A tale of two reading lists

A tale of two reading lists

Annie Holmquist compares a middle school reading list from 1908 to one from today.  It isn’t just that the latter is dumbed down in comparison, though it is.  She goes on to analyze the content of what is taught in these two sets of books and the kinds of education they exemplify.

From Jason W. Stevens, Middle School Reading Lists 100 Years Ago vs. Today | The Federalist Papers:

There’s a delightful and true saying, often attributed to Joseph Sobran, that in a hundred years, we’ve gone from teaching Latin and Greek in high school to teaching remedial English in college.

Now comes even more evidence of the steady decline of American educational standards.

Last year, Annie Holmquist, a blogger for better-ed.org, discovered a 1908 curriculum manual in the Minnesota Historical Society archives that included detailed reading lists for various grade levels.

[Keep reading. . . ]

For Annnie Holmquist’s original post, go here.

HT:  Mary Moerbe & Lars Walker

"The three Roman Catholic countries in the top five flourishing countries have a new Pope ..."

Surprises from a Huge Study on ..."
"reg complains that criteria are too subjective, but I think that if it weren't, it ..."

Surprises from a Huge Study on ..."
"A few quibbles and notes:1. I would put Israel in the WEIRD category. 2. Same ..."

Surprises from a Huge Study on ..."
"The criteria seem way too subjective and vague/squishy for me to place much weight or ..."

Surprises from a Huge Study on ..."

Browse Our Archives