The Embarrassing Twitter Video on Censoring Conservatives

The Embarrassing Twitter Video on Censoring Conservatives January 12, 2018


James O’Keefe of Project Veritas makes undercover videos of leftists freely admitting to what they do.  Whereupon they get outraged.  O’Keefe’s biggest  exposé was of Planned Parenthood, showing employees casually joking about killing babies and making deals to sell their organs.  Now O’Keefe has been talking to Twitter employees, who brag about their techniques for silencing conservatives.

Below is the 15 minute video.  If you don’t want to watch it all, I’ll give you a sampling from the Project Veritas description, which also includes more details and a link to a previous video of Twitter executives:

On January 3rd 2018 at a San Francisco restaurant, Abhinov Vadrevu, a former Twitter Software Engineer explains a strategy, called “shadow banning,” that to his knowledge, Twitter has employed:

“One strategy is to shadow ban so you have ultimate control. The idea of a shadow ban is that you ban someone but they don’t know they’ve been banned, because they keep posting and no one sees their content. So they just think that no one is engaging with their content, when in reality, no one is seeing it.”. . .

In a conversation with former Twitter Content Review Agent Mo Norai on May 16th, 2017, we learned that in the past Twitter would manually ban or censor Pro-Trump or conservative content. When asked about the process of banning accounts, Norai said, “On stuff like that it was more discretion on your view point, I guess how you felt about a particular matter…”

When asked to clarify if that process was automated Norai confirmed that it was not:

“Yeah, if they said this is: ‘Pro-Trump’ I don’t want it because it offends me, this, that. And I say I banned this whole thing, and it goes over here and they are like, ‘Oh you know what? I don’t like it too. You know what? Mo’s right, let’s go, let’s carry on, what’s next?’”

Norai also revealed that more left-leaning content would go through their selection process with less political scrutiny, “It would come through checked and then I would be like ‘Oh you know what? This is okay. Let it go.’”

Norai explains that this selection process wasn’t exactly Twitter policy, but rather they were following unwritten rules from the top:

“A lot of unwritten rules, and being that we’re in San Francisco, we’re in California, very liberal, a very blue state. You had to be… I mean as a company you can’t really say it because it would make you look bad, but behind closed doors are lots of rules.”

“There was, I would say… Twitter was probably about 90% Anti-Trump, maybe 99% Anti-Trump.”. . .

At a San Francisco bar on January 5th, Pranay Singh details how the shadow-banning algorithms targeting right-leaning are engineered:

“Yeah you look for Trump, or America, and you have like five thousand keywords to describe a redneck. Then you look and parse all the messages, all the pictures, and then you look for stuff that matches that stuff.”

When asked if the majority of the algorithms are targeted against conservative or liberal users of Twitter, Singh said, “I would say majority of it are for Republicans.”



O’Keefe has a new book on his conversations with journalists entitled American Pravda.

Photo Credit: from, via HTSABO, Flickr, Creative Commons License


"oh, surely not. No one would believe such an unrealistic storyline, such a thing could ..."

Planned Parenthood’s Plan to Work Around ..."
"Nice to know somebody is doing that."

Planned Parenthood’s Plan to Work Around ..."
"I'm not claiming its not ideal because the end isn't good, but because the odds ..."

Planned Parenthood’s Plan to Work Around ..."
"But to counter your very convincing and rational argument: Hahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahah! Liar pants on fire! Hypocrite!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!There, ..."

Planned Parenthood’s Plan to Work Around ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment