernatural influence.
    Meanwhile, popular culture (a main source for feminist Heathenry) continues to feed this. The Vikings television series gives them their Xena fantasy, despite the fact that Lagertha is obviously Saxo’s humanized version of the goddess Hladgerd, following Saxo’s habit of un-divining the pagan gods. BBC releases the documentary “Divine Woman”, whereupon the host recites long-debunked notions of matriarchal power in prehistorical Turkey, only to throw in a short “these ideas are now being challenged, but,,”. But nothing…you just woefully misinformed the public and filled their head with fantasy, Professor Hughes. Also on BBC, Team Time shows another feminist professor proclaiming a find a woman warrior grave based on pelvic measurements, when Professor Cox herself knows that only DNA testing can prove that. I’m still searching for the DNA test results on that last one, but there is a hushed silence to any attempt to find it. Can you say…political cover-up?
    As much as feminist seem to hate the “Mad Men” era, they sure do love staying there in their anthropology. Time to leave advancing “the Divine Feminine” as a central thrust to Heathenry behind. Murray and Gimbutas are dead and it is time to bury the notions they bore with them. A New Heathenry that allows for positive self-images for both sexes is one that will advance the folkway, rather than tear it apart from within.

    • yewtree

      It seems to me that you are massively stereotyping feminists. The kind of feminism you refer to that believed in the ancient matriarchy was a particular subset of second-wave feminists. It has largely been superseded by a more nuanced understanding of history and of gender politics.

      As to your comments about Wicca… I can’t even…

  • Pingback: Hidden Agendas in Heathenry « WiccanWeb

  • Pingback: yellow october


CLOSE | X

HIDE | X