A tale of two reading lists

Annie Holmquist compares a middle school reading list from 1908 to one from today.  It isn’t just that the latter is dumbed down in comparison, though it is.  She goes on to analyze the content of what is taught in these two sets of books and the kinds of education they exemplify.

From Jason W. Stevens, Middle School Reading Lists 100 Years Ago vs. Today | The Federalist Papers:

There’s a delightful and true saying, often attributed to Joseph Sobran, that in a hundred years, we’ve gone from teaching Latin and Greek in high school to teaching remedial English in college.

Now comes even more evidence of the steady decline of American educational standards.

Last year, Annie Holmquist, a blogger for better-ed.org, discovered a 1908 curriculum manual in the Minnesota Historical Society archives that included detailed reading lists for various grade levels.

[Keep reading. . . ]

For Annnie Holmquist’s original post, go here.

HT:  Mary Moerbe & Lars Walker

"Addendum no. 2!To be more focused on the difference b/n "gospel" in the larger sense ..."

A Unified Protestant Confession?
"Sex is dangerous. Children today are more risk averse than earlier generations. This shows in ..."

Teenagers are forswearing “adult activities” like ..."
"Thanks for this; the delay was perfect for me because my week was also packed ..."

A Unified Protestant Confession?
"OK, I should have read this addendum before responding, but still, elaborate some more."

A Unified Protestant Confession?

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment