$*^! Jesus Says: The Lay Down Your Weapons Edition

“You have heard it said, the only thing that can stop a bad guy with a gun, is a good guy with a gun. But verily, I say unto you, that this woman is a total badass…and her only weapons were prayer, courage, and compassion. Verily I say unto you; the world is violent, but there is always another way.”

Alright, so I don’t say ‘verily’ much. But Antoinette Tuff deserves a ‘verily.’ She verily saved the lives of countless children yesterday. When a gunman entered the school where she works, she engaged him with a clear head, a calm voice, and a kindness that, ultimately, led him to surrender. That, friends, is what happens when faith meets courage and steps into the void.

“I just started praying for him,” she said. “I just started talking to him … and let him know what was going on with me and that it would be OK…I give it all to God, I’m not the hero. I was terrified.”

Terrified or not, Tuff was tough…in every way except for physically. And while I don’t doubt that she would have put her body between the gunman and innocent children, it did not come to that. All because she was willing to make herself vulnerable in another way. She shared some of her own painful life experiences. She connected with this man who was obviously hurting in a way that few of us can even imagine. She prayed. She made herself fully present to the pain of another person. She transformed a horrific situation into a day without a death toll; and a story that is inspiring many people to think more deeply about what it means to live the faith, calling it up in a moment’s notice when another person is in need. Any person at all.

And you know what? She didn’t have a gun.

I’m not saying that every other tragic, mass shooting might have been averted IF ONLY a faithful, Godly woman had been on hand to pray the bad guys away. In fact, I’m sure there were many faithful people, in each of those situations, who acted out of love and mercy–even if the outcome was drastically different. I’m also not saying that nobody should use force, ever, to stop someone from harming innocent children. I only point out that, on this one occasion, love was louder than suffering; louder than baser instincts, more effective than legislation or constitutional rights, and far more powerful than the language of violence that permeates everything we say and do in this country.

For a people who claim to love freedom, we seem surprisingly willing to simply wait for the next tragedy. We move fearfully and cautiously. In many ways, we are crippled by our own liberties. We’ve been bought and paid for by the people who make the guns, sell the guns, and make us afraid of each other so we’ll buy more guns. We’ve internalized the liturgy of purposeful gunfire, and somehow transformed this shared narrative into a romanticized tale of wild west, cowboy justice. The good guy with the gun is king.

The right to bear arms is important to our national identity, and to our personal freedom. I know that beating all our swords into plowshares is not really a viable option, nor a desirable one. Keep the guns. Whatever. But remember this: when our founding fathers penned the constitution, they had no idea that ‘arms’ would get so big, so powerful and so plentiful. They never imagined that the tools used for hunting and necessary defense would so quickly be evolve into legally sanctioned weapons of mass destruction.

But Jesus did.

And that’s why Jesus cautions us that God’s kind of justice does not look like ours.  He reminds us that, in the face of a hopeless situation–even when violence feels like the only answer–there is almost always another way.

The other way is never easy, it is never popular, and it may not always make sense alongside the fearful narrative in which we live. It sure wouldn’t make a good movie. But every now and then, an Antoinette comes along to remind us of what God’s way might look like…and of the better story that we are called to live.  We will always live in tension between the world’s brand of good news and the Jesus kind.  The world’s kind says violence can only be stopped by more violence; but Jesus and Antoinette know a better way.

There must be a way to live faithfully in that tension; maintaining our personal freedom while also remaining faithful to the Jesus way of peace. I don’t have an easy answer about finding that balance… it involves a level of complex conversation and soul searching that defies everything we value. It would take a high level commitment to mental healthcare forallpeople; a critical look at what kinds of ‘arms’ should really be accessible to the public at large; an examination of where we get our guns, and how; and above all, a deep and honest look at how fun and awesome and even heroic we have let violence become in our shared narrative. All this. It won’t be easy.

But well…if one woman can stand in the void between chaos and grace, and somehow be the presence of God in an impossible situation; then surely we Jesus people can talk about hard things.

Here’s how we know that her way was the Jesus way… because even if we can’t count the lives of all the children she saved, we can count one life. She saved the gunman. Who does that? Not us. Not our way. Not our story of ‘justice.’ But in God’s story, even the bad guy hears the still, small voice of mercy, and is transformed.

Jesus shows up in the flesh, every day, in people who are brave enough to tell a better story. Their way is still there for us if we can find it and follow. And the darkness has not overcome it.

 

POPULAR AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Ann Gingrow Corbett

    Wonderful post. I think it’s a near miracle that this situation turned out the way it did.

  • Paul Roberts

    So, the whole nation’s citizens should be without guns, because of the “Christian” Jesus said so? Isn’t this pushing religion on others? Where is the line between what we feel about an issue, whether conservative or progressive, and what is “true” of the issue. Much of what we develop passions for are only temporary and don’t have much to do with the reality of the eternal. One person views guns as a means to do harm and evil, while another sees them as a means to protect from harm and evil. Jesus also said that Peter would suffer at the hands of others, thus was by no means delusional in that a total reliance upon God would protect someone from harm. There were many who prayed during Columbine as well. We are told to turn the other cheek, but are we called to stand by and let harm come to others? Is there a time, when a moment of judgement comes and that force (not just guns, but even fists, restraining someone) is needed to protect someone who is being neglected by police/military due to race, age, the almighty sexual orientation? The idea of holding a bible in one hand and a gun in the other swearing allegiance to the American Flag is “troublesome” for me, but the violence in this world is here to stay until it is completely done away with. Evolutionary thought process views some of the worlds creatures to have developed “deadly” defense mechanisms. Evolutionary thought also holds that humans are animals, is it not within the human right to fight over territory as lions do, develop deadly defense mechanisms to protect against those more aggressive prides?

    • http://www.imnothannah.com NotHannah

      At what point in time did the author state that all of the citizens of the nation should be without guns?

      • Erin Smallwood Wathen

        yes, what she said… I’m not advocating that we give up ALL the guns. I’m just saying the conversation is flawed. The whole ‘only good guys with guns can stop bad guys with guns’ is just way too easy, and problematic. Also–i’m with you that the whole gun in one hand, Bible in the other thing doesn’t jive. Seems like we should be able to talk about that without being called unpatriotic….

  • http://lotharlorraine.wordpress.com/ Lothar Lorraine

    Hello Erin, I’m a Frenchman so that I might not know what I’m talking about.

    But since in America many criminals, psychopaths and lunatics possess weapons, it would be suicidal not to keep one’s own arm in one’s reach, wouldn’t it?

    Lovely greetings from continental Europe.

    Lothars Sohn – Lothar’s son

    http://lotharlorraine.wordpress.com

    • Worthless Beast

      I’d beg to differ.

      For some of us, it would be suicidal to have a firearm within reach – that is, those of us who struggle with certain kinds of illnesses that come with suicidal impulses. (People are always saying that people who want to kill themselves will find a way, anyway, but things that are fairly “instant” are always a little more dangerous to have around than things that make you think before you use them. Jump off a building? That’s a long, scary fall. Razor blade – won’t that hurt?)

      Also, American crime rates – it depends upon which city you live in and if you’re in the suburbs / country or in-city. Everyone in the world seems to think we’re psycho-land, but for most of us, life is more boring than you think. (I’ve only fired a gun a few times in my life – hunting rifle, out in the woods/desert shooting at cans and clay pigeons).

      • Nordog6561

        >>For some of us, it would be suicidal to have a firearm within reach – that is, those of us who struggle with certain kinds of illnesses that come with suicidal impulses.<<

        Yeah, that's just stupid.

        The rational person does not take exception to what reasonable people should do based on what the mentally ill should not do.

        • Worthless Beast

          I don’t understand what you’re getting at. Are you calling me stupid or are you calling me reasonable? And why are you responding to a comment made almost a year ago?

          If you’re calling me stupid… *Sigh.* I recently made an online friend whose sister shot herself a few months ago. So, if you’re calling me stupid for saying “some people shouldn’t be near guns” – well, F*CK YOU. Find a rusty iron pike, sit and spin!

          • Nordog6561

            >>If you’re calling me stupid… *Sigh.* I recently made an online friend whose sister shot herself a few months ago. So, if you’re calling me stupid for saying “some people shouldn’t be near guns” – well, F*CK YOU. Find a rusty iron pike, sit and spin!<<

            Well, that's a fitting response from a worthless beast.

            Let's see…

            I understand that you do not understand what I'm was getting at.

            It's not complicated. Your statement was stupid. It was stupid for the reason I gave. To repeat: The rational person does not take exception (as you did) to what reasonable people should do (own weapons for protection) based on what the mentally ill should not do (have weapons to commit suicide).

            I really don't know if you are yourself stupid, though I'm starting to form some opinions on the matter.

            I hope that clears things up for you because, while I can explain it to you, I cannot comprehend it for you.

            I will note for the record however your propensity for violence as illustrated in your emotional response. (@Worthless Beast: "F*CK YOU. Find a rusty iron pike, sit and spin!")

            Regarding why I posted a response to your post almost a year late…

            I stumbled across these comments, read yours, and replied.

            Again, not that complicated.

          • Worthless Beast

            I have no problem with sane people owning weapons. Maybe it’s a tendency of yours to read into things, but I, personally, never said that. The European person above was talking about an image he/she had of the United States as some kind of gunslinger-land where it would be suicidal for everyone not to have guns – I was clarifying that, nope, not all neighborhoods and areas are like that (most people I know do not own guns, nor need them) and that for *some* of us, owning a firearm would not only be unneeded, but dangerous.

            I have relatives who hunt. They use guns. They are responsible. I don’t begrudge them owning weapons because they know what they are doing with them and keep them locked up, away from children.

            I suspect you’re either a touchy NRA type or a troll. I stand by what you say. So, I say unto you… go douse yourself in bear-phreremones and wait in the woods for an amorous grizzly.

            *I’ll say no more and wait around for the keeper of this blog to notice things and clean up.*

          • Nordog6561

            >>I have no problem with sane people owning weapons. Maybe it’s a tendency of yours to read into things, but I, personally, never said that. <<

            Or maybe you don't understand what you write or that to which you reply.

            @Lothar: But since in America many criminals, psychopaths and lunatics possess weapons, it would be suicidal not to keep one's own arm in one's reach, wouldn't it?

            @Your response: I'd beg to differ. For some of us, it would be suicidal to have a firearm within reach – that is, those of us who struggle with certain kinds of illnesses that come with suicidal impulses.

            Your response holds forth that rational people should not own guns for protection due to what irrational people might do.

            It's not my fault you don't understand simple language, or its most rudimentary usage.

            I'll note again your propensity to hateful violence as illustrated again in this most recent posting of yours.

            (@Worthless Beast: "F*CK YOU. Find a rusty iron pike, sit and spin!" "So, I say unto you… go douse yourself in bear-phreremones and wait in the woods for an amorous grizzly.)

            Why do you hate me and want me to suffer violence?

            Stop the H8! Start with yourself.