Poverty and the “Model Minority”

As Asian Pacific American Heritage Month draws to a close during this election year, I wanted to draw attention to the issue of poverty as it remains quite significant in light of the recent recession. Believe it or not, poverty is a real issue for Asian Americans. I write this with the understanding that many Americans hold to an onerous stereotype sometimes described as the model minority myth.  

The myth asserts that certain minorities are so exemplary in their socioeconomic achievements that they stand apart in contrast to those “other minorities” who don’t share the same degree of material success. Asian Americans are described as being today’s model minority. The singular number is intentional as American society likes to keep race and ethnicity simple: apparently all Asian Americans are alike in their successes. How do we know this? The Census! When you see Census figures based on race, it sure looks like Asian Americans do stand out. In the past 2 censuses they showed above average incomes. What accounts for this remarkable feat?

Part of the answer lies in questioning what we mean by “Asian.” When we look at the same Census information and split Asian Americans into particular demographic cuts we find that this “Asian” similarity of success only applies to a very select group within this racial label.

One way to demonstrate this is to study those who aren’t doing so well economically. That’s what Drs. Isao Takei and Arthur Sakamoto did in an article published last year. If a group is supposedly doing really well economically, we would expect that they would have a lower proportion in poverty. As Takei and Sakamoto show however, different Asian Americans are sometimes proportionally more in absolute poverty (where household income is lower than the threshold established by the Census of minimal standard of living for the composition of the household) and relative poverty (living below 50 percent of median household income [adjusting for composition of household]). Another way to think of these is relative poverty = working poor (households with limited welfare assistance but basically cover the minimum of their bills) and absolute poverty = the poor needing welfare assistance. These are like concentric circles where anyone in absolute poverty is also in relative poverty by definition.

Using data from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (which Congress wants to discontinue) for 2005 and 2007, they were able to show the following

screen capture from article p260 of Sociological Perspectives 2011

I know it’s a lot, you can’t accuse them of not being thorough. In 2005-2007, White non-Hispanic absolute poverty was about 9%, and relative poverty is 18%. Asian American absolute poverty in that same time frame and sample is 10% and relative poverty is about 20% – these are significantly higher than non-Hispanic whites statistically speaking. If Asian America is about 17 million people this means that at least 2-3 million are in poverty. Keep in mind that the ACS is usually not translated, so we don’t know if there are more folks in poverty if they don’t return the survey because they can’t read it.

Overall Asian Americans are not proportionally less in poverty compared to non-Hispanic whites. But Takei and Sakamoto don’t stop there. They also showed the poverty rates for different kinds of non-Hispanic whites and different kinds of Asian Americans so that we’re really comparing apples with apples so to speak. The average starting age of minimal financial dependence on one’s parents they use is 25 years. So they show that 6.9% of whites who were born in the US and 25 or older were in absolute poverty. About 5.4% of US born Asians 25 and older were in absolute poverty. This particular cut of the Asian American population seems to exhibit the socioeconomic success that seems to be ascribed to the entire group – hence the problem of stereotypes. It would be almost excusable (almost) for this stereotype’s persistence if US born Asian Americans over the age of 24 were the majority, but they constitute less than a third of Asian America.

Notably, look at the list of Asian ethnic group poverty rates- the variation is enormous. On the one end about 5.4% of Filipino Americans are in absolute poverty whereas 27.7% of Hmong Americans are in this same category – and yet both groups are lumped together as Asian American.

In the new millennium we’re able to learn about how mixed-race Americans fare as well. Again the differences from white non-Hispanic poverty rates are huge. Only 4.1% of Chinese-Filipinos are in poverty, but some might say that this is not a real racial-mix in America-after all, both groups are Asian. So the next lowest group in absolute poverty would be White-Chinese at 7.1%. And at the other extreme, 18.5% of Black-Koreans are in absolute poverty.

So we have more evidence that there’s a ton of socioeconomic diversity among Asian Americans and calls into question why we hold onto stereotypes that presume that they are all model minorities. And we would only know this as a result of the American Community Survey. Such awareness can do a world of good in correcting our preconceived notions of race and socioeconomic attainment. And it’s worth thinking about who are the poor in our own environments. Some of them will be Asian American.

Share your other observations about any other patterns you see in this table. And get a copy of the article, there’s lots more illuminating detail.

Asian Americans on the Move

I recently had a chance to see the new Avengers movie and one of the characters, Tony Stark mentioned that he had a hankering for shawarma. And that made me think: “Yeah some shawarma would be pretty good. Hmm, I could sure go for some Indian food right now too. Hey when was the last time I had it? Sigh.) You see, I had returned to an old realization. After having lived in Waco, Texas for almost 8 years now, there is still not a single Indian restaurant for over 50 miles in any direction.

I still remember the challenges in adapting to a place that looked largely devoid of Asian Americans. Indeed I wasn’t too far off the mark as the Census data from 2000 showed that about 1.4% of the city was Asian while the national percentage at the time was about 4%. When I left South Bend, IN where I attended graduate school I left one of the least populated Asian American cities (it was 1.2% in 2000, and now 1.3% or about 1,349 people), for a city that had a couple hundred more Asian Americans in the Waco area. Today Waco estimates of the Asian population are around 1.9% or 2330 people.

find more at http://www.city-data.com/races/races-South-Bend-Indiana.html  find more at  http://www.city-data.com/races/races-Waco-Texas.html

But if there’s one thing I learned soon enough: Texans love driving. And as it turns out, I was part of one of the biggest shifts in the Texas population over the decade between the two censuses. The Asian population in the US grew from 10.2 million to 14.6 million – this was a much faster growth than any other racially-defined group in the US. Much of this growth was due to more immigration from Asia than childbirth (Asian American family size is about on par with replacement levels). On top of that, new Asian immigrants and longterm Asian Americans (whether born and raised in the US or simply residing in the US for more than a decade) were not staying in the traditional spaces that our popular imagination placed them. Sure, California is king, where over 30% of Asian America is in that state alone. And New York City is still the place to be as having the largest number of Asian Americans of any major city (1 million of the 8.2 million residents of the Big Apple). But remember the L.A riots, and the recession hit the major cities in the Northeast a lot worse than it did in the South. So cities like Houston, TX are climbing their way up the ladder with more Asian Americans there than in my hometown of Philly (126,378 compared to 96,405).

Thus in a couple of months of moving to Waco, I began my education of Asian America in Texas. The Lone Star State is now the third largest state for Asian Americans (964,596). There are sizable communities in Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston and Austin. Remember what I said about loving to drive in Texas? These cities are 100 miles north, 180 miles southeast, and 100 miles south of Waco- one way. It takes more like a weekend to get out to these places (that or I’m getting old). But notably the largest Army base in the US is in Texas as well, and given the sizable presence of the armed forces in Asia, it may not come as a big surprise that there is a large Asian American presence in Killeen Texas, one of the closest cities to that base (My latest Indian restaurant run was there, highly recommend it).

On top of that, I’ve learned too that the ethnic composition of Asian America is quite different from locale to locale. As this map provided by the Census shows, in a city like Houston, the Vietnamese are a larger presence than the Indian population, but in Dallas this dynamic is reversed. Koreans in Houston number less than the Pakistani, but they are much larger in DFW.

 original: www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/doc/sf1.pdf

So it seems that Asians are still immigrating to the US and Asian Americans are on the move away from some of the traditional cities in favor of cities that seem to be booming. Different Asian American communities are emerging in these new areas. So depending on where you live, “Asian” likely refers to different ethnic group encounters. For you readers, what does “Asian American” mean where you live?

 

Behind the Numbers: Asian Americans and Social Institutions

As part of Asian Pacific American Heritage Month, the Census provides a fact sheet of the latest numbers on this particular collection of ethnic groups that are bundled under this racial term. Ever wonder why the Census Bureau knows about racial characteristics of the US? Believe it or not, it’s in our Constitution!

Article I. Section 2 reads:

“Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.”

As you can see, in order to figure out how many seats a given state should have in the House of Representatives, we had to count households. But counting people and households is a complicated and in some ways a political statement. As you can see, Native Americans weren’t counted and non-free persons were not counted as fully a person. For the most part these were African American slaves. After the Civil War and Emancipation, the 13th Amendment nullified the Three-Fifths Compromise and all citizens were by law to be counted as persons. So while we have a more equal system of counting in place, we still continue to count people by their racial and ethnic backgrounds to this day. We do this because American society continues to have fairly unequal outcomes in proportion to the racial groups identified in the Census.

One of the most mainstream ways that we can establish a “social barometer” is by looking at certain demographic characteristics like the ones in the Census brief. Today I want to take a closer look at civic institutional involvement. By this I am referring specifically to educational participation and military service and voting.

Yale, Yonsei or Both?  

In terms of education, Asian Americans show an exceedingly high degree of participation. 50% of Asian Americans age 25 and older in 2010 had at least a BA degree- this is in comparison to the national rate of: 28%. This number is quite striking to be sure, but this kind of figure can be misleading if we assume that “educational attainment” refers to “educational attainment in the US.” In fact most Asian Americans (about two-thirds) are not born in the US. In some cases, some Asian immigrants start their new life in America through a student visa and gain a college or graduate education here (which remains highly prestigious in the eyes of many Asian countries today). Other Asian immigrants have been and continue to be intentionally recruited for their higher education and commensurate skill set. Think about nurses, techies, engineers of Chinese, Indian or Filipino descent. Therefore most of them understand the value of a college education and likely pass that value down to their US born or US raised children. So this reflects what sociologists call a selection bias: Asians do not immigrate at random; many of the highly educated are specifically recruited or sponsored by US firms, and some immigrate to gain advanced education.

 

The Voting Gap  

If it’s important to count people to determine representation in Congress, it’s that much more important for citizens to be able to vote. Aside from citizenship you must also be 18 years of age, and you must be registered to vote. This is not a huge set of hurdles for most adult Americans, but it’s not the same for Asian Americans exactly. In the big numbers in the 2008 national elections, America looked like this: 225 million Americans aged 18 and older, and of these, 206 million or so were citizens (about 91%), and about 146 million were registered (71% of all citizens) and about 131 million voted (about 90% of all registered voters). As a proportion of all adult American citizens, 64% came out to vote. How did Asian Americans fare? Of the 10.5 million Asian Americans over the age of 18 in 2008, about 7 million were citizens (about 68%), 3.9 million were registered (56% of all Asian American citizens) and about 3.4 million voted (about 87% of Asian American registered voters). As a proportion of all adult Asian American citizens, only 49% came out to vote in 2008. Clearly the initial hurdle is gaining citizenship which is an extremely lengthy process. But once they have citizenship, Asian Americans seem to vote at about the same levels as the national average. The 15% voter gap is a huge question for political scientists like Janelle Wong and Karthick Ramakrishnan who have noted some possible explanations such as: suspicion of political institutions from their experience in their previous home country, lack of translation of registration information since English fluency may be a problem.

Ambivalent Military Service

Military service is a powerful indication of social integration but it’s one of ambivalence for some Asian Americans. Consider that most Japanese Americans were interned during World War II while only a small minority of German and Italian Americans were treated in this way. Nevertheless the 442nd Regimental Combat Team, composed of Japanese American volunteers led by white officers was the most highly-decorated regiment in the US Armed Forces. War has changed since the 1940s and so has the military (just ask Captain America ;) ). In the general population of 234 million civilians, 21.8 million were veterans – about 9.3%. Of the 11.4 million Asian American civilians in 2010, an estimated 265,198 or about 2.3% were vets. Considering the suicide of Danny Chen may have been a result of severe bullying while serving in the military (and to some extent Harry Lew as well), being Asian American in today’s military does not seem to be the kind of place where one’s patriotism is honored. In addition we should keep in mind that since the majority of Asian Americans are adult immigrants past their early years, they may be too old or otherwise unqualified to serve. Some folks like my uncles had served in the Republic of Korea army for a few years in their early 20s as part of their civic duty. By the time they arrived in the US in their late 20s and early 30s they were ready for something else.

In sum, understanding context is vital in interpreting what a statistic means. While I appreciate the efforts of the Census Bureau in sharing these facts and figures from their treasure-trove of data, it’s important to research the context and history behind these numbers. Asian Americans have rich histories both within and outside the US, and these play a huge role in their individual choices to get a college degree, vote, and serve in the military. In our multiracial environment we should take the figures we read in news releases with care as they can often understate important factors at play that can greatly affect what those numbers actually mean.

 

Hard Work + Structural Advantages: 20+ Years of Korean Immigrant Businesses

Happy Asian Pacific American Heritage Month everyone! May is a tough month to reflect on my roots and the stories of other Asian Americans, partly because there are cool holidays like Cinco De Mayo (which is no small deal in Texas), and partly because May is when all the transitions at school happen. But the wonders of the internet keep getting better as I can now subscribe to feeds that show up in my email, or as friends on Facebook posts important reminders.

In this post I want to start my month-long blog series on Asian American social issues by returning to the Los Angeles Riots of 1992 (yeah it’s a rough story to start a month of celebration, but hey this is sociology). Last time I looked at the Riots from the perspective of the motivations behind some of those who normally don’t behave is ways that exemplify social disorder. Most of those in the area stayed indoors but nevertheless there was a great deal of damage and tragic loss of life. This time I’d like to share some of the things sociologists have talked about regarding Korean Americans, particularly their businesses.  [Read more...]