Paying for sex makes it not adultery?

Paying for sex makes it not adultery? June 18, 2015

A Japanese court, ruling against a wronged wife, has ruled that if a husband pays for sex with a woman he is not married to, that is a business transaction and so cannot be considered adultery.

From Extramarital sex involving payment not adultery, Tokyo court says – UPI.com:

Sexual relationships that involve the exchange of money cannot be considered adultery, according to a Tokyo District Court ruling involving a couple and a bar hostess.

The verdict finalized in 2014 is stirring controversy among Japan’s legal experts, The Japan Times reported Wednesday. No damages were rewarded to the plaintiff – the wife of a man who was allegedly sleeping with a hostess for more than seven years.

Japanese newspaper Asahi Shimbun reported the sexual relationship between the man, a company president, and the paid sex partner had caused the plaintiff “emotional distress,” and that she had sought more than $32,000 in compensation.

Judge Masamitsu Shiseki of the Tokyo District Court ruled in 2014 the sex between the plaintiff’s husband and the hostess was strictly business, and therefore did not harm the marriage.

“The defendant had sexual relations with her patron only for business, like in cases of prostitution, and such conduct does not damage peaceful marital life,” Shiseki had said.

 

"Of course, saying that we find purpose or even encounter the transcendent as we love ..."

The Nihilism Beneath the Surface
"There is absolutely such a feeling. I just don't find "they started it" to be ..."

The Nihilism Beneath the Surface
"There is actually a large amount of what I have seen called, "optimistic nihilism," (though ..."

The Nihilism Beneath the Surface

Browse Our Archives