The Glory of Being Shut Up

“Christ prophesied the whole of Gothic architecture in that hour when nervous and respectable people (such people as now object to barrel organs) objected to the shouting of the gutter-snipes of Jerusalem. He said, “If these were silent, the very stones would cry out.” Under the impulse of His spirit arose like a clamorous chorus the facades of the mediaeval cathedrals, thronged with shouting faces and open mouths. The prophecy has fulfilled itself: the very stones cry out.”
G. K. C.

We lost something important when our Western culture ‘outgrew’ its infatuation with obscenely large cathedrals, ornate basilicas, dark stone chapels, stretching towers and lonely crypts. We lost something important – a unique human experience – when we began our relationship with the plaster-church over the ‘old-school’ church.

We lost our awareness of the power of Place, specifically, its power to shut us up. Have you ever seen a group of tourists walk into a basilica? Let’s call them Americans, post-Christian agnostics – their names are Deborah, Stella and Mike – who respect the great artistic achievements of the Old Church without respect for the Old Church. They walk in through the creaking, wooden side-door; they are talking about their diet plans, and the relative evils of cholesterol. Through the door now, (they smell the incense), into the foyer, (they feel the cool of the stone ease away the heat of the day from their skin), and past the first arch. Wait for it, wait for it…now. Their words die on their lips. Mouths open loosely, and necks crane instinctively upwards. Their group loosens, they begin to wander away from each other, Deborah towards the candles, Stella towards Our Lady of Sorrows, Mike towards the altar, each waltzing in small circles as they try to take everything in. How many times I’ve seen this, and how many more times I’ve performed this little unconscious ritual; this silent transformation; this unrequested dance.

The beauty of a basilica is that men do not visit it, it visits men. The beauty of it, yes, but also the rudeness of that dark, stone temple, for it is a hand clamped over the modern mouth, a sturdy grasp guiding one through side-chapels. It demands that you – Mike – center yourself. Here are the pews on either side, the symmetrical side-chapels, everything mirrored and proportional, even the interlacing tessellations of granite that spread out from a single star on the floor. Stand on the star. Then look straight ahead. There are two things that everything else seems to reflect from. Two things in this building that form and beauty and structure emanate from. One is you, in the center of the church, having wandered their almost by by necessity, by the strange force of the symmetry all around you. The other is the tabernacle. Of the two, choose now whom you will serve.

Every cathedral makes this bold, arrogant challenge to the visiting man. The sheer size, scope and intricacy of these temples speaks of the total, radical commitment men gave to God; to build Him a dwelling place, even if they were not to see it complete; to serve him. These living stones are their pronounced fiat; their yes; their choice. What is yours? For when you leave, the tabernacle will remain. The Body of Christ will stay – the red candle still burn – and the basilica will circle and reflect around it, like ripples in a pool, emanating from the drop of some inexplicable and sublime stone.

What does a plaster-church say? “I will not be here long.” What does a cathedral say? “You cannot deny me. For I’ve outlasted your forefathers, and I’ll outlast you.” The cathedral speaks of the endurance of Catholicism. This is not to deny the beauty of a simple church, of the awesome fact that the universal quality of Catholicism means that we can celebrate mass in our living rooms, our shelters, canoes and battle-fields. This is simply to lament that the age of the Cathedral is done, the age where one was silenced, for perhaps the briefest of moments in a life filled with noise, and brought to worship. Oh, perhaps the tourists would never acknowledge that they perform an act of worship, walking into a basilica. But what else are we to call it, when we all shut up, slow ourselves and walk small-stepped in awe, reduced to whispers and peace? The Catholic Church holds that worship is not something we do. No, worship is a gift we receive. I hold that the cathedrals, basilicas and lasting chapels of the Church are awesome conveyors of that gift, rudely thrusting worship into the hearts of all who enter them.

But perhaps there is one place left where one can experience this bit of humanity. I speak, of course, of the library, where my writings are written. It would not be unwise for the seeking, modern man, to stand in some old, dusky library, close his eyes amidst the books that surround him, and think of how such a little peace would be magnified, if he were surrounded by saints, angels, pilgrims, prayers, cool stone and holy incense. A man in a library - if he is a man at all – is humbled by the mass of human knowledge, wisdom and understanding that surrounds him. A man in a cathedral is humbled because he, as a member of the human race, has performed the incredible and audacious act of surrounding the unsurroundable God with stone.

  • Paula

    very insightful. thanks, Marc.

  • Anonymous

    Cobbett pointed to England’s cathedrals as sufficient evidence that the mainstream (Protestant) English view of history was bogus. I really doubt he could’ve done that if they’d been “plaster churches”.

    On the other hand, Spanish mission-style is plaster, and some of those are as old as Baroque. San Xavier del Bac, on the Tohono O’odham (formerly Papago) Reservation in Arizona, certainly doesn’t feel transitory (though it is only 200 years old in its current form).

  • http://defend-us-in-battle.blogspot.com Joseph K.

    Another “feature” of intentionally blank plaster churches is where the focus falls, or maybe is placed. Our eyes made to wander, our ears to listen for the loudest sound… and so what do our senses fall upon? One another and not God.

    Good pos.

  • http://www.thinveil.net Brandon Vogt

    Stunningly beautiful. (Cathedrals and your writing.)

  • http://tonylayne.blogspot.com/ Anthony S. Layne

    Well and wonderfully written, Marc!

  • Michelle Thuldanin

    Amen.

  • jeni

    beautiful post.

    Or if they are my friends, they will visit a cathedral then post status updates on FB how they can’t believe they were told they couldn’t bring their starbucks inside. And when I asked why they would want to bring starbucks in, then tried to explain nicely why that isn’t done and the presence of Christ in the Eucharist, I got blasted for being “why catholics get a bad rap.” Oy. I wish I could have posted this then.

  • Anonymous

    I visited Rome in June, and 5 months later, I am still processing the effect of the great churches. What kind of Christian emerges after a lifetime of worship in such beauty, and what kind of Christian emerges after a lifetime of worship in what can only be described as “the chapel on the Enterprise?” (We have a church in our city which would qualify). The Church in earlier times seems to have known that we are formed in part by our surroundings, and was wise enough to give us surroundings which would mold us in specific ways. Thanks be to God that these old Churches still stand to do this to Christians who visit, and to the non-Christians who wander in as tourists.

  • Bill Smith

    This post left me with a similar speechlessness as what you describe in it. Though we don’t share the same beliefs, I must agree with the sentiment and respect for the grandeur of the past. I actually was just thinking the other day about the untapped energy a library holds, and what intangible power a place like that holds. Excellent writing.


CLOSE | X

HIDE | X